Friction and Fragility in Encountering Cultural Difference: Why Global South Fulbright Students Withdraw From Cosmopolitanism in the United States

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs Pub Date : 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1111/glob.12520
Shunan You
{"title":"Friction and Fragility in Encountering Cultural Difference: Why Global South Fulbright Students Withdraw From Cosmopolitanism in the United States","authors":"Shunan You","doi":"10.1111/glob.12520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars have extensively written about how convivial cross-cultural encounters, driven by global mobility, underpin mutual understanding and cosmopolitan aspirations. However, little attention has been paid to encounters that cause friction or require considerable effort to bridge differences. This paper centres on conflictual and negative experiences of encountering cultural diversity through the lens of Global South Fulbright students in the Boston area of the United States. As one of the most prestigious educational and cultural exchange programmes in the United States, the Fulbright Program advocates for cultural diplomacy, and its participants are regarded as cultural ambassadors to enhance cross-cultural understandings. By examining the unfavourable experiences of these cosmopolitan-oriented students, I develop a framework to analyse how the friction and fragility of cosmopolitanism are produced through interpersonal, structural and circumstantial causes, leading to their withdrawal from cosmopolitanism. This framework helps analyse challenges to cosmopolitanism in a post-pandemic world marked by growing xenophobia and provincialism.</p>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glob.12520","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars have extensively written about how convivial cross-cultural encounters, driven by global mobility, underpin mutual understanding and cosmopolitan aspirations. However, little attention has been paid to encounters that cause friction or require considerable effort to bridge differences. This paper centres on conflictual and negative experiences of encountering cultural diversity through the lens of Global South Fulbright students in the Boston area of the United States. As one of the most prestigious educational and cultural exchange programmes in the United States, the Fulbright Program advocates for cultural diplomacy, and its participants are regarded as cultural ambassadors to enhance cross-cultural understandings. By examining the unfavourable experiences of these cosmopolitan-oriented students, I develop a framework to analyse how the friction and fragility of cosmopolitanism are produced through interpersonal, structural and circumstantial causes, leading to their withdrawal from cosmopolitanism. This framework helps analyse challenges to cosmopolitanism in a post-pandemic world marked by growing xenophobia and provincialism.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学者们撰文广泛论述了在全球流动性的推动下,和谐的跨文化接触如何巩固了相互理解和世界主义愿望。然而,人们很少关注那些会引起摩擦或需要付出巨大努力才能弥合分歧的相遇。本文通过美国波士顿地区的全球南方富布赖特学生的视角,集中探讨了遭遇文化多样性时的冲突和负面经历。作为美国最负盛名的教育和文化交流项目之一,富布赖特项目倡导文化外交,其参与者被视为增进跨文化理解的文化大使。通过研究这些以世界主义为导向的学生的不利经历,我建立了一个框架,分析世界主义的摩擦和脆弱性是如何通过人际、结构和环境原因产生的,从而导致他们退出世界主义。这一框架有助于分析在仇外心理和地方主义愈演愈烈的后大流行世界中,世界主义所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Glocal Capitalist Class: How Same-Nation Interlocks Facilitate Transnational Corporate Political Unity in Global Environmental Politics Friction and Fragility in Encountering Cultural Difference: Why Global South Fulbright Students Withdraw From Cosmopolitanism in the United States The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Transnational Aging Experience of Older Hong Kongers The Welfare System in the Face of War Refugees From Ukraine: The Experience of Social Workers in Poland Changed Reality, Changed Positions: The Case Study of Eritrean Women Refugees in Times of Global Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1