The Risk of Haematoma and Venous Thrombosis Associated With Thromboprophylaxis Use in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1155/tbj/9898596
Amenah Dhannoon, Ishwarya Balasubramanian, Ali A. Dhannoon, Abeeda Butt, Arnold D. K. Hill
{"title":"The Risk of Haematoma and Venous Thrombosis Associated With Thromboprophylaxis Use in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review","authors":"Amenah Dhannoon,&nbsp;Ishwarya Balasubramanian,&nbsp;Ali A. Dhannoon,&nbsp;Abeeda Butt,&nbsp;Arnold D. K. Hill","doi":"10.1155/tbj/9898596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The routine use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery has caused substantial polarity among breast cancer surgeons across the globe. The aim of this study is to assess the use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery outcomes.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken of all comparative studies that described the role of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery. Studies that reported on postoperative outcomes between patients who received VTE prophylaxis (prophylaxis) and those who did not (no prophylaxis) were included in the review. A meta-analysis using random-effect model was used to analyse key outcomes, with data presented as odd ratio (OR).</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> A total of 2470 patients from 6 studies were included in this study. Among these patients, 60.9% (<i>n</i>: 1504) received prophylaxis. The haematoma rate in this study is 0.05% (<i>n</i>: 133). The incidence of haematoma was significantly associated with the use of prophylaxis (6.85% versus 3.11%, <i>p</i> : 0.001). Surgical intervention for haematomas was also significantly associated in this group (3.15% versus 0.83%, <i>p</i> : 0.004). However, there was no difference in VTE events between both groups (0.26% versus 0.36%, <i>p</i> : 0.88).</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery is associated with increased haematomas without any benefit in preventing VTE events. Future studies that examine the use of risk assessment tools for VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients may be beneficial.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56326,"journal":{"name":"Breast Journal","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbj/9898596","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbj/9898596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The routine use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery has caused substantial polarity among breast cancer surgeons across the globe. The aim of this study is to assess the use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery outcomes.

Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken of all comparative studies that described the role of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery. Studies that reported on postoperative outcomes between patients who received VTE prophylaxis (prophylaxis) and those who did not (no prophylaxis) were included in the review. A meta-analysis using random-effect model was used to analyse key outcomes, with data presented as odd ratio (OR).

Results: A total of 2470 patients from 6 studies were included in this study. Among these patients, 60.9% (n: 1504) received prophylaxis. The haematoma rate in this study is 0.05% (n: 133). The incidence of haematoma was significantly associated with the use of prophylaxis (6.85% versus 3.11%, p : 0.001). Surgical intervention for haematomas was also significantly associated in this group (3.15% versus 0.83%, p : 0.004). However, there was no difference in VTE events between both groups (0.26% versus 0.36%, p : 0.88).

Conclusions: The use of VTE prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery is associated with increased haematomas without any benefit in preventing VTE events. Future studies that examine the use of risk assessment tools for VTE prophylaxis in high risk patients may be beneficial.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Journal
Breast Journal 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Breast Journal is the first comprehensive, multidisciplinary source devoted exclusively to all facets of research, diagnosis, and treatment of breast disease. The Breast Journal encompasses the latest news and technologies from the many medical specialties concerned with breast disease care in order to address the disease within the context of an integrated breast health care. This editorial philosophy recognizes the special social, sexual, and psychological considerations that distinguish cancer, and breast cancer in particular, from other serious diseases. Topics specifically within the scope of The Breast Journal include: Risk Factors Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis and Therapy Psychological Issues Quality of Life Biology of Breast Cancer.
期刊最新文献
The Risk of Haematoma and Venous Thrombosis Associated With Thromboprophylaxis Use in Breast Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review The Relationship Between Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of 22 Cases of Tubular Breast Carcinoma Switching to Tumescent Dissection in Mastectomy Management of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Effectiveness of a Steroid-Free Regimen Using Tinospora cordifolia—A Single-Institution Experience Intralesional Steroid Injections for Management of Granulomatous Mastitis: A Systematic Review of Treatment Protocols and Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1