Is It the (Sexist) Company You're Keeping? Examining the Connection Between Psychological Health and Perceptions of Sexism Endorsement in One's Personal Network

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1002/casp.70045
C. Veronica Smith, Caitlin M. Shaw, Camilla S. Øverup
{"title":"Is It the (Sexist) Company You're Keeping? Examining the Connection Between Psychological Health and Perceptions of Sexism Endorsement in One's Personal Network","authors":"C. Veronica Smith,&nbsp;Caitlin M. Shaw,&nbsp;Camilla S. Øverup","doi":"10.1002/casp.70045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ambivalent sexism theory proposes that people endorse both positive/benevolent and negative/hostile views towards both women and men. Although some work has examined the effects of endorsing these views, no work to date has examined whether the perceived sexist beliefs of one's personal network are connected to one's own psychological health. Using a sample of American adults (<i>N</i> = 273), the current study used a novel methodology designed to assess the perceptions of the sexism in one's personal network (e.g., friends, co-workers, romantic partners, family members), along with multiple measures of psychological health. Results suggest that perceived network hostile sexism towards women was associated with lower well-being and greater distress, but perceived network benevolence towards women was associated with higher life satisfaction. Unexpectedly, perceiving one's network to endorse more hostile sexism towards men than oneself was associated with lower levels of distress and higher well-being. Results were mostly consistent for both men and women.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ambivalent sexism theory proposes that people endorse both positive/benevolent and negative/hostile views towards both women and men. Although some work has examined the effects of endorsing these views, no work to date has examined whether the perceived sexist beliefs of one's personal network are connected to one's own psychological health. Using a sample of American adults (N = 273), the current study used a novel methodology designed to assess the perceptions of the sexism in one's personal network (e.g., friends, co-workers, romantic partners, family members), along with multiple measures of psychological health. Results suggest that perceived network hostile sexism towards women was associated with lower well-being and greater distress, but perceived network benevolence towards women was associated with higher life satisfaction. Unexpectedly, perceiving one's network to endorse more hostile sexism towards men than oneself was associated with lower levels of distress and higher well-being. Results were mostly consistent for both men and women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是你的(性别歧视)公司吗?心理健康与个人网络性别歧视认同认知的关系研究
矛盾性别歧视理论认为,人们对女性和男性都持积极/仁慈和消极/敌对的观点。尽管一些研究已经研究了赞同这些观点的影响,但迄今为止还没有研究过个人网络中感知到的性别歧视信念是否与自己的心理健康有关。目前的研究以美国成年人为样本(N = 273),采用了一种新颖的方法,旨在评估一个人的个人网络(例如,朋友、同事、恋人、家庭成员)对性别歧视的看法,并采用多种心理健康措施。结果表明,对女性的网络敌意性别歧视感知与较低的幸福感和较大的痛苦相关,而对女性的网络仁慈感知与较高的生活满意度相关。出乎意料的是,感知到自己的网络比自己更支持对男性的敌意性别歧视,与更低的痛苦水平和更高的幸福感相关。男性和女性的结果基本一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
When Opportunity Fails: A Qualitative Exploration of Pathways to Homelessness Among Central and Eastern European Labour Migrants in the Netherlands Gender Stereotypes and Professional Aspirations, Interests and Choices: A Systematic Review Gendered Barriers and Dressing Rituals: The Role of the Uniform in Becoming Women Prison Officers in Men's Prisons How Neighbourhood Environments Shape Resident Experiences Within Recovery Housing: A Case Study Analysis in Two Texas Cities The Digital Campfire: Ritualized Linguistic Practices and Leadership Among Facebook Group Administrators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1