Enhancing Self-Esteem: Evaluating the Effects of a Self-Affirmation Intervention Among Indian Adults With Subclinical Depression

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Counselling & Psychotherapy Research Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1002/capr.12892
Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Archna Choudhary, Archana Singh, Anurag Shukla, Amit Kumar Macorya, Ashutosh Pandey, Ajit Kumar Singh
{"title":"Enhancing Self-Esteem: Evaluating the Effects of a Self-Affirmation Intervention Among Indian Adults With Subclinical Depression","authors":"Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari,&nbsp;Archna Choudhary,&nbsp;Archana Singh,&nbsp;Anurag Shukla,&nbsp;Amit Kumar Macorya,&nbsp;Ashutosh Pandey,&nbsp;Ajit Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1002/capr.12892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Previous research reports self-affirmation interventions to be efficacious in enhancing many life outcomes of normal individuals, but limited research has assessed its restorative and preserving capacities to enhance and maintain the self-esteem of individuals with subclinical depressive tendencies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study employed an experimental research design. Eighty participants (age range = 22–27 years) with subclinical depression were chosen using purposive sampling and were randomly assigned in equal numbers to the experimental and control conditions and their self-esteem was measured at pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up intervals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results showed that the experimental group participants evoked significantly higher mean scores (<i>F</i>(1, 76) = 29.20, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.28) on self-esteem as compared to the control group at post-intervention (Control: Mean (<i>SD</i>) = 17.48 (2.73); Experimental: Mean (<i>SD</i>) = 51.43 (3.29)) and follow-up (Control: Mean (<i>SD</i>) = 18.28 (2.72); Experimental: Mean (<i>SD</i>) = 48.65 (3.74)). There was a significant difference in the mean scores of the self-esteem of the experimental group participants during post-intervention and follow-up (<i>F</i>(2, 152) = 6.50, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08). These findings were evident in the conditions' (experimental, control) and intervals' (pre-intervention, post-intervention, follow-up) main and interaction effects: <i>F</i>(2, 152) = 6.54, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.08; and <i>F</i>(2, 152) = 3.87, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.023, <i>η</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.05. The size of these effects ranged from very low, low, to medium (<i>η</i><sup>2</sup>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings revealed the restorative and preserving capacities of this self-affirmation intervention for self-esteem. The positive outcomes of the self-affirmation intervention may have been produced as result of the activation of meaning, positive cognitions and positive relationships.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.12892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Previous research reports self-affirmation interventions to be efficacious in enhancing many life outcomes of normal individuals, but limited research has assessed its restorative and preserving capacities to enhance and maintain the self-esteem of individuals with subclinical depressive tendencies.

Methods

This study employed an experimental research design. Eighty participants (age range = 22–27 years) with subclinical depression were chosen using purposive sampling and were randomly assigned in equal numbers to the experimental and control conditions and their self-esteem was measured at pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up intervals.

Results

Results showed that the experimental group participants evoked significantly higher mean scores (F(1, 76) = 29.20, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.28) on self-esteem as compared to the control group at post-intervention (Control: Mean (SD) = 17.48 (2.73); Experimental: Mean (SD) = 51.43 (3.29)) and follow-up (Control: Mean (SD) = 18.28 (2.72); Experimental: Mean (SD) = 48.65 (3.74)). There was a significant difference in the mean scores of the self-esteem of the experimental group participants during post-intervention and follow-up (F(2, 152) = 6.50, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.08). These findings were evident in the conditions' (experimental, control) and intervals' (pre-intervention, post-intervention, follow-up) main and interaction effects: F(2, 152) = 6.54, p < 0.002, η2 = 0.08; and F(2, 152) = 3.87, p < 0.023, η2 = 0.05. The size of these effects ranged from very low, low, to medium (η2).

Conclusion

The findings revealed the restorative and preserving capacities of this self-affirmation intervention for self-esteem. The positive outcomes of the self-affirmation intervention may have been produced as result of the activation of meaning, positive cognitions and positive relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强自尊:评估印度成人亚临床抑郁症患者自我肯定干预的效果
以往的研究表明,自我肯定干预对改善正常个体的许多生活结果是有效的,但很少有研究评估自我肯定干预对增强和维持亚临床抑郁倾向个体自尊的恢复和保存能力。方法采用实验研究设计。采用有目的抽样的方法,选取年龄22-27岁的80名亚临床抑郁症患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,分别在干预前、干预后和随访期间对其自尊进行测量。结果实验组受试者在干预后的自尊平均得分(F(1,76) = 29.20, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.28)显著高于对照组(control: mean (SD) = 17.48 (2.73);实验:均值(SD) = 51.43(3.29)),随访:对照组:均值(SD) = 18.28 (2.72);实验:平均值(SD) = 48.65(3.74))。实验组被试在干预后和随访期间的自尊平均得分差异有统计学意义(F(2,152) = 6.50, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.08)。这些结果在条件(实验、对照)和间隔(干预前、干预后、随访)的主效应和交互效应上都很明显:F(2,152) = 6.54, p < 0.002, η2 = 0.08;F(2,152) = 3.87, p < 0.023, η2 = 0.05。这些效应的大小范围从极低、低到中等(η2)。结论本研究揭示了自我肯定干预对自尊的恢复和保存能力。自我肯定干预的积极结果可能是激活意义、积极认知和积极关系的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Impact of Autism-Informed Integrative Counselling and Coaching on the Workplace Experiences of Autistic Individuals: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis ‘Trusting the Darkness’: An Exploration of Experiences of Professional Self-Doubt Among Qualified Psychotherapists Reimagining Mental Health Support: The Role of AI Chatbots in Bridging Gaps and Raising Ethical Questions Counsellors Attitudes, Emotions, and Ethical Concerns Regarding Artificial Intelligence: Results From a Professional Survey The Use of the Wright-Constantine Structured Cultural Interview (WCSCI) in Culturally Responsive Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Study of Clients' Experiences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1