Empowering Engineering Students Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended Human–AI Creative Ideation Processes With ChatGPT

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computer Applications in Engineering Education Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1002/cae.22817
Rosó Baltà-Salvador, Ismail El-Madafri, Enric Brasó-Vives, Marta Peña
{"title":"Empowering Engineering Students Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Blended Human–AI Creative Ideation Processes With ChatGPT","authors":"Rosó Baltà-Salvador,&nbsp;Ismail El-Madafri,&nbsp;Enric Brasó-Vives,&nbsp;Marta Peña","doi":"10.1002/cae.22817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has the potential to revolutionize how students engage in academic activities and tasks. This research empirically analyses the influence of AI on creative ideation within educational settings to validate AI's role in enhancing human creativity since creative tasks, which inherently rely on human intuition, emotion and divergent thinking, may be stifled by systematic AI tools. The study explores whether ChatGPT can aid the creative process or inadvertently limit human creativity with a mixed-method approach consisting of a randomized controlled experiment with third-year engineering students in which a total of 728 ideas were obtained, along with a structured survey. The results revealed a predominantly positive perception towards AI-assisted ideation; nevertheless, concerns were raised about AI's influence on creativity and innovation. While no significant differences in ideation outcomes were observed between the groups that used AI and those that did not, significant differences emerged between students who had prior experience with ChatGPT and those who did not. Qualitative insights provided a nuanced view of student experiences on blended human–AI ideation processes, shedding light on its advantages and disadvantages in educational practices. This research also underscores critical considerations and potential risks associated with the adoption of AI, suggesting that while AI has a place in educational settings, its role should be carefully calibrated to support rather than stifle student creativity and innovation. From the findings, the study provides practical recommendations and best practices regarding the integration of AI tools in education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cae.22817","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education has the potential to revolutionize how students engage in academic activities and tasks. This research empirically analyses the influence of AI on creative ideation within educational settings to validate AI's role in enhancing human creativity since creative tasks, which inherently rely on human intuition, emotion and divergent thinking, may be stifled by systematic AI tools. The study explores whether ChatGPT can aid the creative process or inadvertently limit human creativity with a mixed-method approach consisting of a randomized controlled experiment with third-year engineering students in which a total of 728 ideas were obtained, along with a structured survey. The results revealed a predominantly positive perception towards AI-assisted ideation; nevertheless, concerns were raised about AI's influence on creativity and innovation. While no significant differences in ideation outcomes were observed between the groups that used AI and those that did not, significant differences emerged between students who had prior experience with ChatGPT and those who did not. Qualitative insights provided a nuanced view of student experiences on blended human–AI ideation processes, shedding light on its advantages and disadvantages in educational practices. This research also underscores critical considerations and potential risks associated with the adoption of AI, suggesting that while AI has a place in educational settings, its role should be carefully calibrated to support rather than stifle student creativity and innovation. From the findings, the study provides practical recommendations and best practices regarding the integration of AI tools in education.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Classroom: Understanding the Evolution of Educational Data Mining With Key Route Main Path Analysis Pedagogical Approach for Quantum Computing in Engineering Education Design of a Microprocessors and Microcontrollers Laboratory Course Addressing Complex Engineering Problems and Activities The Promise and Pitfalls: A Literature Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Assistant in ICT Education Using Adaptive Learning Platform Data in a Flipped Classroom for Early Detection and Tutoring of Low-Performing Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1