{"title":"Evaluation of three solvent-based recycling pathways for circular polypropylene†","authors":"Benjamin Caudle , Thuy T. H. Nguyen , Sho Kataoka","doi":"10.1039/d4gc02646b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solvent-based methods for recycling polyolefin plastic waste have caught increasing attention, as they can produce recycled plastic of significantly higher quality than currently employed techniques. In this study, to demonstrate the development of plastic recycling systems for a circular economy, three solvent-based processes used for recycling polypropylene (PP), one of the most widely used plastic materials in Japan, were rigorously modeled and analyzed in terms of economic performance and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment-based method was applied to quantify all sources of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions comprehensively. The most common solvent-based recycling method, in which the polymer is dissolved in a solvent and precipitated with an antisolvent, had the lowest economic performance and produced the highest CO<sub>2</sub> emissions: 1.30 kg of CO<sub>2</sub>-equivalent per kg rPP. A more recently developed process in which the temperature of the solvent is manipulated to effect dissolution and precipitation had lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, at 0.92 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> rPP, and the most promising economic performance. A novel process using supercritical propane as the solvent achieved the lowest emissions of 0.32 kg kg<sup>−1</sup> rPP with similar economic performance to the temperature-dependent separation process. The environmental competitiveness (in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions) of these recycling processes is further investigated by comparison with alternative state-of-the-art methods of plastic waste disposal, including mechanical recycling, gasification, and incineration with thermal recovery. Sensitivity studies were carried out to explore the effect of the waste plastic feed composition resulting from different preparation (sorting) methods on the economic and environmental performance of the three solvent-based recycling processes. The results obtained from this study are expected to provide valuable insights for constructing a green and cost-effective PP recycling process toward a circular economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":"27 6","pages":"Pages 1667-1678"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/gc/d4gc02646b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926224010173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Solvent-based methods for recycling polyolefin plastic waste have caught increasing attention, as they can produce recycled plastic of significantly higher quality than currently employed techniques. In this study, to demonstrate the development of plastic recycling systems for a circular economy, three solvent-based processes used for recycling polypropylene (PP), one of the most widely used plastic materials in Japan, were rigorously modeled and analyzed in terms of economic performance and CO2 emissions. A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment-based method was applied to quantify all sources of CO2 emissions comprehensively. The most common solvent-based recycling method, in which the polymer is dissolved in a solvent and precipitated with an antisolvent, had the lowest economic performance and produced the highest CO2 emissions: 1.30 kg of CO2-equivalent per kg rPP. A more recently developed process in which the temperature of the solvent is manipulated to effect dissolution and precipitation had lower CO2 emissions, at 0.92 kg kg−1 rPP, and the most promising economic performance. A novel process using supercritical propane as the solvent achieved the lowest emissions of 0.32 kg kg−1 rPP with similar economic performance to the temperature-dependent separation process. The environmental competitiveness (in terms of CO2 emissions) of these recycling processes is further investigated by comparison with alternative state-of-the-art methods of plastic waste disposal, including mechanical recycling, gasification, and incineration with thermal recovery. Sensitivity studies were carried out to explore the effect of the waste plastic feed composition resulting from different preparation (sorting) methods on the economic and environmental performance of the three solvent-based recycling processes. The results obtained from this study are expected to provide valuable insights for constructing a green and cost-effective PP recycling process toward a circular economy.
期刊介绍:
Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.