The effects of source credibility and content objectivity on pro-environmental post engagement on social media: A case study of Chinese TikTok (Douyin)

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Asian Journal of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1111/ajsp.70002
Zixiao Jiang, Bo Wang, Dawei Cheng, Fangyuan Lou, Ziao Wang
{"title":"The effects of source credibility and content objectivity on pro-environmental post engagement on social media: A case study of Chinese TikTok (Douyin)","authors":"Zixiao Jiang,&nbsp;Bo Wang,&nbsp;Dawei Cheng,&nbsp;Fangyuan Lou,&nbsp;Ziao Wang","doi":"10.1111/ajsp.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Social media has become a primary channel for disseminating environmental information aimed at raising pro-environmental awareness. Post engagement plays a crucial role in effective information dissemination; therefore, environmentalists, government organizations and environmental protection agencies are increasingly focusing on enhancing pro-environmental post engagement on social media. This study applies the heuristic-systematic model to examine the effects of source credibility—a heuristic cue—and content objectivity—a systematic cue—on pro-environmental post engagement. Using 700 short videos from the Chinese TikTok (Douyin) platform, we empirically tested the proposed model. The results show that source credibility positively influences pro-environmental post engagement, whereas content objectivity negatively impacts pro-environmental post engagement, with a more significant effect than source credibility. Furthermore, this study reveals that content objectivity weakens the relationship between source credibility and pro-environmental post engagement. These findings provide empirical support for the attenuation effect in the heuristic-systematic model, demonstrating that when heuristic and systematic cues exert opposing influences on post engagement, systematic processing inhibits heuristic processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47394,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajsp.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media has become a primary channel for disseminating environmental information aimed at raising pro-environmental awareness. Post engagement plays a crucial role in effective information dissemination; therefore, environmentalists, government organizations and environmental protection agencies are increasingly focusing on enhancing pro-environmental post engagement on social media. This study applies the heuristic-systematic model to examine the effects of source credibility—a heuristic cue—and content objectivity—a systematic cue—on pro-environmental post engagement. Using 700 short videos from the Chinese TikTok (Douyin) platform, we empirically tested the proposed model. The results show that source credibility positively influences pro-environmental post engagement, whereas content objectivity negatively impacts pro-environmental post engagement, with a more significant effect than source credibility. Furthermore, this study reveals that content objectivity weakens the relationship between source credibility and pro-environmental post engagement. These findings provide empirical support for the attenuation effect in the heuristic-systematic model, demonstrating that when heuristic and systematic cues exert opposing influences on post engagement, systematic processing inhibits heuristic processing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来源可信度和内容客观性对社交媒体亲环境帖子参与的影响——以中国抖音TikTok为例
社会媒体已成为传播环境信息的主要渠道,旨在提高环保意识。事后接触对有效的信息传播起着至关重要的作用;因此,环保人士、政府组织和环保机构越来越关注在社交媒体上提高亲环境帖子的参与度。本研究采用启发式-系统模型来检验来源可信度(启发式线索)和内容客观性(系统线索)对亲环境岗位参与的影响。使用中国抖音平台上的700个短视频,我们对所提出的模型进行了实证测试。研究结果表明,信息源可信度对亲环境岗位投入有正向影响,而内容客观性对亲环境岗位投入有负向影响,且影响比信息源可信度更显著。此外,本研究还发现,内容客观性削弱了信息源可信度与亲环境岗位参与之间的关系。这些发现为启发式-系统模型的衰减效应提供了实证支持,表明当启发式线索和系统线索对后接触产生相反的影响时,系统加工抑制启发式加工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Social Psychology publishes empirical papers and major reviews on any topic in social psychology and personality, and on topics in other areas of basic and applied psychology that highlight the role of social psychological concepts and theories. The journal coverage also includes all aspects of social processes such as development, cognition, emotions, personality, health and well-being, in the sociocultural context of organisations, schools, communities, social networks, and virtual groups. The journal encourages interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, life sciences, engineering sciences, and the humanities. The journal positively encourages submissions with Asian content and/or Asian authors but welcomes high-quality submissions from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
Social ecology of concealing prosocial behaviours: The role of relational mobility Social ecology of concealing prosocial behaviours: The role of relational mobility The impact of social quality on the subjective well-being of older adults across cohorts in China: A methodological approach combining ordered logistic regression and random forest The impact of social quality on the subjective well-being of older adults across cohorts in China: A methodological approach combining ordered logistic regression and random forest The differential impact of perceived job security on part-time and full-time entrepreneurial intention: A moderated mediation model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1