Public policy and sustainability: How green core competence, government trust, and policy satisfaction influence green R&D investments in the private sector

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100461
Fadi Abdelfattah , Mohammed Salah , Khalid Dahleez , Riyad Darwazeh , Hussam Al Halbusi
{"title":"Public policy and sustainability: How green core competence, government trust, and policy satisfaction influence green R&D investments in the private sector","authors":"Fadi Abdelfattah ,&nbsp;Mohammed Salah ,&nbsp;Khalid Dahleez ,&nbsp;Riyad Darwazeh ,&nbsp;Hussam Al Halbusi","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines how green innovation practices influence organizational capabilities and investments in sustainability within Omani firms. Grounded in Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory, it explores the relationship between Green Product Innovation Performance (GPIP), Green Process Innovation Performance (GPcIP), Green Core Competence (GCC), and Green Research and Development (R&amp;D) Investments. Data collected from 214 top management personnel across diverse industries in Oman were examined via Structural Equation Modeling. The findings reveal that GPIP positively affects GCC, indicating that firms excelling in green product innovation enhance their strategic environmental capabilities. Conversely, GPcIP does not significantly impact GCC, suggesting that process innovations may need integration with broader strategies to influence core competencies effectively. GCC positively influences Green R&amp;D Investments, showing that firms with solid environmental capabilities are more likely to finance sustainable innovation. Moreover, Trust in Government (TG) and Satisfaction with Sustainability Government Policies (SWGM) significantly moderate the relationships between GPIP, GPcIP, GCC, and Green R&amp;D Investments. High levels of trust and satisfaction amplify these positive effects, highlighting the crucial role of a supportive institutional environment in fostering sustainable innovation. The study contributes to theoretical frameworks by integrating internal capabilities with external institutional factors within the context of sustainability, thereby bridging gaps between Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory. Practically, it suggests that firms should focus on green product innovation and develop GCC, while policymakers should foster trust and satisfaction through transparent and supportive policies to encourage green R&amp;D investments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines how green innovation practices influence organizational capabilities and investments in sustainability within Omani firms. Grounded in Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory, it explores the relationship between Green Product Innovation Performance (GPIP), Green Process Innovation Performance (GPcIP), Green Core Competence (GCC), and Green Research and Development (R&D) Investments. Data collected from 214 top management personnel across diverse industries in Oman were examined via Structural Equation Modeling. The findings reveal that GPIP positively affects GCC, indicating that firms excelling in green product innovation enhance their strategic environmental capabilities. Conversely, GPcIP does not significantly impact GCC, suggesting that process innovations may need integration with broader strategies to influence core competencies effectively. GCC positively influences Green R&D Investments, showing that firms with solid environmental capabilities are more likely to finance sustainable innovation. Moreover, Trust in Government (TG) and Satisfaction with Sustainability Government Policies (SWGM) significantly moderate the relationships between GPIP, GPcIP, GCC, and Green R&D Investments. High levels of trust and satisfaction amplify these positive effects, highlighting the crucial role of a supportive institutional environment in fostering sustainable innovation. The study contributes to theoretical frameworks by integrating internal capabilities with external institutional factors within the context of sustainability, thereby bridging gaps between Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Institutional Theory. Practically, it suggests that firms should focus on green product innovation and develop GCC, while policymakers should foster trust and satisfaction through transparent and supportive policies to encourage green R&D investments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共政策与可持续性:绿色核心竞争力、政府信任和政策满意度如何影响私营部门的绿色研发投资
本研究考察了绿色创新实践如何影响阿曼公司的组织能力和可持续性投资。本文以动态能力理论和制度理论为基础,探讨了绿色产品创新绩效(gip)、绿色过程创新绩效(GPcIP)、绿色核心竞争力(GCC)和绿色研发投资之间的关系。通过结构方程模型对从阿曼不同行业的214名高层管理人员收集的数据进行了检查。研究结果表明,绿色产品创新对GCC具有正向影响,表明绿色产品创新的企业提升了其战略环境能力。相反,GPcIP对GCC没有显著影响,这表明流程创新可能需要与更广泛的战略相结合,才能有效地影响核心竞争力。海湾合作委员会积极影响绿色研发投资,表明具有坚实环境能力的公司更有可能为可持续创新提供资金。此外,政府信任(TG)和可持续政府政策满意度(SWGM)显著调节了gipp、GPcIP、GCC与绿色研发投资之间的关系。高水平的信任和满意度放大了这些积极影响,突出了支持性制度环境在促进可持续创新方面的关键作用。该研究通过将内部能力与外部制度因素整合到可持续性的背景下,从而弥补了动态能力理论与制度理论之间的差距,为理论框架的构建做出了贡献。具体而言,建议企业应注重绿色产品创新并发展GCC,而政策制定者应通过透明和支持性的政策来促进信任和满意度,以鼓励绿色研发投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of climate change anxiety and social media information overload on unusual purchase behavior Why direct payments are more effective for combatting poverty than fair prices Exploring the role of media in climate change awareness and adaptation among university students in Islamabad, Pakistan Sustainable leather processing: A critical review of emerging green technologies and practices The impact mechanism of ESG ratings on firm value: An empirical study based on the multi-period difference-in-differences approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1