Somporn Sahachaiseree , Mohammad Sadrani , Constantinos Antoniou
{"title":"Stop plan optimisation for three-pattern skip-stop schemes for urban rail transit systems","authors":"Somporn Sahachaiseree , Mohammad Sadrani , Constantinos Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtl.2024.100149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mass rapid transit systems around the world are typically designed for all-stop operation schemes, in which train overtaking is not possible. To accelerate transit operation, the conventional A/B skip-stop scheme may be planned. This research explores alternative skip-stop schemes with three stop patterns, aiming to better match transit services with the spatial distribution of travel demand. The proposed generalised skip-stop operation model considers both the total cost of passengers and operator. A genetic algorithm is employed to solve the stop-plan optimisation problem, and a heuristic is tailored to determine an optimal dispatch headway for the respective stop plan. Based on computational experiments using synthetic data, the results suggest that skip-stop schemes have the potential to reduce total time costs by about 10%, particularly when there are structured demand concentrations, transit systems can operate safely with low time headway and short-distance demand is low. Although the total-cost saving of the best A/B skip-stop plan found is generally superior to those of other three-pattern skip-stop schemes, a three-pattern skip-stop scheme was found to offer a better total-cost saving in a scenario without short-distance travel demands. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of different skip-stop schemes, contributing to a better understanding of their impact on passengers and operators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45871,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192437624000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mass rapid transit systems around the world are typically designed for all-stop operation schemes, in which train overtaking is not possible. To accelerate transit operation, the conventional A/B skip-stop scheme may be planned. This research explores alternative skip-stop schemes with three stop patterns, aiming to better match transit services with the spatial distribution of travel demand. The proposed generalised skip-stop operation model considers both the total cost of passengers and operator. A genetic algorithm is employed to solve the stop-plan optimisation problem, and a heuristic is tailored to determine an optimal dispatch headway for the respective stop plan. Based on computational experiments using synthetic data, the results suggest that skip-stop schemes have the potential to reduce total time costs by about 10%, particularly when there are structured demand concentrations, transit systems can operate safely with low time headway and short-distance demand is low. Although the total-cost saving of the best A/B skip-stop plan found is generally superior to those of other three-pattern skip-stop schemes, a three-pattern skip-stop scheme was found to offer a better total-cost saving in a scenario without short-distance travel demands. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of different skip-stop schemes, contributing to a better understanding of their impact on passengers and operators.
期刊介绍:
The EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics promotes the use of mathematics in general, and operations research in particular, in the context of transportation and logistics. It is a forum for the presentation of original mathematical models, methodologies and computational results, focussing on advanced applications in transportation and logistics. The journal publishes two types of document: (i) research articles and (ii) tutorials. A research article presents original methodological contributions to the field (e.g. new mathematical models, new algorithms, new simulation techniques). A tutorial provides an introduction to an advanced topic, designed to ease the use of the relevant methodology by researchers and practitioners.