Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy Levels Among Turkish Parents in 2024 After Pandemic; Key Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1155/ijcp/5511192
Zehra Kılınç, Songül Beycur Işık
{"title":"Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy Levels Among Turkish Parents in 2024 After Pandemic; Key Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Zehra Kılınç,&nbsp;Songül Beycur Işık","doi":"10.1155/ijcp/5511192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the level of vaccine hesitancy and related factors regarding childhood vaccines among parents with children under 5 years of age receiving services from a health center in Turkey.</p>\n <p><b>Materials and Methods:</b> This cross-sectional study was conducted with parents with children under 5 years of age who applied to a primary care family health center in Diyarbakır province between 1 November and 1 December 2023. The number of children under 5 years of age registered at the family health center was approximately 800, and the minimum sample size was calculated as 219 using the Open Epi program with a 13% vaccine hesitancy frequency, 99% confidence interval, and 80% power. A total of 214 parents who had no communication problems and voluntarily agreed to participate were included in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a data form including demographic information of parents and their children, vaccination knowledge, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccination attitudes, and the Parents’ Attitudes Toward Childhood Vaccines Scale (PACV) Scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS (Version 24.0).</p>\n <p><b>Findings:</b> The mean age of the participants was 32.2 ± 5.9 years, 73.4% were mothers, 70.1% and 62.6% of their spouses had high school education or less, and 60.7% were not employed. A total of 65.9% of the parents were at the middle-income level and 76.6% stated that they had sufficient knowledge about child vaccines. They mostly received vaccine information from family health center nurses or physicians (84.1%). The vaccine hesitation rate was 16.8% and the PACV Scale’s mean score was 34.38 ± 15.60. No significant difference was found between the hesitation levels of the parents. While the rate of hesitation was 36.1% in parents with sufficient knowledge about vaccination, this rate was 63.9% in those with insufficient knowledge, and this difference was found to be statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.01). In addition, vaccine hesitancy was found to be higher in parents who did not have a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the vaccination decision. Parents with university and higher education level had higher and statistically significant safety-effectiveness scale subdimension scores (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> In this study, vaccine hesitation was found in 16.8% of the parents and the level of hesitation was found to be associated with knowledge and education levels. The hesitation rate was found to be lower in parents who had sufficient knowledge about childhood vaccines. The higher hesitation levels of parents who reported that the pandemic did not negatively affect their vaccination decisions suggest the effect of social and psychological factors. The findings emphasize the importance of education and awareness-raising activities for parents to reduce vaccine hesitancy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ijcp/5511192","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ijcp/5511192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the level of vaccine hesitancy and related factors regarding childhood vaccines among parents with children under 5 years of age receiving services from a health center in Turkey.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with parents with children under 5 years of age who applied to a primary care family health center in Diyarbakır province between 1 November and 1 December 2023. The number of children under 5 years of age registered at the family health center was approximately 800, and the minimum sample size was calculated as 219 using the Open Epi program with a 13% vaccine hesitancy frequency, 99% confidence interval, and 80% power. A total of 214 parents who had no communication problems and voluntarily agreed to participate were included in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a data form including demographic information of parents and their children, vaccination knowledge, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccination attitudes, and the Parents’ Attitudes Toward Childhood Vaccines Scale (PACV) Scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS (Version 24.0).

Findings: The mean age of the participants was 32.2 ± 5.9 years, 73.4% were mothers, 70.1% and 62.6% of their spouses had high school education or less, and 60.7% were not employed. A total of 65.9% of the parents were at the middle-income level and 76.6% stated that they had sufficient knowledge about child vaccines. They mostly received vaccine information from family health center nurses or physicians (84.1%). The vaccine hesitation rate was 16.8% and the PACV Scale’s mean score was 34.38 ± 15.60. No significant difference was found between the hesitation levels of the parents. While the rate of hesitation was 36.1% in parents with sufficient knowledge about vaccination, this rate was 63.9% in those with insufficient knowledge, and this difference was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.01). In addition, vaccine hesitancy was found to be higher in parents who did not have a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the vaccination decision. Parents with university and higher education level had higher and statistically significant safety-effectiveness scale subdimension scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this study, vaccine hesitation was found in 16.8% of the parents and the level of hesitation was found to be associated with knowledge and education levels. The hesitation rate was found to be lower in parents who had sufficient knowledge about childhood vaccines. The higher hesitation levels of parents who reported that the pandemic did not negatively affect their vaccination decisions suggest the effect of social and psychological factors. The findings emphasize the importance of education and awareness-raising activities for parents to reduce vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
The Association of Diet With High Phosphatemic Index With Odds of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Exploring Vaccine Hesitancy Levels Among Turkish Parents in 2024 After Pandemic; Key Influencing Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study Sleep-Breath–Related Characteristics in Males With Chronic Rhinosinusitis The Impact of Silymarin on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Clinical Subtypes and Prognostic Outcomes of Rhabdomyolysis in ICU Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1