Association between age and patients’ perceptions of safety in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101869
Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello , Franciely Daiana Engel , Gabriela Marcellino de Melo Lanzoni , Caroline Cechinel-Peiter , Diovane Ghignatti Costa , José Luis Guedes dos Santos , Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann , Chantal Backman
{"title":"Association between age and patients’ perceptions of safety in hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Mello ,&nbsp;Franciely Daiana Engel ,&nbsp;Gabriela Marcellino de Melo Lanzoni ,&nbsp;Caroline Cechinel-Peiter ,&nbsp;Diovane Ghignatti Costa ,&nbsp;José Luis Guedes dos Santos ,&nbsp;Alacoque Lorenzini Erdmann ,&nbsp;Chantal Backman","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to explore patients' perceptions of factors contributing to patient safety during hospitalization for COVID-19, with a focus on differences among three distinct adult age groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected from 533 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in nine Brazilian university hospitals between April and December 2021. Sociodemographics, health conditions, and the Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS) data were gathered via telephone interviews. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used to compare the mean scores across PMOS items, domains, and total scores by age groups (18–44; 45–64; and 65+ years).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients aged 45–64 years reported the highest perception of safety, while those aged between 18 and 44 years reported the lowest. Statistically significant differences in safety perceptions were observed across age groups. The younger adult group (18–44 years) reported lower overall PMOS scores, particularly in areas such as equipment, access to resources, and organization and care planning, compared to the middle-aged group. Younger adults were more critical of aspects including attentiveness to patient concerns, availability of health professionals, space, and equipment, teamwork skills, and information sharing between the healthcare team and patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Perception of factors contributing to patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic varied across different age groups. Understanding these differences can inform the development of targeted strategies to incorporate patient perspectives into hospital safety initiatives, indicators development, and research to improve patient safety in hospital settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101869"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221339842400366X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to explore patients' perceptions of factors contributing to patient safety during hospitalization for COVID-19, with a focus on differences among three distinct adult age groups.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were collected from 533 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in nine Brazilian university hospitals between April and December 2021. Sociodemographics, health conditions, and the Patient Measure of Safety (PMOS) data were gathered via telephone interviews. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were used to compare the mean scores across PMOS items, domains, and total scores by age groups (18–44; 45–64; and 65+ years).

Results

Patients aged 45–64 years reported the highest perception of safety, while those aged between 18 and 44 years reported the lowest. Statistically significant differences in safety perceptions were observed across age groups. The younger adult group (18–44 years) reported lower overall PMOS scores, particularly in areas such as equipment, access to resources, and organization and care planning, compared to the middle-aged group. Younger adults were more critical of aspects including attentiveness to patient concerns, availability of health professionals, space, and equipment, teamwork skills, and information sharing between the healthcare team and patients.

Conclusion

Perception of factors contributing to patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic varied across different age groups. Understanding these differences can inform the development of targeted strategies to incorporate patient perspectives into hospital safety initiatives, indicators development, and research to improve patient safety in hospital settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间年龄与患者对医院安全性认知之间的关系:一项横断面研究
目的本研究旨在探讨患者对COVID-19住院期间影响患者安全因素的看法,重点关注三个不同成人年龄组之间的差异。方法采用横断面研究。该研究收集了2021年4月至12月期间在巴西9所大学医院住院的533名COVID-19患者的数据。通过电话访谈收集社会人口统计、健康状况和患者安全测量(PMOS)数据。采用描述性统计和方差分析比较各年龄组PMOS项目、领域和总分的平均得分(18-44;45 - 64;65岁以上)。结果45 ~ 64岁的患者安全感最高,18 ~ 44岁的患者安全感最低。在安全认知方面,各年龄组的差异有统计学意义。与中年人相比,年轻人(18-44岁)的总体PMOS得分较低,特别是在设备、资源获取、组织和护理计划等方面。年轻人对以下方面更为挑剔,包括对患者关注的关注、卫生专业人员的可用性、空间和设备、团队合作技能以及医疗团队和患者之间的信息共享。结论不同年龄组对COVID-19大流行期间影响患者安全因素的认知存在差异。了解这些差异可以为制定有针对性的战略提供信息,将患者观点纳入医院安全举措、指标制定和研究中,以改善医院环境中的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and correlates of metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes patients: A cross sectional study at the provincial diabetes center in Meknes, Morocco The state of disease research in the Middle East and North Africa from 1980 to 2023 Global research trends on sleep quality among workers: A 20-year bibliometric analysis (2005–2024) Navigating urban ageing: Exploring the impact of social network types on subjective well-being among older Indians Health literacy and coronavirus guideline adherence among families in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1