Contribution of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to the Acquisition of Modal Verbs: The Moderating Role of Field (In)dependence and Working Memory

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1111/ejed.12887
Sedigheh Karimpour, Hossein Kargar Behbahani
{"title":"Contribution of Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to the Acquisition of Modal Verbs: The Moderating Role of Field (In)dependence and Working Memory","authors":"Sedigheh Karimpour,&nbsp;Hossein Kargar Behbahani","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As an alternative to conventional instruction and evaluation methods, dynamic assessment aims to promote language learning by utilising an interactive approach. As a subset of dynamic assessment, the interventionist approach to dynamic assessment focuses on mediation from implicit to explicit. In spite of its central role in language learning and assessment, the interventionist dynamic assessment has received less attention in empirical research. To fill part of the gap, this study examined the contributions of interventionist dynamic assessment to the acquisition of modal verbs treating working memory and field (in)dependence as two moderating variables. Two intact classes of experimental and control groups, each with 30 subjects, took part in this quantitative quasi-experimental research. The experimental group received an interventionist dynamic assessment based on the target linguistic feature, while the control group received a traditional presentation-practice-production mode of instruction. The findings of the study revealed that while at the onset, both groups performed similarly, the experimental group outperformed the control group on the posttest, as determined by the between-subjects ANOVA. The difference between pretest and delayed posttest scores was also significant, corroborating the effectiveness of the treatment on the acquisition of the linguistic form. The study findings highlighted how interventionist dynamic assessment along with a high working memory and a field-independence trait influence the acquisition of linguistic features. The study has multiple implications for EFL learners and teachers.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an alternative to conventional instruction and evaluation methods, dynamic assessment aims to promote language learning by utilising an interactive approach. As a subset of dynamic assessment, the interventionist approach to dynamic assessment focuses on mediation from implicit to explicit. In spite of its central role in language learning and assessment, the interventionist dynamic assessment has received less attention in empirical research. To fill part of the gap, this study examined the contributions of interventionist dynamic assessment to the acquisition of modal verbs treating working memory and field (in)dependence as two moderating variables. Two intact classes of experimental and control groups, each with 30 subjects, took part in this quantitative quasi-experimental research. The experimental group received an interventionist dynamic assessment based on the target linguistic feature, while the control group received a traditional presentation-practice-production mode of instruction. The findings of the study revealed that while at the onset, both groups performed similarly, the experimental group outperformed the control group on the posttest, as determined by the between-subjects ANOVA. The difference between pretest and delayed posttest scores was also significant, corroborating the effectiveness of the treatment on the acquisition of the linguistic form. The study findings highlighted how interventionist dynamic assessment along with a high working memory and a field-independence trait influence the acquisition of linguistic features. The study has multiple implications for EFL learners and teachers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities in Literacy and Numeracy Skills Among Romanian Adults: Evidence From e-PASS 2023 An Unintended Consequence? The Impact of Higher Education Expansion on the Retake Rate of the College Entrance Examination The Impact of Social Entrepreneurship Education on Students' Social Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Social Entrepreneurial Competence Deepening Awareness of Circular Economy Concepts in the Textile Sector Among University Students Industrial Strikes in Higher Education: Ascertaining Causes and the Levels of Effect From Developing Economy Perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1