Compost Application Enhances Soil Health and Maintains Crop Yield: Insights From 56 Farmer-Managed Arable Fields

Anna Edlinger, Chantal Herzog, Gina Garland, Florian Walder, Samiran Banerjee, Sonja G. Keel, Jochen Mayer, Laurent Philippot, Sana Romdhane, Marcus Schiedung, Michael W. I. Schmidt, Benjamin Seitz, Chloé Wüst-Galley, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden
{"title":"Compost Application Enhances Soil Health and Maintains Crop Yield: Insights From 56 Farmer-Managed Arable Fields","authors":"Anna Edlinger,&nbsp;Chantal Herzog,&nbsp;Gina Garland,&nbsp;Florian Walder,&nbsp;Samiran Banerjee,&nbsp;Sonja G. Keel,&nbsp;Jochen Mayer,&nbsp;Laurent Philippot,&nbsp;Sana Romdhane,&nbsp;Marcus Schiedung,&nbsp;Michael W. I. Schmidt,&nbsp;Benjamin Seitz,&nbsp;Chloé Wüst-Galley,&nbsp;Marcel G. A. van der Heijden","doi":"10.1002/sae2.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Improving soil health while maintaining crop yield is a key challenge for farmers. So far, only a few studies assessed the effects of compost and solid digestate application on soil health and plant yield under practical on-farm conditions across both organic and conventional cropping systems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study examined 56 arable fields in Switzerland, managed either conventionally (<i>n</i> = 39) or organically (<i>n</i> = 17) by individual farmers. Fields were categorised based on their fertilisation history: standard fertilisation (<i>n</i> = 21), including livestock manure, slurry, and mineral fertilisers (reference), or with additional compost (<i>n</i> = 26) or solid digestate (<i>n</i> = 9) amendments. Soil health was assessed based on eight chemical, biological, and physical soil health indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Compost use, but not solid digestate use, was associated with enhanced average soil health ( + 31% over reference fields), driven by increases in basal respiration ( + 45%), cation exchange capacity ( + 42%), fungal richness ( + 18%), and marginally higher soil organic carbon stocks ( + 28%). These differences were consistent across management systems, despite site variability. Clay content and extended periods of crop cover also positively influenced soil health. Wheat yields were 21% lower under organic management but unaffected by compost or digestate use.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that using compost alongside practices like extended periods of crop cover can effectively promote soil health while maintaining yields in practical farming scenarios, offering a means to balance multiple sustainability goals simultaneously.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.70041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Improving soil health while maintaining crop yield is a key challenge for farmers. So far, only a few studies assessed the effects of compost and solid digestate application on soil health and plant yield under practical on-farm conditions across both organic and conventional cropping systems.

Materials and Methods

This study examined 56 arable fields in Switzerland, managed either conventionally (n = 39) or organically (n = 17) by individual farmers. Fields were categorised based on their fertilisation history: standard fertilisation (n = 21), including livestock manure, slurry, and mineral fertilisers (reference), or with additional compost (n = 26) or solid digestate (n = 9) amendments. Soil health was assessed based on eight chemical, biological, and physical soil health indicators.

Results

Compost use, but not solid digestate use, was associated with enhanced average soil health ( + 31% over reference fields), driven by increases in basal respiration ( + 45%), cation exchange capacity ( + 42%), fungal richness ( + 18%), and marginally higher soil organic carbon stocks ( + 28%). These differences were consistent across management systems, despite site variability. Clay content and extended periods of crop cover also positively influenced soil health. Wheat yields were 21% lower under organic management but unaffected by compost or digestate use.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that using compost alongside practices like extended periods of crop cover can effectively promote soil health while maintaining yields in practical farming scenarios, offering a means to balance multiple sustainability goals simultaneously.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Soil Multitrophic Interactions in a Changing World Root and Leaf Traits of Alfalfa Exhibit Distinct Responses to Soil Microbial Communities and Environmental Stresses Improved Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency With Low Tillage Intensity: Evidence and Research Gaps Mechanisms of Microbial VOC-Mediated Communication in Plant Ecosystems and Agricultural Applications Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Can Improve the Water Use and Phosphorus Acquisition Efficiencies of Aerobically Grown Rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1