Hybrid retrofitting for upgrading the seismic performance of adjacent bridges vulnerable to different damage modes including pounding

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686
Jumana Hasina , Aman Mwafy , Anas Issa , M. Shahria Alam
{"title":"Hybrid retrofitting for upgrading the seismic performance of adjacent bridges vulnerable to different damage modes including pounding","authors":"Jumana Hasina ,&nbsp;Aman Mwafy ,&nbsp;Anas Issa ,&nbsp;M. Shahria Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 119686"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625000768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为提高相邻桥梁的抗震性能而进行的混合加固
地震引起的破坏,如撞击,强调了现有桥梁的脆弱性,强调了改造的基本要求。因此,本研究的目的是选择混合改造策略来提高各种损伤模式下的钢筋混凝土标准桥梁的抗震性能,以确保既有桥梁的安全性和可使用性。该研究建议采用钢阻尼器来减少支座位移(BD),在分隔间隙中采用创新的橡胶缓冲器来减轻相邻桥梁之间的结构冲击,以及采用超高性能混凝土(UHPC)护套和自定心屈曲约束支撑(SC-BRB)来降低桥梁下部结构的曲率延性(CD)要求。通过将其基于纤维的数值模型与先前实验研究中观察到的滞回行为进行比较,验证了所采用的减缓措施的理想性。然后将数值验证的改造策略应用于中等地震活动研究区内普遍存在的现有基准相邻桥梁。通过监测各种局部损伤指标,初步研究了相邻桥梁的动力特性和横向承载力,以评估改造方案。在不同的地震情景下进行易损性分析,以评估所采用的加固方案的相对性能,并评估加固后桥梁结构超过抗震能力的可能性。虽然概率评估研究表明,UHPC和SC-BRB改造方案提高桥梁横向承载力的可比比例为53 %,但采用的SC-BRB改造措施的抗震性能成本指标比UHPC方案高出39 %-79 %,证实了其在考虑的两种方案中更优。钢制减震器有效地降低了冲击力需求,而橡胶缓冲器则充分降低了冲击力需求。因此,本研究提供了将所采用的地震风险缓解技术整合到有效且经济的混合改造措施中的见解,以减轻不合格相邻桥梁的脆弱性,从而确保其震后功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board An uncoupled dual-mechanism system for seismic resilience of high-rise buildings: Parametric analyses and preliminary design procedures Study on the interfacial shear behavior of steel-UHPC glued composite decks Machine-learning assisted prediction of the heat-affected material mechanical properties of Q550GJC high strength steel thick-plate in cruciform welded joints Vehicle-induced bridge dynamic response monitoring and displacement estimation using distributed acoustic sensing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1