Examining alternative approaches to antibiotic utilisation: A critical evaluation of phage therapy and antimicrobial peptides combination as potential alternatives

Chibuzo Vincent Alisigwe , Chibuzor Stanley Ikpa , Uchenna Joseph Otuonye
{"title":"Examining alternative approaches to antibiotic utilisation: A critical evaluation of phage therapy and antimicrobial peptides combination as potential alternatives","authors":"Chibuzo Vincent Alisigwe ,&nbsp;Chibuzor Stanley Ikpa ,&nbsp;Uchenna Joseph Otuonye","doi":"10.1016/j.microb.2025.100254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and bacteriophages, though long recognised, have gained significant attention in recent antimicrobial research due to the rapid evolution of microbial resistance to existing antibiotics. This publication comprehensively examines the current literature on the potential of AMPs and bacteriophages to treat infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, either as monotherapies, in combination with existing antibiotics, or in synergy with each other. Bacteriophages kill bacteria by injecting their genomes (DNA or RNA), leading to bacterial cell lysis, while AMPs can either disrupt bacterial cell membranes or interfere with their intracellular targets after penetrating the cell, causing cell death. Our review highlights that both AMPs and bacteriophages have been successfully employed in vitro, in clinical trials, and in patient treatments to eliminate bacterial isolates. Notably, studies combining AMPs and bacteriophages, though not yet widespread, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. For example, one study investigated the combined use of Lys11, an endolysin derived from phage ϕ11, and the AMP R8K against <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. The results indicated that pre-treatment with R8K significantly increased the susceptibility of <em>S. aureus</em> to Lys11-mediated lysis, even at low concentrations. While the precise mechanisms underlying the synergistic action of AMPs and bacteriophages remain unclear, our findings underscore the need for further research in this promising domain. Regarding safety, numerous studies affirm the general safety of bacteriophages due to their specificity for bacterial cells. However, concerns about phage evolution potentially eliciting human immune responses necessitate additional investigation to enhance phage therapy. The issue of safety also extends to the recommended purification of AMPs when used in conjunction with bacteriophages to prevent adverse immune reactions in patients. In conclusion, this review advocates for intensified research into the combined use of AMPs and bacteriophages, emphasising their potential to revolutionise the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101246,"journal":{"name":"The Microbe","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Microbe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950194625000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and bacteriophages, though long recognised, have gained significant attention in recent antimicrobial research due to the rapid evolution of microbial resistance to existing antibiotics. This publication comprehensively examines the current literature on the potential of AMPs and bacteriophages to treat infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, either as monotherapies, in combination with existing antibiotics, or in synergy with each other. Bacteriophages kill bacteria by injecting their genomes (DNA or RNA), leading to bacterial cell lysis, while AMPs can either disrupt bacterial cell membranes or interfere with their intracellular targets after penetrating the cell, causing cell death. Our review highlights that both AMPs and bacteriophages have been successfully employed in vitro, in clinical trials, and in patient treatments to eliminate bacterial isolates. Notably, studies combining AMPs and bacteriophages, though not yet widespread, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy. For example, one study investigated the combined use of Lys11, an endolysin derived from phage ϕ11, and the AMP R8K against Staphylococcus aureus. The results indicated that pre-treatment with R8K significantly increased the susceptibility of S. aureus to Lys11-mediated lysis, even at low concentrations. While the precise mechanisms underlying the synergistic action of AMPs and bacteriophages remain unclear, our findings underscore the need for further research in this promising domain. Regarding safety, numerous studies affirm the general safety of bacteriophages due to their specificity for bacterial cells. However, concerns about phage evolution potentially eliciting human immune responses necessitate additional investigation to enhance phage therapy. The issue of safety also extends to the recommended purification of AMPs when used in conjunction with bacteriophages to prevent adverse immune reactions in patients. In conclusion, this review advocates for intensified research into the combined use of AMPs and bacteriophages, emphasising their potential to revolutionise the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检查抗生素利用的替代方法:对噬菌体治疗和抗菌肽组合作为潜在替代方法的关键评估
抗菌肽(AMPs)和噬菌体虽然早就被认识到,但由于微生物对现有抗生素的耐药性迅速演变,它们在最近的抗菌研究中得到了极大的关注。本出版物全面审查了目前关于抗菌肽和噬菌体治疗耐药细菌引起的感染的潜力的文献,无论是作为单一疗法,与现有抗生素联合使用,还是相互协同使用。噬菌体通过注入细菌的基因组(DNA或RNA)杀死细菌,导致细菌细胞裂解,而amp在穿透细胞后可能破坏细菌细胞膜或干扰其细胞内靶标,导致细胞死亡。我们的综述强调,amp和噬菌体已经成功地应用于体外、临床试验和患者治疗中,以消除细菌分离物。值得注意的是,结合amp和噬菌体的研究,虽然尚未广泛,但已显示出显着的疗效。例如,一项研究调查了从噬菌体ϕ11中提取的内溶素Lys11和AMP R8K对金黄色葡萄球菌的联合使用。结果表明,R8K预处理显著增加了金黄色葡萄球菌对lys11介导的裂解的敏感性,即使在低浓度下也是如此。虽然AMPs和噬菌体协同作用的确切机制尚不清楚,但我们的发现强调了在这一有前途的领域进行进一步研究的必要性。在安全性方面,由于噬菌体对细菌细胞的特异性,大量研究证实了噬菌体的总体安全性。然而,对噬菌体进化可能引发人类免疫反应的担忧需要进一步的研究来加强噬菌体治疗。安全性问题也延伸到推荐的amp纯化,当与噬菌体一起使用时,以防止患者的不良免疫反应。总之,这篇综述提倡加强对抗菌肽和噬菌体联合使用的研究,强调它们有可能彻底改变抗微生物药物耐药性感染的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Caputo fractional-order model for Foot-And-Mouth Disease with environmental transmission and intervention strategies The house that Kocuria built: A potential role for functional amyloid in the unique cube-based structure of K. varians biofilms Mechanistic insights into fungal decolourization of synthetic dye pollutants: Recent trends and advances on mycoremediation strategies Not a deltasatellite: Clarifying the nature of a chimeric betasatellite-begomovirus ssDNA molecule in Priyanka et al. (2025) Dynamics of abundance and diversity of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria in aquatic ecosystems of Foumbot, an agricultural area of Cameroon (Central Africa)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1