Second Time Around: Increased Rate of Living Donation From Repeat Organ Donors

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-01-06 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70049
Carolyn N. Sidoti, Kelly Terlizzi, Conor Donnelly, Ian S. Jaffe, Jennifer D. Motter, Benjamin Philosophe, Reed T. Jenkins, Sarah Hussain, Pedro Colon, Amit D. Tevar, Bonnie E. Lonze, Babak J. Orandi, Macey L. Levan, Dorry L. Segev, Allan B. Massie
{"title":"Second Time Around: Increased Rate of Living Donation From Repeat Organ Donors","authors":"Carolyn N. Sidoti,&nbsp;Kelly Terlizzi,&nbsp;Conor Donnelly,&nbsp;Ian S. Jaffe,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Motter,&nbsp;Benjamin Philosophe,&nbsp;Reed T. Jenkins,&nbsp;Sarah Hussain,&nbsp;Pedro Colon,&nbsp;Amit D. Tevar,&nbsp;Bonnie E. Lonze,&nbsp;Babak J. Orandi,&nbsp;Macey L. Levan,&nbsp;Dorry L. Segev,&nbsp;Allan B. Massie","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Some living organ donors will decide to donate again at a later date. Evidence has indicated that this practice may have increased in recent years. We evaluated the incidence and outcomes of this practice to inform counseling of potential repeat donors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using SRTR data from 1994 to 2023, we identified 220 repeat living donors and their 415 recipients. We constructed donor comparison groups using weighting by the odds. We described clinical and lab results at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-donation separately for kidney-second donors and liver-second donors. We compared all-cause graft failure for their recipients with those of comparison donors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The annual count of repeat living donors increased from 5 in 2018 to 25 in 2019 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Of 220 donors, 159 were liver-second donors (72.3%) and 55 were kidney-second donors (25.0). The percentage of nondirected donations increased from 30.5% at first donation to 53.2% at second donation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Liver-second donors had one death approximately 2.5 years post-donation. Seventeen were re-admitted and 20 experienced complications requiring an interventional procedure or re-operation. Among kidney-second donors, no deaths, re-admissions, or post-donation complications were reported. Post-donation outcomes in both groups were comparable when evaluated against organ-specific comparison donors. Recipients of repeat living donors experienced graft survival similar to recipients of comparison donors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Repeat living donation may be a safe practice for carefully selected living donors in the short term; however, long term safety is unknown. Outcomes for recipients are similar to recipients of comparison donors.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Some living organ donors will decide to donate again at a later date. Evidence has indicated that this practice may have increased in recent years. We evaluated the incidence and outcomes of this practice to inform counseling of potential repeat donors.

Methods

Using SRTR data from 1994 to 2023, we identified 220 repeat living donors and their 415 recipients. We constructed donor comparison groups using weighting by the odds. We described clinical and lab results at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-donation separately for kidney-second donors and liver-second donors. We compared all-cause graft failure for their recipients with those of comparison donors.

Results

The annual count of repeat living donors increased from 5 in 2018 to 25 in 2019 (p < 0.001). Of 220 donors, 159 were liver-second donors (72.3%) and 55 were kidney-second donors (25.0). The percentage of nondirected donations increased from 30.5% at first donation to 53.2% at second donation (p < 0.001). Liver-second donors had one death approximately 2.5 years post-donation. Seventeen were re-admitted and 20 experienced complications requiring an interventional procedure or re-operation. Among kidney-second donors, no deaths, re-admissions, or post-donation complications were reported. Post-donation outcomes in both groups were comparable when evaluated against organ-specific comparison donors. Recipients of repeat living donors experienced graft survival similar to recipients of comparison donors.

Conclusions

Repeat living donation may be a safe practice for carefully selected living donors in the short term; however, long term safety is unknown. Outcomes for recipients are similar to recipients of comparison donors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二次:增加了重复器官捐献者的活体捐赠率
一些活体器官捐献者会决定在以后再次捐献。有证据表明,这种做法近年来可能有所增加。我们评估了这种做法的发生率和结果,以告知潜在重复供体的咨询。方法利用1994年至2023年的SRTR数据,确定220例重复活体供体及其415例受者。我们使用概率加权法构建了供体比较组。我们分别描述了肾脏第二供者和肝脏第二供者在捐赠后6个月、1年和2年的临床和实验室结果。我们比较了受者与对照供者的全因移植失败。结果重复活体献血者从2018年的5例增加到2019年的25例(p <;0.001)。220例献血者中,159例为第二肝献血者(72.3%),55例为第二肾献血者(25.0%)。非定向捐赠的比例从第一次捐赠时的30.5%增加到第二次捐赠时的53.2% (p <;0.001)。第二次肝脏供者在捐赠后约2.5年死亡1例。17例再次入院,20例出现并发症,需要介入手术或再次手术。在肾二次供者中,没有死亡、再入院或捐赠后并发症的报道。当与器官特异性比较供者进行评估时,两组的捐赠后结果具有可比性。重复活体供者的受者与比较供者的受者的移植物存活率相似。结论对于精心挑选的活体供者,短期内重复活体捐献可能是一种安全的做法;然而,长期安全性尚不清楚。接受者的结果与比较捐赠者的接受者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Transmuscular Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Evaluating the Impact of Organ Allocation Policies on Black Patients: A Single-Center Analysis Subclinical and Borderline Rejection are Associated With Death-Censored Graft Loss After Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Bridging Oceans and Distance: Excellent Long-Term Outcomes in Non-Mainland Kidney Transplantation Initial Experience With Single-Port Robotic Donor Nephrectomy Using the da Vinci SP System: A Case Series Evaluating Safety, Feasibility, and Early Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1