Out-of-plane monotonic testing and fragility function development of screw and adhesive connections of steel-framed gypsum-board panels

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Engineering Structures Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119634
C. Guzman , G. Araya-Letelier , R. Astroza , E. Miranda , M.F. Gallegos
{"title":"Out-of-plane monotonic testing and fragility function development of screw and adhesive connections of steel-framed gypsum-board panels","authors":"C. Guzman ,&nbsp;G. Araya-Letelier ,&nbsp;R. Astroza ,&nbsp;E. Miranda ,&nbsp;M.F. Gallegos","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.119634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Extensive evidence indicates that steel-frame (SF) gypsum-board (GB) partitions are susceptible to seismic damage from very small story drift ratio (SDR) demands, which can lead to significant economic losses, environmental impacts, and downtime in buildings. To mitigate this risk, several innovations have been developed in SF-GB partitions, among which the use of adhesive connections (ACs) recently stands out as a replacement strategy to screw connections (SCs) for attaching GBs to SFs. The use of ACs has shown significant increments in both strength and stiffness of partitions, compared to partitions with SCs. However, the behavior of ACs has been studied mainly under in-plane loads and without a detailed analysis of the use of ACs in the reduction of damage states (DSs) neither the generation of fragility curves. This research presents an experimental study of 36 full-scale SF-GB panels, where the structural behavior under out-of-plane loads of SC-SF-GB and AC-SF-GB panels, as well as other design variables such as GB thickness and type of SF, are assessed and compared in terms of strength, stiffness, and DS evolution. The results of the test campaign show that the mean strength and stiffness of AC-SF-GB panels are 101 % and 47 % higher than those of the SC-SF-GB panels, respectively. In addition, AC-SF-GB panels exhibit a better performance compared to SC-SF-GB panels in terms of DS evolution. The results indicate that the type of connection is a design variable with significant impact on the strength, stiffness, and damage evolution of partitions, over the GB thickness and the type of SF. Finally, the developed fragility functions, which pass the goodness-of-fit tests, confirm the enhanced seismic performance of the AC-GB-SF panels and are a key component to perform future loss estimation studies for building-specific assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 119634"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625000240","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive evidence indicates that steel-frame (SF) gypsum-board (GB) partitions are susceptible to seismic damage from very small story drift ratio (SDR) demands, which can lead to significant economic losses, environmental impacts, and downtime in buildings. To mitigate this risk, several innovations have been developed in SF-GB partitions, among which the use of adhesive connections (ACs) recently stands out as a replacement strategy to screw connections (SCs) for attaching GBs to SFs. The use of ACs has shown significant increments in both strength and stiffness of partitions, compared to partitions with SCs. However, the behavior of ACs has been studied mainly under in-plane loads and without a detailed analysis of the use of ACs in the reduction of damage states (DSs) neither the generation of fragility curves. This research presents an experimental study of 36 full-scale SF-GB panels, where the structural behavior under out-of-plane loads of SC-SF-GB and AC-SF-GB panels, as well as other design variables such as GB thickness and type of SF, are assessed and compared in terms of strength, stiffness, and DS evolution. The results of the test campaign show that the mean strength and stiffness of AC-SF-GB panels are 101 % and 47 % higher than those of the SC-SF-GB panels, respectively. In addition, AC-SF-GB panels exhibit a better performance compared to SC-SF-GB panels in terms of DS evolution. The results indicate that the type of connection is a design variable with significant impact on the strength, stiffness, and damage evolution of partitions, over the GB thickness and the type of SF. Finally, the developed fragility functions, which pass the goodness-of-fit tests, confirm the enhanced seismic performance of the AC-GB-SF panels and are a key component to perform future loss estimation studies for building-specific assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
钢框架石膏板螺钉与胶粘连接的面外单调试验及易损性研究
大量证据表明,钢框架(SF)石膏板(GB)隔墙容易受到很小的楼层漂移比(SDR)要求的地震破坏,这可能导致重大的经济损失、环境影响和建筑物停工。为了降低这种风险,SF-GB分区已经开发了一些创新,其中使用粘合剂连接(ac)最近成为螺钉连接(sc)的替代策略,用于将gb连接到sf。与使用sc的分区相比,使用ac的分区在强度和刚度方面都有显著的增加。然而,目前对复合材料的研究主要集中在面内荷载作用下,对复合材料在降低损伤状态(DSs)中的应用没有详细的分析,也没有详细的脆性曲线的生成。本研究对36块全尺寸SF-GB板进行了实验研究,对SC-SF-GB和AC-SF-GB板在面外荷载作用下的结构性能以及其他设计变量(如GB厚度和SF类型)进行了强度、刚度和DS演化的评估和比较。试验结果表明,AC-SF-GB面板的平均强度和刚度分别比SC-SF-GB面板高101 %和47 %。此外,AC-SF-GB面板在DS演化方面表现出比SC-SF-GB面板更好的性能。结果表明,连接类型是一个设计变量,在国标厚度和顺水结构类型上对隔板的强度、刚度和损伤演化有显著影响。最后,开发的易损性函数通过了拟合优度测试,证实了AC-GB-SF面板的抗震性能得到了增强,是未来进行建筑具体评估损失估计研究的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
A theoretical model for circular concrete filled steel tubes under compression considering the effect of stress path Spaceborne-InSAR monitoring framework for large-span spatial structures based on temperature-based structural identification theory A UAV-deployable lightweight framework for real-time bridge crack detection via YOLO-LY algorithm Seismic damage and time-dependent fragility assessment of non-uniformly corroded bridges subjected to short- and long-duration earthquakes Corrosion-fatigue life prediction of high-strength steel wires based on reconstructed critical distance theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1