Is It the (Sexist) Company You're Keeping? Examining the Connection Between Psychological Health and Perceptions of Sexism Endorsement in One's Personal Network
C. Veronica Smith, Caitlin M. Shaw, Camilla S. Øverup
{"title":"Is It the (Sexist) Company You're Keeping? Examining the Connection Between Psychological Health and Perceptions of Sexism Endorsement in One's Personal Network","authors":"C. Veronica Smith, Caitlin M. Shaw, Camilla S. Øverup","doi":"10.1002/casp.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ambivalent sexism theory proposes that people endorse both positive/benevolent and negative/hostile views towards both women and men. Although some work has examined the effects of endorsing these views, no work to date has examined whether the perceived sexist beliefs of one's personal network are connected to one's own psychological health. Using a sample of American adults (<i>N</i> = 273), the current study used a novel methodology designed to assess the perceptions of the sexism in one's personal network (e.g., friends, co-workers, romantic partners, family members), along with multiple measures of psychological health. Results suggest that perceived network hostile sexism towards women was associated with lower well-being and greater distress, but perceived network benevolence towards women was associated with higher life satisfaction. Unexpectedly, perceiving one's network to endorse more hostile sexism towards men than oneself was associated with lower levels of distress and higher well-being. Results were mostly consistent for both men and women.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ambivalent sexism theory proposes that people endorse both positive/benevolent and negative/hostile views towards both women and men. Although some work has examined the effects of endorsing these views, no work to date has examined whether the perceived sexist beliefs of one's personal network are connected to one's own psychological health. Using a sample of American adults (N = 273), the current study used a novel methodology designed to assess the perceptions of the sexism in one's personal network (e.g., friends, co-workers, romantic partners, family members), along with multiple measures of psychological health. Results suggest that perceived network hostile sexism towards women was associated with lower well-being and greater distress, but perceived network benevolence towards women was associated with higher life satisfaction. Unexpectedly, perceiving one's network to endorse more hostile sexism towards men than oneself was associated with lower levels of distress and higher well-being. Results were mostly consistent for both men and women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.