Pareto optimal robust design combining isogeometric analysis and sparse polynomial chaos: brake squeal case study

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS Archive of Applied Mechanics Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1007/s00419-024-02736-w
Achille Jacquemond, Frédéric Gillot, Koji Shimoyama, Shigeru Obayashi, Sébastien Besset
{"title":"Pareto optimal robust design combining isogeometric analysis and sparse polynomial chaos: brake squeal case study","authors":"Achille Jacquemond,&nbsp;Frédéric Gillot,&nbsp;Koji Shimoyama,&nbsp;Shigeru Obayashi,&nbsp;Sébastien Besset","doi":"10.1007/s00419-024-02736-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shape optimization is an increasingly prevalent tool for designing and manufacturing mechanical systems with gradient-free nonlinear performance metrics. Uncertainty quantification is an essential part of the process as optimality can be called into question in the presence of unavoidable discrepancies between numerical designs and manufactured parts. This paper combines isogeometric analysis (IGA) and polynomial chaos expansions (PCE) towards shape optimization of a disc brake for noise minimization under uncertainties. The proposed approach sets robustness to manufacturing uncertainties as an optimization objective in order to directly obtain robust optimal solutions. IGA is chosen over other shape design alternatives for its absence of meshing approximations, which makes it potentially more suitable in the presence of uncertainties. PCE is used to quantify robustness through the variance of the output, in an attempt to alleviate the computational burden of uncertainty quantification. The studied application is a simplified disc brake system whose shape is modified to minimize undesirable squeal noise, which is quantified through complex eigenvalue analysis. The noise prediction model, PCE model, and a genetic algorithm are then combined for the purpose of searching for robust optimal solutions. Results show the capability to converge to a Pareto front of robust noise-minimizing disc brake shapes and overall high computational efficiency compared to Monte Carlo simulation for output variance estimation. Furthermore, our findings confirm the superiority of sparse PCE methods over the classical ordinary least squares PCE method for output variance quantification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":477,"journal":{"name":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","volume":"95 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive of Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00419-024-02736-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shape optimization is an increasingly prevalent tool for designing and manufacturing mechanical systems with gradient-free nonlinear performance metrics. Uncertainty quantification is an essential part of the process as optimality can be called into question in the presence of unavoidable discrepancies between numerical designs and manufactured parts. This paper combines isogeometric analysis (IGA) and polynomial chaos expansions (PCE) towards shape optimization of a disc brake for noise minimization under uncertainties. The proposed approach sets robustness to manufacturing uncertainties as an optimization objective in order to directly obtain robust optimal solutions. IGA is chosen over other shape design alternatives for its absence of meshing approximations, which makes it potentially more suitable in the presence of uncertainties. PCE is used to quantify robustness through the variance of the output, in an attempt to alleviate the computational burden of uncertainty quantification. The studied application is a simplified disc brake system whose shape is modified to minimize undesirable squeal noise, which is quantified through complex eigenvalue analysis. The noise prediction model, PCE model, and a genetic algorithm are then combined for the purpose of searching for robust optimal solutions. Results show the capability to converge to a Pareto front of robust noise-minimizing disc brake shapes and overall high computational efficiency compared to Monte Carlo simulation for output variance estimation. Furthermore, our findings confirm the superiority of sparse PCE methods over the classical ordinary least squares PCE method for output variance quantification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archive of Applied Mechanics serves as a platform to communicate original research of scholarly value in all branches of theoretical and applied mechanics, i.e., in solid and fluid mechanics, dynamics and vibrations. It focuses on continuum mechanics in general, structural mechanics, biomechanics, micro- and nano-mechanics as well as hydrodynamics. In particular, the following topics are emphasised: thermodynamics of materials, material modeling, multi-physics, mechanical properties of materials, homogenisation, phase transitions, fracture and damage mechanics, vibration, wave propagation experimental mechanics as well as machine learning techniques in the context of applied mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Continuation fraction perturbation effect on out-of-plane equilibrium points Analysis of thermoelastic dissipation in couple stress-based beams with two-dimensional Moore–Gibson–Thompson heat conduction Modeling method for boundary conditions of the rectangular thin plate by using the power series polynomial A semi-analytical solution for the one-dimensional transient response of layered unsaturated porous media Solving Hilfer fractional dirac systems: a spectral approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1