Evaluating public awareness and perceptions of emergency response beacons on beaches of New South Wales, Australia

IF 5.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY Ocean & Coastal Management Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107553
Olivier P. Pastore , Anthony Blunden , Amy E. Peden , Jasmin C. Lawes , Robert W. Brander
{"title":"Evaluating public awareness and perceptions of emergency response beacons on beaches of New South Wales, Australia","authors":"Olivier P. Pastore ,&nbsp;Anthony Blunden ,&nbsp;Amy E. Peden ,&nbsp;Jasmin C. Lawes ,&nbsp;Robert W. Brander","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Most drowning deaths on Australian beaches occur away from lifeguarding and lifesaving services, or outside of their patrol times. In response, Emergency Response Beacons (ERBs), that can be activated to alert authorities of an incident, have been installed at some coastal locations with high drowning risk. This study investigates public knowledge and understanding of these safety devices through analyses of 301 survey responses conducted with beachgoers at beaches, both with and without ERBs, in New South Wales, Australia. Less than a third (28%) of surveyed beachgoers had heard of ERBs, of which half (54%) could correctly describe what an ERB was. Beachgoers living 1–10 km from the coast were more aware of ERB presence (82%) and had learned about them by themselves (45%) or via the news (24%). Only half (50%) of surveyed beachgoers aware of ERBs knew in advance if the beach they were visiting had an ERB installed. Most surveyed beachgoers (72%), including those briefed about them after the survey, rated ERBs as being extremely useful. Survey results also revealed a potential risk for individuals with lower swimming abilities who indicated they would be more likely to enter the water if an ERB was present (80%), perceiving that emergency response and rescue times would be faster. However, results show that ERB locations vary greatly in distances and times from closest emergency services, which could impact the chance of a successful rescue and this perception of increased safety could lead to more people exposed to drowning risks and should be factored into future ERB communications. This study highlights the need for improved public education and broader community promotion of the purpose and locations of Emergency Response Beacons. In addition, the research offers significant contributions to coastal management and policy by providing actionable insights for improving emergency responses to coastal incidents. Our findings lay a foundation for enhanced public awareness and strategic response measures in NSW and potentially serve as a model for similar coastal areas.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 107553"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125000158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most drowning deaths on Australian beaches occur away from lifeguarding and lifesaving services, or outside of their patrol times. In response, Emergency Response Beacons (ERBs), that can be activated to alert authorities of an incident, have been installed at some coastal locations with high drowning risk. This study investigates public knowledge and understanding of these safety devices through analyses of 301 survey responses conducted with beachgoers at beaches, both with and without ERBs, in New South Wales, Australia. Less than a third (28%) of surveyed beachgoers had heard of ERBs, of which half (54%) could correctly describe what an ERB was. Beachgoers living 1–10 km from the coast were more aware of ERB presence (82%) and had learned about them by themselves (45%) or via the news (24%). Only half (50%) of surveyed beachgoers aware of ERBs knew in advance if the beach they were visiting had an ERB installed. Most surveyed beachgoers (72%), including those briefed about them after the survey, rated ERBs as being extremely useful. Survey results also revealed a potential risk for individuals with lower swimming abilities who indicated they would be more likely to enter the water if an ERB was present (80%), perceiving that emergency response and rescue times would be faster. However, results show that ERB locations vary greatly in distances and times from closest emergency services, which could impact the chance of a successful rescue and this perception of increased safety could lead to more people exposed to drowning risks and should be factored into future ERB communications. This study highlights the need for improved public education and broader community promotion of the purpose and locations of Emergency Response Beacons. In addition, the research offers significant contributions to coastal management and policy by providing actionable insights for improving emergency responses to coastal incidents. Our findings lay a foundation for enhanced public awareness and strategic response measures in NSW and potentially serve as a model for similar coastal areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估公众对澳大利亚新南威尔士州海滩上应急信标的认识和看法
澳大利亚海滩上的大多数溺水死亡事件都发生在救生员和救生服务之外,或者在他们的巡逻时间之外。作为回应,在一些溺水风险高的沿海地区安装了应急响应信标(ERBs),可以启动以向当局发出事故警报。本研究通过分析在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的海滩上进行的301项调查回应,调查了公众对这些安全装置的认识和理解,这些海滩上有和没有erb。不到三分之一(28%)的受访海滩游客听说过ERB,其中一半(54%)的人能正确描述ERB是什么。居住在距离海岸1-10公里的海滩游客更了解ERB的存在(82%),他们是自己(45%)或通过新闻(24%)了解的。在接受调查的泳客中,只有一半(50%)知道他们要去的泳滩是否安装了ERB。大多数被调查的海滩游客(72%),包括那些在调查后了解到他们的人,都认为erb非常有用。调查结果还揭示了游泳能力较低的人的潜在风险,他们表示,如果有ERB存在,他们更有可能进入水中(80%),认为应急反应和救援时间会更快。然而,研究结果表明,应急中心的位置与最近的应急服务在距离和时间上差异很大,这可能会影响成功救援的机会,这种增加安全的感觉可能会导致更多的人面临溺水风险,应该在未来的应急中心通信中考虑到这一点。这项研究强调需要改进公众教育,并在更广泛的社区推广应急信标的目的和地点。此外,该研究通过为改善对沿海事件的应急反应提供可操作的见解,为沿海管理和政策做出了重大贡献。我们的研究结果为新南威尔士州提高公众意识和战略应对措施奠定了基础,并有可能成为类似沿海地区的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fish restocking as a conservation strategy: Challenges and opportunities Institutional configurations and ecological participation: An fsQCA–IAD analysis of coastal farmers in China Distribution and density of baleen whales and delphinids in the European Macaronesia Geoecological analysis of the coastal-marine zone of the gulf of Montijo, Veraguas, Panama Transition from vulnerability to viability in small-scale fisheries: A diagnostic framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1