SOC estimation of high capacity NMC lithium-ion battery using ensemble Kalman Bucy filter

IF 2.4 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL Ionics Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1007/s11581-024-06034-x
Mohamed R. Zaki, Mohamed A. El-Beltagy, Ahmed E. Hammad
{"title":"SOC estimation of high capacity NMC lithium-ion battery using ensemble Kalman Bucy filter","authors":"Mohamed R. Zaki,&nbsp;Mohamed A. El-Beltagy,&nbsp;Ahmed E. Hammad","doi":"10.1007/s11581-024-06034-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) lithium-ion batteries are widely used in electric vehicles due to their high energy density and long lifespan. Accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation is crucial for improving battery performance and efficiency. This paper models the battery using a 2-RC equivalent circuit and evaluates three SOC estimation methods: particle filter (PF), Ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF), and deterministic ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (DEnKBF). The results show that DEnKBF achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.6 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.8 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup>, while EnKBF achieves a slightly lower MAE of 1.5 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> with the same RMSE. In contrast, PF demonstrates higher errors, with a MAE of 4.3 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> and an RMSE of 4.8 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup>, indicating lower accuracy. Furthermore, the performance of EnKBF and DEnKBF improves at higher temperatures, with DEnKBF achieving a MAE of 6.9 × 10⁻<sup>4</sup> and an RMSE of 1.2 × 10<sup>–3</sup> at 50 °C, compared to 2.23 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> and 2.41 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup>, respectively, at − 5 °C. Similarly, EnKBF achieves a MAE of 9.3 × 10⁻<sup>4</sup> and an RMSE of 1.06 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> at 50 °C, improving from 3.66 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> to 3.86 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup> at − 5 °C. Computationally, DEnKBF and EnKBF exhibit efficient performance with execution times of approximately 0.0126 ms and 0.0136 ms per cycle, respectively, compared to the PF method, which requires 0.0482 ms per cycle. This work introduces the novelty of using the ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF) and deterministic ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (DEnKBF) for SOC estimation, achieving superior accuracy and efficiency over the particle filter (PF). These methods offer a robust and practical solution for real-time battery management in electric vehicles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":599,"journal":{"name":"Ionics","volume":"31 2","pages":"1451 - 1465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ionics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-024-06034-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) lithium-ion batteries are widely used in electric vehicles due to their high energy density and long lifespan. Accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation is crucial for improving battery performance and efficiency. This paper models the battery using a 2-RC equivalent circuit and evaluates three SOC estimation methods: particle filter (PF), Ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF), and deterministic ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (DEnKBF). The results show that DEnKBF achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.6 × 10⁻3 and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.8 × 10⁻3, while EnKBF achieves a slightly lower MAE of 1.5 × 10⁻3 with the same RMSE. In contrast, PF demonstrates higher errors, with a MAE of 4.3 × 10⁻3 and an RMSE of 4.8 × 10⁻3, indicating lower accuracy. Furthermore, the performance of EnKBF and DEnKBF improves at higher temperatures, with DEnKBF achieving a MAE of 6.9 × 10⁻4 and an RMSE of 1.2 × 10–3 at 50 °C, compared to 2.23 × 10⁻3 and 2.41 × 10⁻3, respectively, at − 5 °C. Similarly, EnKBF achieves a MAE of 9.3 × 10⁻4 and an RMSE of 1.06 × 10⁻3 at 50 °C, improving from 3.66 × 10⁻3 to 3.86 × 10⁻3 at − 5 °C. Computationally, DEnKBF and EnKBF exhibit efficient performance with execution times of approximately 0.0126 ms and 0.0136 ms per cycle, respectively, compared to the PF method, which requires 0.0482 ms per cycle. This work introduces the novelty of using the ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (EnKBF) and deterministic ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter (DEnKBF) for SOC estimation, achieving superior accuracy and efficiency over the particle filter (PF). These methods offer a robust and practical solution for real-time battery management in electric vehicles.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ionics
Ionics 化学-电化学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Ionics is publishing original results in the fields of science and technology of ionic motion. This includes theoretical, experimental and practical work on electrolytes, electrode, ionic/electronic interfaces, ionic transport aspects of corrosion, galvanic cells, e.g. for thermodynamic and kinetic studies, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and electrochromics. Fast solid ionic conductors are presently providing new opportunities in view of several advantages, in addition to conventional liquid electrolytes.
期刊最新文献
The synthesis of β-MnO2 nanorods as cathode and the effect and mechanism of graphene composite on the performance of Li–MnO2 primary battery SOC estimation of high capacity NMC lithium-ion battery using ensemble Kalman Bucy filter Novel NiCo2S4 nanorod arrays grown on carbon nanofibers as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries Research progress of zinc-nickel battery anode materials: challenges and development strategies Comparative studies of the proton conductivity behavior during hydration of sulfonated perfluorinated and hydrocarbon proton exchange membranes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1