Two New Calibration Techniques of Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Models for the Cardiovascular System

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1002/nme.7648
Andrea Tonini, Francesco Regazzoni, Matteo Salvador, Luca Dede', Roberto Scrofani, Laura Fusini, Chiara Cogliati, Gianluca Pontone, Christian Vergara, Alfio Quarteroni
{"title":"Two New Calibration Techniques of Lumped-Parameter Mathematical Models for the Cardiovascular System","authors":"Andrea Tonini,&nbsp;Francesco Regazzoni,&nbsp;Matteo Salvador,&nbsp;Luca Dede',&nbsp;Roberto Scrofani,&nbsp;Laura Fusini,&nbsp;Chiara Cogliati,&nbsp;Gianluca Pontone,&nbsp;Christian Vergara,&nbsp;Alfio Quarteroni","doi":"10.1002/nme.7648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13699,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","volume":"126 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nme.7648","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nme.7648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiocirculatory mathematical models are valuable tools for investigating both physiological and pathological conditions of the circulatory system. To assess an individual's clinical condition, these models must be tailored through parameter calibration. This study introduces a novel calibration method for a lumped-parameter cardiocirculatory model, by leveraging on the correlation matrix between model parameters and outputs to adjust the latter based on observed data. We evaluate the performance of our method, both independently and in combination with the L-BFGS-B optimization algorithm (Limited memory Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno with Bound constraints), and we compare our results with those of L-BFGS-B alone. Using synthetic data, we show that both the correlation matrix calibration method and the combined one reduce the loss function of the optimization problem more effectively than L-BFGS-B. Moreover, the correlation matrix calibration method exhibits greater robustness to the initial parameter guess than both the combined method and L-BFGS-B. When applied to noisy data, all three calibration methods achieve comparable results. Although the correlation matrix calibration method yields less accurate parameter estimates than L-BFGS-B, in a real-world clinical case, the two new calibration methods provide clinical insights comparable to L-BFGS-B. Notably, the correlation matrix calibration method is three times faster than the other two calibration methods. These findings highlight the effectiveness of our new calibration method for clinical applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心血管系统集总参数数学模型的两种新的标定技术
循环数学模型是研究循环系统生理和病理状况的有价值的工具。为了评估个人的临床状况,这些模型必须通过参数校准来定制。本文提出了一种新的集总参数循环模型的标定方法,利用模型参数与输出之间的相关矩阵,根据观测数据对输出进行调整。我们评估了我们的方法的性能,无论是独立的还是与L-BFGS-B优化算法(有限内存Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno with Bound约束)结合,并将我们的结果与L-BFGS-B单独的结果进行了比较。综合数据表明,与L-BFGS-B相比,相关矩阵定标法和组合定标法都能更有效地减小优化问题的损失函数。相关矩阵定标方法对初始参数猜测的鲁棒性优于组合方法和L-BFGS-B方法。当应用于有噪声的数据时,所有三种校准方法都获得了可比的结果。尽管相关矩阵校准方法产生的参数估计不如L-BFGS-B准确,但在实际临床病例中,这两种新的校准方法提供的临床见解与L-BFGS-B相当。值得注意的是,相关矩阵校准方法比其他两种校准方法快3倍。这些发现突出了我们的新校准方法在临床应用中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
276
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering publishes original papers describing significant, novel developments in numerical methods that are applicable to engineering problems. The Journal is known for welcoming contributions in a wide range of areas in computational engineering, including computational issues in model reduction, uncertainty quantification, verification and validation, inverse analysis and stochastic methods, optimisation, element technology, solution techniques and parallel computing, damage and fracture, mechanics at micro and nano-scales, low-speed fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction, electromagnetics, coupled diffusion phenomena, and error estimation and mesh generation. It is emphasized that this is by no means an exhaustive list, and particularly papers on multi-scale, multi-physics or multi-disciplinary problems, and on new, emerging topics are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Cut Finite Element 3D Acoustic Shape Optimization of a Compression Driver Taking Viscothermal Losses Into Account Surrogate Quantum Circuit Design for the Lattice Boltzmann Collision Operator Numerical Approximation of a PDE-Constrained Optimization Problem that Appears in Data-Driven Computational Mechanics A Multiphysics Topology Optimization Framework for Thermo-Electric Problems With Application to DC Bus Bar Design A New Local Perimeter Control Approach to Minimum Length Scale in Topology Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1