Integrating dynamic factors for predicting future landslide susceptibility

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1007/s12665-025-12094-7
Suraj Lamichhane, Arhat Ratna Kansakar, Nirajan Devkota, Bhim Kumar Dahal
{"title":"Integrating dynamic factors for predicting future landslide susceptibility","authors":"Suraj Lamichhane,&nbsp;Arhat Ratna Kansakar,&nbsp;Nirajan Devkota,&nbsp;Bhim Kumar Dahal","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12094-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integrating dynamic factors such as rainfall and land use/cover (LULC) changes into landslide predictions is often overlooked. A combination of aforementioned dynamic factors, mountainous terrain and fragile geology increase risk of landslides in the Himalayan region. This study assesses the impact of both dynamic and static factors on landslide prediction. The XGBoost machine learning (ML) algorithm is employed for generating landslide susceptibility maps due to its superior performance and accuracy in the study area. Base map is prepared for the period from 1995 to 2020, taking into account significant changes in urbanization and climatic impacts observed in the study area. Results suggest that the ML algorithm performs well based on metrics such as accuracy (96.6%), precision (98.4%), recall (94.8%), Matthew’s correlation coefficient (93.2%), Cohen’s kappa coefficient (92%), F1 score (96.6%), and area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (99.3%). For future landslide susceptibility predictions, maps under different climate change scenarios are prepared using rainfall alone and both rainfall and LULC as dynamic factors. Results indicate an increase in high and very high susceptibility classes; the most significant increase (approximately 60% of the baseline) is observed in scenarios considering both the dynamic factors. It infers that including dynamic parameters in landslide prediction enhances the accuracy of landslide susceptibility analysis and improves reliability of disaster management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12094-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrating dynamic factors such as rainfall and land use/cover (LULC) changes into landslide predictions is often overlooked. A combination of aforementioned dynamic factors, mountainous terrain and fragile geology increase risk of landslides in the Himalayan region. This study assesses the impact of both dynamic and static factors on landslide prediction. The XGBoost machine learning (ML) algorithm is employed for generating landslide susceptibility maps due to its superior performance and accuracy in the study area. Base map is prepared for the period from 1995 to 2020, taking into account significant changes in urbanization and climatic impacts observed in the study area. Results suggest that the ML algorithm performs well based on metrics such as accuracy (96.6%), precision (98.4%), recall (94.8%), Matthew’s correlation coefficient (93.2%), Cohen’s kappa coefficient (92%), F1 score (96.6%), and area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (99.3%). For future landslide susceptibility predictions, maps under different climate change scenarios are prepared using rainfall alone and both rainfall and LULC as dynamic factors. Results indicate an increase in high and very high susceptibility classes; the most significant increase (approximately 60% of the baseline) is observed in scenarios considering both the dynamic factors. It infers that including dynamic parameters in landslide prediction enhances the accuracy of landslide susceptibility analysis and improves reliability of disaster management strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合动力因子预测未来滑坡易感性
将降雨和土地利用/覆盖(LULC)变化等动态因素整合到滑坡预测中往往被忽视。上述动力因素、山地地形和脆弱的地质条件共同增加了喜马拉雅地区发生山体滑坡的风险。本研究评估了动态因素和静态因素对滑坡预测的影响。采用XGBoost机器学习(ML)算法生成滑坡易感性图,在研究区域具有优越的性能和精度。考虑到在研究区观测到的城市化和气候影响的重大变化,编制了1995年至2020年期间的底图。结果表明,基于准确率(96.6%)、精密度(98.4%)、召回率(94.8%)、马修相关系数(93.2%)、科恩卡帕系数(92%)、F1评分(96.6%)和接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(99.3%)等指标,ML算法表现良好。对于未来滑坡易感性的预测,在不同的气候变化情景下,以降雨为单因子,以降雨和LULC为动态因子,制作了不同情景下的滑坡易感性预测图。结果表明,高易感和极高易感人群增加;在考虑两种动态因素的情况下,观察到最显著的增加(约为基线的60%)。结果表明,将动态参数纳入滑坡预测,提高了滑坡易感性分析的准确性,提高了灾害管理策略的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-assisted soil reclamation: a rapid method for removing sodium ions from saline-sodic soils Combined hydro-meteorological drought assessment of Ganga-Brahmaputra Basin: insights of the control of total water storage anomaly in drought occurrence Effects of joint roughness and inclination on fracture behavior of jointed rock under true triaxial compression Influences of hydrometeorological factors on river water δ2H variability in the Xiangjiang River Basin Role of human activities on discharge alterations in the red river system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1