“I still think that standard English is important”: Secondary ELA teachers' complex beliefs about foundational language for writing

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1002/jaal.1395
Christina L. Dobbs, Christine Montecillo Leider
{"title":"“I still think that standard English is important”: Secondary ELA teachers' complex beliefs about foundational language for writing","authors":"Christina L. Dobbs,&nbsp;Christine Montecillo Leider","doi":"10.1002/jaal.1395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foundational skills are often viewed as necessary components for automaticity in reading and writing. In this study, we draw on teacher interviews to explore what secondary English/language arts teachers identify as necessary language for successful school writing. Findings suggest that teachers believe White mainstream English is a necessary component for academic success, although interviewees could not recall ever being explicitly taught this idea. Furthermore, teachers experience a tension between wanting to engage in culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy and their (often unexamined) underlying beliefs about White mainstream English being part of foundational language. We discuss how teachers' understanding of language skills includes their beliefs about what is deemed “correct” and “appropriate” for school and discuss the hidden ways foundational skills reinforce White mainstream English-centric ways of knowing. We offer recommendations for teachers to examine their own biases in foundational language for writing.</p>","PeriodicalId":47621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","volume":"68 4","pages":"353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaal.1395","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foundational skills are often viewed as necessary components for automaticity in reading and writing. In this study, we draw on teacher interviews to explore what secondary English/language arts teachers identify as necessary language for successful school writing. Findings suggest that teachers believe White mainstream English is a necessary component for academic success, although interviewees could not recall ever being explicitly taught this idea. Furthermore, teachers experience a tension between wanting to engage in culturally and linguistically responsive pedagogy and their (often unexamined) underlying beliefs about White mainstream English being part of foundational language. We discuss how teachers' understanding of language skills includes their beliefs about what is deemed “correct” and “appropriate” for school and discuss the hidden ways foundational skills reinforce White mainstream English-centric ways of knowing. We offer recommendations for teachers to examine their own biases in foundational language for writing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我仍然认为标准英语很重要”:中学ELA教师对写作基础语言的复杂信念
基础技能通常被视为自动阅读和写作的必要组成部分。在这项研究中,我们利用教师访谈来探讨中学英语/语言艺术教师认为成功的学校写作所必需的语言。调查结果表明,教师认为白人主流英语是学业成功的必要组成部分,尽管受访者不记得曾经被明确地教导过这种观点。此外,教师在想要参与文化和语言反应教学法与他们(通常未经检验)关于白人主流英语是基础语言一部分的潜在信念之间感到紧张。我们讨论了教师对语言技能的理解如何包括他们对学校的“正确”和“适当”的信念,并讨论了基本技能强化白人主流英语为中心的学习方式的隐藏方式。我们为教师提供建议,以检查他们在基础写作语言方面的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy is the only literacy journal published exclusively for teachers of older learners. Each issue offers practical, classroom-tested ideas grounded in research and theory. Whether you work with new, struggling, or skilled readers, you’ll find something of interest in JAAL. Every issue includes •Practical ideas for instruction •Reviews of student and teacher resources, including young adult literature •Tips on how to integrate technology, media, and popular culture in your classroom •Reflections on current literacy trends, issues, and research
期刊最新文献
Reimagining Inclusivity in Literacy Education for African Immigrant Adolescents Issue Information Research as Praxis: An Invitation for JAAL Submissions From Practitioners A Teen's Journey With ChatGPT: Agency, Identity, and Ethics in in- and out-of-school literacy activities A Critical Heuristic for Analyzing Works of Young Adult Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1