Hybrid retrofitting for upgrading the seismic performance of adjacent bridges vulnerable to different damage modes including pounding

IF 5.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686
Jumana Hasina , Aman Mwafy , Anas Issa , M. Shahria Alam
{"title":"Hybrid retrofitting for upgrading the seismic performance of adjacent bridges vulnerable to different damage modes including pounding","authors":"Jumana Hasina ,&nbsp;Aman Mwafy ,&nbsp;Anas Issa ,&nbsp;M. Shahria Alam","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 119686"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625000768","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquake-induced damage, such as pounding, has emphasized the vulnerability of existing bridges, underscoring the essential requirement for retrofitting. This study thus aims to select hybrid retrofit strategies for upgrading the seismic performance of reinforced concrete substandard bridges vulnerable to various damage modes to ensure the safety and serviceability of existing bridges. The study proposes implementing steel dampers to reduce bearing displacement (BD), innovative rubber bumpers in separation gaps to alleviate structural pounding between adjacent bridges, and ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) jackets and self-centering buckling restrained braces (SC-BRB) to mitigate curvature ductility (CD) demands of bridge substructure. The idealization of the adopted mitigation measures is verified by comparing their fiber-based numerical models with the hysteretic behavior observed from previous experimental studies. The numerically validated retrofit strategies are then applied to existing benchmark adjacent bridges commonly prevailing in a medium seismicity study area. The adjacent bridges’ dynamic characteristics and lateral capacity are initially investigated to evaluate the retrofit options by monitoring various local damage indices. Fragility analyses are conducted under different seismic scenarios to assess the relative performance of the adopted retrofit schemes and to evaluate the likelihood of exceeding the seismic capacity of the retrofitted bridge structure. Although the probabilistic assessment study indicated that the UHPC and SC-BRB retrofit options enhanced the bridges’ lateral capacity by a comparable ratio of 53 %, the adopted seismic performance-cost indicator of SC-BRB retrofit measure exceeded that of the UHPC alternative by 39 %-79 %, confirming its preference among the considered two alternatives. The steel dampers effectively reduce BD demands, whereas rubber bumpers adequately decrease pounding force demands. This study thus offers insights into the effects of integrating the adopted seismic risk mitigation techniques into an effective and economical hybrid retrofit measure to mitigate the vulnerability of substandard adjacent bridges, thereby ensuring their functionality post-earthquake.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Failure criteria and stress-strain constitutive envelope surfaces for UHPFRC with different volume fractions of steel fibers under triaxial compression A review of energy-dissipating systems for over-height vehicle bridge impact mitigation Fuzzy-probabilistic evaluation for the dynamic instability of corroded buried pipes conveying fluids Flexural fatigue behavior of FRP-reinforced UHPC tubular beams A state-of-the-art review of bridges subjected to earthquake fault ruptures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1