Estimating dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds from food grade plastics†

IF 4.4 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental science. Advances Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1039/D4VA00195H
Kara B. Loudon, Thane M. Z. Tomy, Erin C. Liebzeit, Thor Halldorson, Zhe Xia, Sara Sambanthan, Duc Luong Hoang, Nipuni Vitharana and Gregg T. Tomy
{"title":"Estimating dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic compounds from food grade plastics†","authors":"Kara B. Loudon, Thane M. Z. Tomy, Erin C. Liebzeit, Thor Halldorson, Zhe Xia, Sara Sambanthan, Duc Luong Hoang, Nipuni Vitharana and Gregg T. Tomy","doi":"10.1039/D4VA00195H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Plastics are extensively involved in our everyday lives, including use as food storage containers. Greater than 95% of plastics produced are derived from petrochemicals. Numerous studies have shown that chemical additives (<em>e.g.</em>, phthalates) can migrate out of food grade plastics into foods. Based on this we hypothesize that petrochemicals used in the manufacturer of plastics also migrate into foods. To test this hypothesis, we simulated chemical migration from petrochemical-based plastics under refrigeration and microwave conditions using the United States Food and Drug Administration testing guidelines. Specifically, we measured the amounts of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) migrating from four plastics used heavily in the food industry namely polypropylene, polyethylene, polycarbonate and polyethylene terephthalate glycol. Our results showed that several alkylated and non-alkylated PACs could be detected in the food simulant used with relatively greater amounts of the alkylated PACs compared to their non-alkylated analogs. Data from our studies were used to estimate daily intake where it was shown that the greatest risk of exposure to humans stems from migration of PACs from PE into foods with total EDIs of 1794.4 ± 163.5 and 169.4 ± 23.5 ng per person per day under refrigeration and microwave conditions, respectively. Finally, an assessment of human health risk resulting from dietary exposure to PACs migrating from the four plastics studied under the two usage scenarios, suggests that at current exposure levels, PACs pose negligible cancer risk to humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":72941,"journal":{"name":"Environmental science. Advances","volume":" 2","pages":" 292-305"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/va/d4va00195h?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental science. Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/va/d4va00195h","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plastics are extensively involved in our everyday lives, including use as food storage containers. Greater than 95% of plastics produced are derived from petrochemicals. Numerous studies have shown that chemical additives (e.g., phthalates) can migrate out of food grade plastics into foods. Based on this we hypothesize that petrochemicals used in the manufacturer of plastics also migrate into foods. To test this hypothesis, we simulated chemical migration from petrochemical-based plastics under refrigeration and microwave conditions using the United States Food and Drug Administration testing guidelines. Specifically, we measured the amounts of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PACs) migrating from four plastics used heavily in the food industry namely polypropylene, polyethylene, polycarbonate and polyethylene terephthalate glycol. Our results showed that several alkylated and non-alkylated PACs could be detected in the food simulant used with relatively greater amounts of the alkylated PACs compared to their non-alkylated analogs. Data from our studies were used to estimate daily intake where it was shown that the greatest risk of exposure to humans stems from migration of PACs from PE into foods with total EDIs of 1794.4 ± 163.5 and 169.4 ± 23.5 ng per person per day under refrigeration and microwave conditions, respectively. Finally, an assessment of human health risk resulting from dietary exposure to PACs migrating from the four plastics studied under the two usage scenarios, suggests that at current exposure levels, PACs pose negligible cancer risk to humans.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计食品塑料中多环芳香族化合物的膳食暴露量†
塑料广泛存在于我们的日常生活中,包括用作食品储存容器。超过95%的塑料制品来自石油化工产品。大量研究表明,化学添加剂(如邻苯二甲酸盐)可以从食品级塑料中迁移到食品中。基于此,我们假设塑料制造商使用的石化产品也会迁移到食品中。为了验证这一假设,我们使用美国食品和药物管理局的测试指南,模拟了石化塑料在冷藏和微波条件下的化学迁移。具体来说,我们测量了从食品工业中大量使用的四种塑料(聚丙烯、聚乙烯、聚碳酸酯和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯)迁移的多环芳香族化合物(PACs)的数量。我们的研究结果表明,在使用的食品模拟剂中可以检测到几种烷基化和非烷基化的pac,与它们的非烷基化类似物相比,烷基化pac的含量相对较高。我们的研究数据用于估计每日摄入量,结果表明,在冷藏和微波条件下,人体暴露的最大风险来自于pac从PE迁移到食品中,总EDIs分别为每人每天1794.4±163.5和169.4±23.5 ng。最后,对在两种使用情景下通过饮食接触从所研究的四种塑料中迁移而来的聚丙烯腈造成的人类健康风险进行的评估表明,在目前的接触水平下,聚丙烯腈对人类的癌症风险可以忽略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spectroscopic investigation of the effects of simulated open waste burning on the functional and surface chemistry of commercial polystyrene. Chronic PFOA and PFOS exposure triggers cellular oxidative stress and alters lipid levels as revealed through multi-omics analysis. High resolution porewater profiling of methylmercury with a novel equilibrium passive sampler. Preparation of irregularly shaped, nano-sized, fluorescent microplastic particles for tracing cellular uptake Increasing PFAS concentrations in human serum correlate with elevated blood lipid levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1