Rendimiento cognitivo, autopercepción y estrategias compensatorias en conductores mayores de 65 años

Q4 Medicine Neurologia Argentina Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neuarg.2024.10.001
Mariana Zanino , Iara Jácome , María Celeste Moyano , Diana Bruno , María Roca
{"title":"Rendimiento cognitivo, autopercepción y estrategias compensatorias en conductores mayores de 65 años","authors":"Mariana Zanino ,&nbsp;Iara Jácome ,&nbsp;María Celeste Moyano ,&nbsp;Diana Bruno ,&nbsp;María Roca","doi":"10.1016/j.neuarg.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Due to the increase in life expectancy, everyday tasks, such as vehicular driving, will remain throughout time as an important part of the activities that adults carry out. This complex activity, which involves several cognitive functions, may be affected by the aging process. The person's capacity of perception of these changes might benefit the use of certain adaptive strategies so as to make up for the deficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyze the cognitive performance and its relation to auto perception of their cognitive performance and the use of adaptive strategies developed by the active older drivers.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Ninety four active drivers between 64 and 90 years old, from San Juan, Argentina, have been under an evaluation. The Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire was provided, a neuropsychological battery used to measure cognitive functions and a questionnaire on compensatory behavior while vehicular driving. The sample was divided into two groups according to the age for its analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences between groups have been observed in tests that claim detrimental cognitive functions in the oldest. Concerning the older group, less correspondence to Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire and to cognitive function tests have been observed. Regarding adaptive strategies, the elder group applies more strategies, in comparison to the young. No statistically significant relationship was observed between the perception of changes and the use of compensatory strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The older group shows more cognitive impairment and less auto perception of change, in comparison to the younger group. Self-perception of cognitive changes is not necessarily associated with the incorporation of compensatory strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39051,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia Argentina","volume":"16 4","pages":"Pages 187-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia Argentina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1853002824000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Due to the increase in life expectancy, everyday tasks, such as vehicular driving, will remain throughout time as an important part of the activities that adults carry out. This complex activity, which involves several cognitive functions, may be affected by the aging process. The person's capacity of perception of these changes might benefit the use of certain adaptive strategies so as to make up for the deficiency.

Objective

To analyze the cognitive performance and its relation to auto perception of their cognitive performance and the use of adaptive strategies developed by the active older drivers.

Method

Ninety four active drivers between 64 and 90 years old, from San Juan, Argentina, have been under an evaluation. The Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire was provided, a neuropsychological battery used to measure cognitive functions and a questionnaire on compensatory behavior while vehicular driving. The sample was divided into two groups according to the age for its analysis.

Results

Significant differences between groups have been observed in tests that claim detrimental cognitive functions in the oldest. Concerning the older group, less correspondence to Cognitive Complaints Questionnaire and to cognitive function tests have been observed. Regarding adaptive strategies, the elder group applies more strategies, in comparison to the young. No statistically significant relationship was observed between the perception of changes and the use of compensatory strategies.

Conclusion

The older group shows more cognitive impairment and less auto perception of change, in comparison to the younger group. Self-perception of cognitive changes is not necessarily associated with the incorporation of compensatory strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia Argentina
Neurologia Argentina Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Neurología Argentina es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Neurológica Argentina. Todos los artículos, publicados en español, son sometidos a un proceso de revisión sobre ciego por pares con la finalidad de ofrecer información original, relevante y de alta calidad que abarca todos los aspectos de la Neurología y la Neurociencia.
期刊最新文献
Calcificación cerebral familiar primaria: reporte de caso Rendimiento cognitivo, autopercepción y estrategias compensatorias en conductores mayores de 65 años Ideas erróneas sobre daño cerebral adquirido en población de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires Encefalitis de Rasmussen de inicio tardío: presentación de un caso y revisión de la literatura No toda inflamación orbital es celulitis: un caso clínico de una fístula carotídeo-cavernosa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1