{"title":"Integrating dynamic factors for predicting future landslide susceptibility","authors":"Suraj Lamichhane, Arhat Ratna Kansakar, Nirajan Devkota, Bhim Kumar Dahal","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12094-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Integrating dynamic factors such as rainfall and land use/cover (LULC) changes into landslide predictions is often overlooked. A combination of aforementioned dynamic factors, mountainous terrain and fragile geology increase risk of landslides in the Himalayan region. This study assesses the impact of both dynamic and static factors on landslide prediction. The XGBoost machine learning (ML) algorithm is employed for generating landslide susceptibility maps due to its superior performance and accuracy in the study area. Base map is prepared for the period from 1995 to 2020, taking into account significant changes in urbanization and climatic impacts observed in the study area. Results suggest that the ML algorithm performs well based on metrics such as accuracy (96.6%), precision (98.4%), recall (94.8%), Matthew’s correlation coefficient (93.2%), Cohen’s kappa coefficient (92%), F1 score (96.6%), and area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (99.3%). For future landslide susceptibility predictions, maps under different climate change scenarios are prepared using rainfall alone and both rainfall and LULC as dynamic factors. Results indicate an increase in high and very high susceptibility classes; the most significant increase (approximately 60% of the baseline) is observed in scenarios considering both the dynamic factors. It infers that including dynamic parameters in landslide prediction enhances the accuracy of landslide susceptibility analysis and improves reliability of disaster management strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12094-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integrating dynamic factors such as rainfall and land use/cover (LULC) changes into landslide predictions is often overlooked. A combination of aforementioned dynamic factors, mountainous terrain and fragile geology increase risk of landslides in the Himalayan region. This study assesses the impact of both dynamic and static factors on landslide prediction. The XGBoost machine learning (ML) algorithm is employed for generating landslide susceptibility maps due to its superior performance and accuracy in the study area. Base map is prepared for the period from 1995 to 2020, taking into account significant changes in urbanization and climatic impacts observed in the study area. Results suggest that the ML algorithm performs well based on metrics such as accuracy (96.6%), precision (98.4%), recall (94.8%), Matthew’s correlation coefficient (93.2%), Cohen’s kappa coefficient (92%), F1 score (96.6%), and area under receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve (99.3%). For future landslide susceptibility predictions, maps under different climate change scenarios are prepared using rainfall alone and both rainfall and LULC as dynamic factors. Results indicate an increase in high and very high susceptibility classes; the most significant increase (approximately 60% of the baseline) is observed in scenarios considering both the dynamic factors. It infers that including dynamic parameters in landslide prediction enhances the accuracy of landslide susceptibility analysis and improves reliability of disaster management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.