Influence of blockage ratios in shaping wind dynamics in urban environments

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106008
Geng Tian , Dingyang Geng , Liangzhu (Leon) Wang , Theodore (Ted) Stathopoulos , Minping Wan , Shiyi Chen
{"title":"Influence of blockage ratios in shaping wind dynamics in urban environments","authors":"Geng Tian ,&nbsp;Dingyang Geng ,&nbsp;Liangzhu (Leon) Wang ,&nbsp;Theodore (Ted) Stathopoulos ,&nbsp;Minping Wan ,&nbsp;Shiyi Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2025.106008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analytical urban canopy models (UCMs) based on Prandtl’s mixing length theory usually ignore the blockage effects caused by building structures, which greatly reduces their accuracy in representing wind flow and turbulence variations within urban boundary layers. This study employs large-eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric stratification to investigate the effects of various blockage ratios on wind dynamics in urban environments. Detailed analyses are conducted on variations in instantaneous flow fields, mean velocity, Reynolds shear stress, and vorticity around buildings. Results indicate that higher blockage ratios restrict airflow above buildings, leading to increased local wind speeds and intensified turbulence within the urban canopy layer. In contrast, lower blockage ratios allow smoother airflow over the canopy, minimizing interactions between the airflow and buildings. Vorticity analysis suggests that higher blockage ratios induce smaller, denser vortices in the wake region, while lower blockage ratios generate longer, more dispersed vortices near the rooftop. Furthermore, this study introduces a modified friction velocity that reduces the bias in velocity by about 17% at a low blockage ratio of 4.44%, resulting in a more accurate representation of the velocity distribution around buildings. As a result, for neutral stratification at a specific moment, known parameters such as atmospheric boundary layer height can be used to predict velocity without additional simulations, thus significantly reducing the computational costs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 106008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610525000042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical urban canopy models (UCMs) based on Prandtl’s mixing length theory usually ignore the blockage effects caused by building structures, which greatly reduces their accuracy in representing wind flow and turbulence variations within urban boundary layers. This study employs large-eddy simulations under neutral atmospheric stratification to investigate the effects of various blockage ratios on wind dynamics in urban environments. Detailed analyses are conducted on variations in instantaneous flow fields, mean velocity, Reynolds shear stress, and vorticity around buildings. Results indicate that higher blockage ratios restrict airflow above buildings, leading to increased local wind speeds and intensified turbulence within the urban canopy layer. In contrast, lower blockage ratios allow smoother airflow over the canopy, minimizing interactions between the airflow and buildings. Vorticity analysis suggests that higher blockage ratios induce smaller, denser vortices in the wake region, while lower blockage ratios generate longer, more dispersed vortices near the rooftop. Furthermore, this study introduces a modified friction velocity that reduces the bias in velocity by about 17% at a low blockage ratio of 4.44%, resulting in a more accurate representation of the velocity distribution around buildings. As a result, for neutral stratification at a specific moment, known parameters such as atmospheric boundary layer height can be used to predict velocity without additional simulations, thus significantly reducing the computational costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization for train geometry design Short-term extreme wind speed forecasting using dual-output LSTM-based regression and classification model Experimental simulation of downburst-like outflows and the associated dynamic properties of a self-supported transmission tower Aerodynamic characteristics of windbreak wall–wind barrier transition section along high-speed railways during strong crosswinds Numerical study on ventilation duct layout in subway stations for smoke control performance optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1