Identifying accurate methods of assessing blood pressure and health information by lay volunteers in the Philippines: Adapting a Canadian cardiometabolic health program to LMICs

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101832
Ricardo Angeles , Floro Dave Arnuco , Fortunato Cristobal , Lisa Dolovich , Janusz Kaczorowski , Dale Guenter , Kasthuri Selvarajah , Fiona Parascandalo , Jessica Gaber , Gina Agarwal
{"title":"Identifying accurate methods of assessing blood pressure and health information by lay volunteers in the Philippines: Adapting a Canadian cardiometabolic health program to LMICs","authors":"Ricardo Angeles ,&nbsp;Floro Dave Arnuco ,&nbsp;Fortunato Cristobal ,&nbsp;Lisa Dolovich ,&nbsp;Janusz Kaczorowski ,&nbsp;Dale Guenter ,&nbsp;Kasthuri Selvarajah ,&nbsp;Fiona Parascandalo ,&nbsp;Jessica Gaber ,&nbsp;Gina Agarwal","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Hypertension is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Canada, the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) was proven effective in reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations. The next research will evaluate an adapted version of CHAP in the southern Philippines (Community Health Assessment Program in the Philippines (CHAP-P)).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prior to full program adaptation, this two-phase study was conducted to evaluate the most appropriate methods locally for 1) assessing blood pressure (BP) readings and 2) collecting CHAP-P participant information. Phase 1 compared the correlation (Pearson's <em>r</em>) of BP readings of three automated BP monitoring devices (WatchBP Office Target, Omron HEM-7130, Microlife 3QA1); manual measurement by a health care professional; and the gold standard (trained observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer). Phase 2 compared three data collection methods (tablet, cell phone, and paper) used by Barangay Health Workers (BHWs), the local volunteers who will implement the intervention. Errors, missed data, and BHW experiences were explored during each phase.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phase 1: the device most highly correlated with the gold standard for systolic BP was the WatchBP Office Target (<em>r</em> = 0.84). For diastolic BP, the WatchBP Office Target produced the same result as the Omron HEM-7130 (<em>r</em> = 0.67). Manual BP measurement showed a very poor correlation (<em>r</em> &lt; 0.60) with the gold standard. Phase 2: BHWs found cell phones and tablets more accurate and easier than paper. They preferred tablets due to the larger screen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The WatchBP Office target and tablet will be used in the next phase of the project.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424003294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hypertension is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In Canada, the Cardiovascular Health Awareness Program (CHAP) was proven effective in reducing cardiovascular hospitalizations. The next research will evaluate an adapted version of CHAP in the southern Philippines (Community Health Assessment Program in the Philippines (CHAP-P)).

Methods

Prior to full program adaptation, this two-phase study was conducted to evaluate the most appropriate methods locally for 1) assessing blood pressure (BP) readings and 2) collecting CHAP-P participant information. Phase 1 compared the correlation (Pearson's r) of BP readings of three automated BP monitoring devices (WatchBP Office Target, Omron HEM-7130, Microlife 3QA1); manual measurement by a health care professional; and the gold standard (trained observers using a mercury sphygmomanometer). Phase 2 compared three data collection methods (tablet, cell phone, and paper) used by Barangay Health Workers (BHWs), the local volunteers who will implement the intervention. Errors, missed data, and BHW experiences were explored during each phase.

Results

Phase 1: the device most highly correlated with the gold standard for systolic BP was the WatchBP Office Target (r = 0.84). For diastolic BP, the WatchBP Office Target produced the same result as the Omron HEM-7130 (r = 0.67). Manual BP measurement showed a very poor correlation (r < 0.60) with the gold standard. Phase 2: BHWs found cell phones and tablets more accurate and easier than paper. They preferred tablets due to the larger screen.

Conclusion

The WatchBP Office target and tablet will be used in the next phase of the project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定菲律宾非专业志愿者评估血压和健康信息的准确方法:使加拿大心脏代谢健康计划适应中低收入国家
背景高血压是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。在加拿大,心血管健康意识方案(CHAP)在减少心血管疾病住院治疗方面被证明是有效的。下一项研究将评估菲律宾南部的一个改编版本的CHAP(菲律宾社区卫生评估计划(chapp))。方法在计划完全适应之前,本研究分为两个阶段,以评估当地最适合的方法:1)评估血压(BP)读数;2)收集CHAP-P参与者信息。第一阶段比较了三种自动血压监测设备(WatchBP Office Target、欧姆龙HEM-7130、Microlife 3QA1)血压读数的相关性(Pearson’s r);由卫生保健专业人员手工测量;金标准(训练有素的观测者使用水银血压计)。第二阶段比较了村卫生工作者(bhw)使用的三种数据收集方法(平板电脑、手机和纸张),他们是实施干预措施的当地志愿者。在每个阶段中,都会对错误、遗漏的数据和BHW经验进行研究。结果第一阶段:WatchBP Office Target与收缩压金标准相关性最高(r = 0.84)。对于舒张血压,WatchBP Office Target产生的结果与欧姆龙HEM-7130相同(r = 0.67)。人工血压测量显示相关性很差(r <;0.60)的金本位制。第二阶段:bhw发现手机和平板电脑比纸张更准确、更方便。由于屏幕更大,他们更喜欢平板电脑。WatchBP Office靶标和片剂将在下一阶段的项目中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Early postnatal glucose patterns and risk factors for hypoglycemia in healthy at-risk neonates: A prospective observational study Perspectives of cardiac care providers on the continuum of care among women with cardiovascular disease in a tertiary care hospital of South India Barriers and Facilitators of Generic Medication Substitution Among Healthcare Providers in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study The significance of reducing upper limb fat content in improving breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema Reasons for medication non-adherence among diabetes mellitus patients in Kelantan: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1