Experimental, economic, and life cycle carbon footprint assessment of low-cost adsorbents for siloxane removal from landfill gas

IF 2.3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1002/ep.14534
Rarosue J. Amaraibi, Bryce Reynolds, Babu Joseph, John N. Kuhn
{"title":"Experimental, economic, and life cycle carbon footprint assessment of low-cost adsorbents for siloxane removal from landfill gas","authors":"Rarosue J. Amaraibi,&nbsp;Bryce Reynolds,&nbsp;Babu Joseph,&nbsp;John N. Kuhn","doi":"10.1002/ep.14534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Siloxane impurities in landfill gas (LFG) pose a significant challenge for downstream processing equipment used in energy recovery. This study investigated the adsorption capacity, cost, and environmental impact of five low-cost adsorbent materials: biochar, clinoptilolite, hydrochar, diatomaceous-earth, and crushed glass. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the adsorption capacity of these materials for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). The results were then used to conduct a technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the selected adsorbents with activated carbon (AC), a commonly used adsorbent for siloxane removal. The TEA revealed that the cost of LFG purification with clinoptilolite, biochar, and AC was $0.035, $0.034, and $0.033/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively, for the base case studied. The cradle-to-gate LCA showed that clinoptilolite had significantly lower carbon emissions compared with the other adsorbents, both per kg of D4 captured and per kg of adsorbent produced. The potential fate of siloxanes after adsorption was discussed, emphasizing the importance of proper treatment and disposal of spent adsorbents. Surface modification techniques were recommended to enhance the adsorption capacity and regeneration of clinoptilolite, potentially reducing cost and carbon emissions in LFG purification. These findings highlight the potential of low-cost adsorbents for sustainable LFG purification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11701,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://aiche.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ep.14534","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Siloxane impurities in landfill gas (LFG) pose a significant challenge for downstream processing equipment used in energy recovery. This study investigated the adsorption capacity, cost, and environmental impact of five low-cost adsorbent materials: biochar, clinoptilolite, hydrochar, diatomaceous-earth, and crushed glass. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the adsorption capacity of these materials for octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4). The results were then used to conduct a technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), comparing the selected adsorbents with activated carbon (AC), a commonly used adsorbent for siloxane removal. The TEA revealed that the cost of LFG purification with clinoptilolite, biochar, and AC was $0.035, $0.034, and $0.033/m3, respectively, for the base case studied. The cradle-to-gate LCA showed that clinoptilolite had significantly lower carbon emissions compared with the other adsorbents, both per kg of D4 captured and per kg of adsorbent produced. The potential fate of siloxanes after adsorption was discussed, emphasizing the importance of proper treatment and disposal of spent adsorbents. Surface modification techniques were recommended to enhance the adsorption capacity and regeneration of clinoptilolite, potentially reducing cost and carbon emissions in LFG purification. These findings highlight the potential of low-cost adsorbents for sustainable LFG purification.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从填埋气中去除硅氧烷的低成本吸附剂的实验、经济和生命周期碳足迹评估
垃圾填埋气中的硅氧烷杂质对用于能量回收的下游处理设备提出了重大挑战。本研究考察了五种低成本吸附剂材料:生物炭、斜沸石、水炭、硅藻土和碎玻璃的吸附能力、成本和环境影响。用重量分析法测定了这些材料对八甲基环四硅氧烷(D4)的吸附量。然后将结果用于进行技术经济分析(TEA)和生命周期评估(LCA),并将所选吸附剂与活性炭(AC)(一种常用的硅氧烷吸附剂)进行比较。TEA显示,在基本情况下,用斜沸石、生物炭和活性炭净化LFG的成本分别为0.035美元、0.034美元和0.033美元/立方米。从摇篮到门的LCA表明,与其他吸附剂相比,斜发沸石的碳排放量显著降低,无论是每千克捕获的D4还是每千克生产的吸附剂。讨论了硅氧烷吸附后的潜在命运,强调了正确处理和处置废吸附剂的重要性。建议采用表面改性技术来提高斜沸石的吸附能力和再生能力,从而有可能降低LFG净化的成本和碳排放。这些发现突出了低成本吸附剂在可持续LFG净化方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 环境科学-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Progress , a quarterly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, reports on critical issues like remediation and treatment of solid or aqueous wastes, air pollution, sustainability, and sustainable energy. Each issue helps chemical engineers (and those in related fields) stay on top of technological advances in all areas associated with the environment through feature articles, updates, book and software reviews, and editorials.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Info for Authors Issue Information - Cover and Table of Contents Vanillin production from lignin depolymerization by acidic deep eutectic solvent and its possible mechanism The industrialization paradox under energy-transition policies: Do ICT, economic growth and natural resource rents promote renewable energy adoption? Sustainable productivity enhancement of conical solar distillers using Peanut Shell bio-waste: Energy and economic analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1