Investigating public perception, knowledge and phobia towards corticosteroids post COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in India

IF 1.7 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101881
Sushma Surendra Patkar , Manasmitha R. Shettigar , Nithesh Malathesh Gujjar , Mohamed Hassan Elnaem , Muna Barakat , Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi
{"title":"Investigating public perception, knowledge and phobia towards corticosteroids post COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in India","authors":"Sushma Surendra Patkar ,&nbsp;Manasmitha R. Shettigar ,&nbsp;Nithesh Malathesh Gujjar ,&nbsp;Mohamed Hassan Elnaem ,&nbsp;Muna Barakat ,&nbsp;Mohammed Salim Karattuthodi","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Corticosteroids (CS) have been used to treat various inflammatory and allergy disorders for over a few decades. Though the effectiveness of CS is proven, safety concern prevails. The public is now more aware of CS because of the COVID-19 pandemic, but their information sources still need verification. The study investigates the general public's knowledge, experience, and fears about CS, examining their acceptance and validity, and their relationship with factors like gender, age, and education.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A cross-sectional study was conducted among the general public of India for six months. An online questionnaire was utilized to collect the perception, knowledge, and phobia towards CS following COVID-19. People who could read and understand English were included in the study. Age, gender, education level, and prior corticosteroid use were tested as predictors for knowledge and corticophobia scores by linear regression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A study involving 472 participants, primarily females and university students, found that less than 32 % were previously infected with COVID-19 and 33 % had used CS for respiratory and dermatological disorders. A quarter of the samples experienced acne and mood changes. The population had a satisfactory knowledge score, but a high phobia score. Corticophobia score was positively associated with side effects and knowledge score, but educational level negatively influenced the development of corticophobia.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study found that, despite having a satisfactory knowledge of CS, participants displayed a high corticophobia score. Addressing this issue requires awareness campaigns, patient education programs, and patient interaction, and educating healthcare workers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101881"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424003786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Corticosteroids (CS) have been used to treat various inflammatory and allergy disorders for over a few decades. Though the effectiveness of CS is proven, safety concern prevails. The public is now more aware of CS because of the COVID-19 pandemic, but their information sources still need verification. The study investigates the general public's knowledge, experience, and fears about CS, examining their acceptance and validity, and their relationship with factors like gender, age, and education.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among the general public of India for six months. An online questionnaire was utilized to collect the perception, knowledge, and phobia towards CS following COVID-19. People who could read and understand English were included in the study. Age, gender, education level, and prior corticosteroid use were tested as predictors for knowledge and corticophobia scores by linear regression.

Results

A study involving 472 participants, primarily females and university students, found that less than 32 % were previously infected with COVID-19 and 33 % had used CS for respiratory and dermatological disorders. A quarter of the samples experienced acne and mood changes. The population had a satisfactory knowledge score, but a high phobia score. Corticophobia score was positively associated with side effects and knowledge score, but educational level negatively influenced the development of corticophobia.

Conclusion

The study found that, despite having a satisfactory knowledge of CS, participants displayed a high corticophobia score. Addressing this issue requires awareness campaigns, patient education programs, and patient interaction, and educating healthcare workers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查公众对COVID-19后皮质类固醇的认知、知识和恐惧:印度的一项横断面研究
几十年来,皮质类固醇(CS)一直被用于治疗各种炎症和过敏疾病。虽然CS的有效性已得到证实,但安全问题仍然普遍存在。由于新冠肺炎疫情,公众对CS的认识有所提高,但其信息来源仍有待核实。该研究调查了公众对计算机科学的知识、经验和恐惧,考察了他们的接受度和有效性,以及他们与性别、年龄和教育等因素的关系。方法对印度普通民众进行为期6个月的横断面研究。通过在线问卷调查,收集患者对COVID-19后CS的认知、知识和恐惧。能够阅读和理解英语的人被纳入研究。年龄、性别、教育水平和既往皮质类固醇使用情况通过线性回归测试作为知识和皮质恐惧症评分的预测因子。结果一项涉及472名参与者(主要是女性和大学生)的研究发现,不到32%的人以前感染过COVID-19, 33%的人曾使用CS治疗呼吸和皮肤疾病。四分之一的样本出现了痤疮和情绪变化。人群的知识得分令人满意,但恐惧得分较高。皮质恐惧症得分与不良反应和知识得分呈正相关,而文化程度对皮质恐惧症的发展有负相关影响。结论研究发现,尽管对CS有满意的了解,但参与者表现出较高的皮质恐惧症得分。要解决这一问题,需要开展宣传活动,开展患者教育计划,开展患者互动,并对医护人员进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and correlates of metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes patients: A cross sectional study at the provincial diabetes center in Meknes, Morocco The state of disease research in the Middle East and North Africa from 1980 to 2023 Global research trends on sleep quality among workers: A 20-year bibliometric analysis (2005–2024) Navigating urban ageing: Exploring the impact of social network types on subjective well-being among older Indians Health literacy and coronavirus guideline adherence among families in Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1