Farmers’ attitude towards green ammonia produced by upcycling waste nitrogen: Empirical evidence from an Iowa study

IF 4.9 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100450
Yu Wang , Wenzhen Li , Shuang Gu
{"title":"Farmers’ attitude towards green ammonia produced by upcycling waste nitrogen: Empirical evidence from an Iowa study","authors":"Yu Wang ,&nbsp;Wenzhen Li ,&nbsp;Shuang Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines farmers' acceptance of green ammonia produced by upcycling waste nitrogen using renewable energy. A mail survey, targeting a random sample of crop growers in Iowa, USA, found moderately high acceptance: about 50 % support green ammonia as a fertilizer and 32 % support green ammonia as a fuel. Support for green hydrogen is only 17 % (24 % opposing), demonstrating a preference of the 2nd-generation over the 1st-generation technologies. Ordinal logistic regression reveals social and psychological factors affecting attitude, including income, ideology, perceived benefit, ammonia usage, trust in science and technology, personal belief in reducing waste nitrogen, and social norm.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100450"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188825000206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines farmers' acceptance of green ammonia produced by upcycling waste nitrogen using renewable energy. A mail survey, targeting a random sample of crop growers in Iowa, USA, found moderately high acceptance: about 50 % support green ammonia as a fertilizer and 32 % support green ammonia as a fuel. Support for green hydrogen is only 17 % (24 % opposing), demonstrating a preference of the 2nd-generation over the 1st-generation technologies. Ordinal logistic regression reveals social and psychological factors affecting attitude, including income, ideology, perceived benefit, ammonia usage, trust in science and technology, personal belief in reducing waste nitrogen, and social norm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农民对废氮升级回收产生的绿色氨的态度:来自爱荷华州研究的经验证据
本研究考察了农民对利用可再生能源对废氮进行升级回收产生的绿色氨的接受程度。一项针对美国爱荷华州农作物种植者随机抽样的邮件调查发现,接受度较高:约50%的人支持将绿色氨作为肥料,32%的人支持将绿色氨作为燃料。只有17%的人支持绿色氢(24%的人反对),这表明第二代技术比第一代技术更受青睐。有序逻辑回归揭示了影响态度的社会和心理因素,包括收入、意识形态、感知利益、氨用量、对科学技术的信任、个人减少废氮的信念和社会规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of climate change anxiety and social media information overload on unusual purchase behavior Why direct payments are more effective for combatting poverty than fair prices Exploring the role of media in climate change awareness and adaptation among university students in Islamabad, Pakistan Sustainable leather processing: A critical review of emerging green technologies and practices The impact mechanism of ESG ratings on firm value: An empirical study based on the multi-period difference-in-differences approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1