Characteristics of lithic artifact weathering at the Semizbugu surface site complex in semi-arid Central Kazakhstan

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s12520-025-02172-z
Emily Coco, Patrick Schimdt, Bin Hu, Alice Rodriguez, Talgat B. Mamirov, Timothy G. Bromage, Radu Iovita
{"title":"Characteristics of lithic artifact weathering at the Semizbugu surface site complex in semi-arid Central Kazakhstan","authors":"Emily Coco,&nbsp;Patrick Schimdt,&nbsp;Bin Hu,&nbsp;Alice Rodriguez,&nbsp;Talgat B. Mamirov,&nbsp;Timothy G. Bromage,&nbsp;Radu Iovita","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02172-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rock surface alterations due to weathering have often been used by archaeologists for creating chronologies, studying climatic conditions, and authenticating artifacts. Rock surface alterations are also important for identifying recycled artifacts through the presence of “double patina.” In the surface archaeological deposits at Semizbugu (Saryarqa, Kazakhstan), rock surface weathering stages are used to chronologically categorize stone tool artifacts based on perceived associations between weathering characteristics and typology. Despite a long history of studying rock surface weathering in geological sciences, the formation of rock coatings on stone tool artifacts is a largely misunderstood process due to its complexity and multi-factored formation process. Given the consistent use of one raw material at Semizbugu, we test for differences in rock coating morphologies, elemental composition, and surface roughness between macroscopically identified weathering stages. Based on our analyses, we identify multiple processes involved in artifact weathering at Semizbugu. We suggest that artifacts at Semizbugu may be relatively chronologically ordered based on a combined assessment of decreased surface roughness and increased surface pitting, both of which are likely related to degree of wind abrasion and dissolution of the artifact surface. We also recommend against using rock varnish color for chronological assessment of artifacts at Semizbugu given the destructive effects of abrasion and the irregularities of varnish formation in semi-arid contexts. Additionally, we suggest this model be validated with rock surface exposure dating via optically stimulated luminescence (OSL-surf). Furthermore, rock surface exposure OSL dating could give us insight into the time-depth between use and recycling events in a more meaningful way than trying to compare differential artifact surface weathering across “double patina.”</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02172-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rock surface alterations due to weathering have often been used by archaeologists for creating chronologies, studying climatic conditions, and authenticating artifacts. Rock surface alterations are also important for identifying recycled artifacts through the presence of “double patina.” In the surface archaeological deposits at Semizbugu (Saryarqa, Kazakhstan), rock surface weathering stages are used to chronologically categorize stone tool artifacts based on perceived associations between weathering characteristics and typology. Despite a long history of studying rock surface weathering in geological sciences, the formation of rock coatings on stone tool artifacts is a largely misunderstood process due to its complexity and multi-factored formation process. Given the consistent use of one raw material at Semizbugu, we test for differences in rock coating morphologies, elemental composition, and surface roughness between macroscopically identified weathering stages. Based on our analyses, we identify multiple processes involved in artifact weathering at Semizbugu. We suggest that artifacts at Semizbugu may be relatively chronologically ordered based on a combined assessment of decreased surface roughness and increased surface pitting, both of which are likely related to degree of wind abrasion and dissolution of the artifact surface. We also recommend against using rock varnish color for chronological assessment of artifacts at Semizbugu given the destructive effects of abrasion and the irregularities of varnish formation in semi-arid contexts. Additionally, we suggest this model be validated with rock surface exposure dating via optically stimulated luminescence (OSL-surf). Furthermore, rock surface exposure OSL dating could give us insight into the time-depth between use and recycling events in a more meaningful way than trying to compare differential artifact surface weathering across “double patina.”

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈萨克斯坦中部半干旱地区Semizbugu地表遗址复合体岩质人工风化特征
由于风化作用导致的岩石表面变化经常被考古学家用来制作年表、研究气候条件和鉴定文物。通过“双重铜绿”的存在,岩石表面的变化对于识别回收文物也很重要。在Semizbugu (Saryarqa, Kazakhstan)的地表考古沉积物中,岩石表面风化阶段被用来根据风化特征和类型学之间的关联对石器文物进行年代分类。尽管地质科学对岩石表面风化的研究历史悠久,但由于石器制品上岩石涂层的形成过程复杂且多因素,因此在很大程度上被误解。考虑到在Semizbugu始终使用一种原材料,我们测试了岩石涂层形态、元素组成和宏观风化阶段之间表面粗糙度的差异。根据我们的分析,我们确定了半水谷人工风化的多个过程。我们认为,基于对表面粗糙度降低和表面麻点增加的综合评估,Semizbugu的人工制品可能相对按时间顺序排列,这两者都可能与人工制品表面的风蚀和溶解程度有关。我们还建议不要使用岩石清漆的颜色来对半干旱环境下的文物进行年代评估,因为磨损和清漆形成的不规则性具有破坏性。此外,我们建议通过光激发光(ls -surf)对岩石表面暴露年代进行验证。此外,岩石表面暴露OSL测年可以让我们以更有意义的方式了解使用和回收事件之间的时间深度,而不是试图比较“双重铜绿”的不同人工制品表面风化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
期刊最新文献
Long term dynamics in a mediterranean mountainous landscape. Exploring land use and social strategies in Varica Virtudes (2nd-1st millennia BCE, Southeastern Iberia) Middle Bronze Age axes from the eastern Adriatic: towards the reconstruction of copper supply networks in the 2nd millennium BC Technological continuity amidst cultural transformation: pottery production at the late Neolithic Miaoliang Site, Northern China Neotaphonomic insights from modern owl pellets in the Ararat Depression (Armenia): Implications for Middle Paleolithic microvertebrate accumulations Adaptations in ancient oasis woodlands of the hyper-arid Tarim Basin, Northwestern China: charcoal and coprolite analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1