Metacognition vulnerabilities in time of crisis: Who to protect from suicidal risk?

Q4 Medicine Psiquiatria Biologica Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.psiq.2024.100553
Sylvia Martin, Anna Oltra, Jonathan Del Monte
{"title":"Metacognition vulnerabilities in time of crisis: Who to protect from suicidal risk?","authors":"Sylvia Martin,&nbsp;Anna Oltra,&nbsp;Jonathan Del Monte","doi":"10.1016/j.psiq.2024.100553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, we could try to avoid negative information processing and anxiogenic content to prevent unhealthy thinking processes. One of the processes we can observe regarding our way of thinking is metacognition. The objective of this study is to look at its possible impact on suicide risk in the clinical and non-clinical populations. The results showed that the COVID 19 crisis influenced metacognitive levels for the non-clinical sample but not for the clinical population. Moreover, hopelessness predicted suicide risk for both populations, but metacognition was also a predictive factor for the non-clinical sample. In conclusion, the possible impact of preventive measures based on metacognitive work that can be created out of these results is presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39337,"journal":{"name":"Psiquiatria Biologica","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 100553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psiquiatria Biologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134593424001131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we could try to avoid negative information processing and anxiogenic content to prevent unhealthy thinking processes. One of the processes we can observe regarding our way of thinking is metacognition. The objective of this study is to look at its possible impact on suicide risk in the clinical and non-clinical populations. The results showed that the COVID 19 crisis influenced metacognitive levels for the non-clinical sample but not for the clinical population. Moreover, hopelessness predicted suicide risk for both populations, but metacognition was also a predictive factor for the non-clinical sample. In conclusion, the possible impact of preventive measures based on metacognitive work that can be created out of these results is presented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危机时刻的元认知脆弱性:保护谁免受自杀风险?
在新冠肺炎大流行期间,我们可以尽量避免负面信息加工和焦虑内容,防止不健康的思维过程。我们可以观察到的关于我们思维方式的一个过程是元认知。这项研究的目的是观察它对临床和非临床人群自杀风险的可能影响。结果表明,COVID - 19危机影响了非临床样本的元认知水平,但对临床人群没有影响。此外,绝望预测了两种人群的自杀风险,但元认知也是非临床样本的预测因素。最后,提出了基于元认知工作的预防措施可能产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psiquiatria Biologica
Psiquiatria Biologica Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Psiquiatría Biológica. Los recientes avances en el conocimiento de la bioquímica y de la fisiología cerebrales y el progreso en general en el campo de las neurociencias han abierto el camino al desarrollo de la psiquiatría biológica, fundada sobre bases anatomofisiológicas, más sólidas y científicas que la psiquiatría tradicional.
期刊最新文献
Classical biomarkers and omics analysis in bipolar disorder Trastorno esquizo-obsesivo: revisión actualizada sobre su clínica, neurobiología y tratamiento Historia conceptual de los síntomas y trastornos funcionales Relationship between pollutants and meteorological factors in psychiatry Miocarditis asintomática inducida por clozapina: la importancia de la monitorización en el diagnóstico precoz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1