Economical Assessment of Industrial Motor Replacement from the Perspective of Life Cycle Cost Analysis

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Latin America Transactions Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1109/TLA.2025.10851461
Antônio José Nogueira Jr.;Rogério Silva;Victor Aguiar;Ricardo Pontes
{"title":"Economical Assessment of Industrial Motor Replacement from the Perspective of Life Cycle Cost Analysis","authors":"Antônio José Nogueira Jr.;Rogério Silva;Victor Aguiar;Ricardo Pontes","doi":"10.1109/TLA.2025.10851461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing concern about climate change has underpinned global efforts toward the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). In this sense, energy efficiency actions (EEAs) are interesting solutions that have been expanding over the years in the industrial sector. Replacing low-efficiency electric motors with high-efficiency counterparts is a ubiquitous action in this sense. However, they still have a high cost, making it necessary to perform a proper technical-economic analysis to determine the feasibility of the action. For this purpose, life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) has proven to be an excellent alternative for economic viability verification of EEAs because this methodology takes into account expenses throughout the entire life cycle of the project or equipment. Considering decision-making involving optimization, this work proposes a methodology to calculate the present residual value at the end of the life cycle, considering the service time of motors and the chosen study period for the project. Two case studies involving predicted theoretical situations are simulated, and the impact of service time on the replacement of a 50-CV, four-pole motor and, 40-CV in a local industry is assessed. It is observed that Net Savings are affected by the study period when replacement occurs in terms of a low-power high-efficiency motor since such action can lead to different service times. Overall, the improved LCC applied to induction motors replacement proves to be a good method for predicting the residual value, whereas the results show that different service times are necessary to maximize net savings and the residual cost in the same case.","PeriodicalId":55024,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Latin America Transactions","volume":"23 2","pages":"144-152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10851461","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Latin America Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10851461/","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing concern about climate change has underpinned global efforts toward the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). In this sense, energy efficiency actions (EEAs) are interesting solutions that have been expanding over the years in the industrial sector. Replacing low-efficiency electric motors with high-efficiency counterparts is a ubiquitous action in this sense. However, they still have a high cost, making it necessary to perform a proper technical-economic analysis to determine the feasibility of the action. For this purpose, life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) has proven to be an excellent alternative for economic viability verification of EEAs because this methodology takes into account expenses throughout the entire life cycle of the project or equipment. Considering decision-making involving optimization, this work proposes a methodology to calculate the present residual value at the end of the life cycle, considering the service time of motors and the chosen study period for the project. Two case studies involving predicted theoretical situations are simulated, and the impact of service time on the replacement of a 50-CV, four-pole motor and, 40-CV in a local industry is assessed. It is observed that Net Savings are affected by the study period when replacement occurs in terms of a low-power high-efficiency motor since such action can lead to different service times. Overall, the improved LCC applied to induction motors replacement proves to be a good method for predicting the residual value, whereas the results show that different service times are necessary to maximize net savings and the residual cost in the same case.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Latin America Transactions
IEEE Latin America Transactions COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IEEE Latin America Transactions (IEEE LATAM) is an interdisciplinary journal focused on the dissemination of original and quality research papers / review articles in Spanish and Portuguese of emerging topics in three main areas: Computing, Electric Energy and Electronics. Some of the sub-areas of the journal are, but not limited to: Automatic control, communications, instrumentation, artificial intelligence, power and industrial electronics, fault diagnosis and detection, transportation electrification, internet of things, electrical machines, circuits and systems, biomedicine and biomedical / haptic applications, secure communications, robotics, sensors and actuators, computer networks, smart grids, among others.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a Reliability-Centered Maintenance Plan for Fire-Tube Boilers: A Case Study in the Textile Industry Smart Grid Insulator Detection Network Improved based on YOLOv8 Controlled Wireless Channel using Multi-Antenna Multi-IRS Assisted Communication System: A Comprehensive Performance Analysis Dengue-Infected Mosquito Detection with Uncertainty Evaluation based on Monte Carlo Dropout Economical Assessment of Industrial Motor Replacement from the Perspective of Life Cycle Cost Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1