Benchmarking exercise and identification of AI tool to detect false information on food

Guy Coene, Evangelos Konstantinis
{"title":"Benchmarking exercise and identification of AI tool to detect false information on food","authors":"Guy Coene,&nbsp;Evangelos Konstantinis","doi":"10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study has the objectives to conduct desk research to identify available AI-based solutions for detecting false information and to benchmark the identified solutions against a set of features to take into account for an implementation at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The desk research identified 58 potential commercial platform candidates, 39 other but less applicable candidates and 8 related solutions from the intelligence sector. It further reviewed 5 EU tools, 19 EU funded projects, 17 academic projects and 3 other resources. Based on desk research, an initial benchmarking was performed using refined criteria, resulting in the identification of 10 top candidates for deeper analysis. These candidates were assessed through in-depth research, including direct provider interactions. Questionnaires were sent to lower-scoring platforms to further validate the desk research. A final benchmarking analysis, accompanied by a SWOT analysis, was produced for the top candidates. A framework for evaluation, incorporating various levels of actions, actors, tools, and knowledge, was developed and linked to a maturity model to assess the platforms’ suitability at different maturity levels. The study identifies solutions that are suitable for EFSA's current and future needs and could provide insights for other agencies and organizations with similar objectives on misinformation monitoring at scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":100395,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Supporting Publications","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9261","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Supporting Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/sp.efsa.2025.EN-9261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study has the objectives to conduct desk research to identify available AI-based solutions for detecting false information and to benchmark the identified solutions against a set of features to take into account for an implementation at the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The desk research identified 58 potential commercial platform candidates, 39 other but less applicable candidates and 8 related solutions from the intelligence sector. It further reviewed 5 EU tools, 19 EU funded projects, 17 academic projects and 3 other resources. Based on desk research, an initial benchmarking was performed using refined criteria, resulting in the identification of 10 top candidates for deeper analysis. These candidates were assessed through in-depth research, including direct provider interactions. Questionnaires were sent to lower-scoring platforms to further validate the desk research. A final benchmarking analysis, accompanied by a SWOT analysis, was produced for the top candidates. A framework for evaluation, incorporating various levels of actions, actors, tools, and knowledge, was developed and linked to a maturity model to assess the platforms’ suitability at different maturity levels. The study identifies solutions that are suitable for EFSA's current and future needs and could provide insights for other agencies and organizations with similar objectives on misinformation monitoring at scale.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能工具的基准测试和识别,以检测食品上的虚假信息
该研究的目的是进行桌面研究,以确定可用的基于人工智能的解决方案,用于检测虚假信息,并根据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)实施时考虑的一组特征对确定的解决方案进行基准测试。桌面研究确定了58个潜在的商业平台候选人,39个其他但不太适用的候选人和8个来自情报部门的相关解决方案。它进一步审查了5个欧盟工具、19个欧盟资助项目、17个学术项目和3个其他资源。在案头研究的基础上,使用改进的标准进行了初步基准测试,最终确定了10个最佳候选项目,以便进行更深入的分析。这些候选人通过深入的研究进行评估,包括与供应商的直接互动。问卷被发送到得分较低的平台,以进一步验证桌面研究。最后的基准分析,伴随着SWOT分析,产生了最佳候选人。一个评估框架,结合了不同级别的行动、参与者、工具和知识,被开发并链接到一个成熟度模型,以评估平台在不同成熟度级别上的适用性。该研究确定了适合欧洲食品安全局当前和未来需求的解决方案,并可以为其他具有类似目标的机构和组织提供大规模错误信息监测的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FoodEx2 maintenance 2025 Enhancement of the existing Pest Survey Card database and its associated web application Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for cypermethrin in light of confirmatory information Outcome of the consultation with Member States, the applicant and EFSA on the pesticide risk assessment for cypermethrin in light of confirmatory information 2025 Annual Report of the Advisory Group on Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1