Andrea Tonini, Francesco Regazzoni, Matteo Salvador, Luca Dede', Roberto Scrofani, Laura Fusini, Chiara Cogliati, Gianluca Pontone, Christian Vergara, Alfio Quarteroni
{"title":"Two New Calibration Techniques of Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Models for the Cardiovascular System","authors":"Andrea Tonini, Francesco Regazzoni, Matteo Salvador, Luca Dede', Roberto Scrofani, Laura Fusini, Chiara Cogliati, Gianluca Pontone, Christian Vergara, Alfio Quarteroni","doi":"10.1002/nme.7648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nme.7648","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.
循环数学模型是研究循环系统生理和病理状况的有价值的工具。为了评估个人的临床状况,这些模型必须通过参数校准来定制。本文提出了一种新的集总参数循环模型的标定方法,利用模型参数与输出之间的相关矩阵,根据观测数据对输出进行调整。我们评估了我们的方法的性能,无论是独立的还是与L-BFGS-B优化算法(有限内存Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno with Bound约束)结合,并将我们的结果与L-BFGS-B单独的结果进行了比较。综合数据表明,与L-BFGS-B相比,相关矩阵定标法和组合定标法都能更有效地减小优化问题的损失函数。相关矩阵定标方法对初始参数猜测的鲁棒性优于组合方法和L-BFGS-B方法。当应用于有噪声的数据时,所有三种校准方法都获得了可比的结果。尽管相关矩阵校准方法产生的参数估计不如L-BFGS-B准确,但在实际临床病例中,这两种新的校准方法提供的临床见解与L-BFGS-B相当。值得注意的是,相关矩阵校准方法比其他两种校准方法快3倍。这些发现突出了我们的新校准方法在临床应用中的有效性。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering publishes original papers describing significant, novel developments in numerical methods that are applicable to engineering problems.
The Journal is known for welcoming contributions in a wide range of areas in computational engineering, including computational issues in model reduction, uncertainty quantification, verification and validation, inverse analysis and stochastic methods, optimisation, element technology, solution techniques and parallel computing, damage and fracture, mechanics at micro and nano-scales, low-speed fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction, electromagnetics, coupled diffusion phenomena, and error estimation and mesh generation. It is emphasized that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and particularly papers on multi-scale, multi-physics or multi-disciplinary problems, and on new, emerging topics are welcome.