NeuroSight: A Deep-Learning Integrated Efficient Approach to Brain Tumor Detection

IF 2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Engineering reports : open access Pub Date : 2025-01-14 DOI:10.1002/eng2.13100
Shafayat Bin Shabbir Mugdha, Mahtab Uddin
{"title":"NeuroSight: A Deep-Learning Integrated Efficient Approach to Brain Tumor Detection","authors":"Shafayat Bin Shabbir Mugdha,&nbsp;Mahtab Uddin","doi":"10.1002/eng2.13100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Brain tumors pose a significant health risk and require immediate attention. Despite progress, accurately classifying these tumors remains challenging due to their location, shape, and size variability. This has led to exploring deep learning and machine learning in biomedical imaging, particularly in processing and analyzing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. This study compared a newly developed Convolutional Neural Network model to pre-trained models using transfer learning, focusing on a comprehensive comparison involving VGG-16, ResNet-50, AlexNet, and Inception-v3. VGG-16 model outperformed all other models with 95.52% test accuracy, 99.87% training accuracy, and 0.2348 validation loss. ResNet-50 model got 93.31% test accuracy, 98.78% training accuracy, and 0.6327 validation loss. The CNN model has a 0.2960 validation loss, 92.59% test accuracy, and 98.11% training accuracy. The worst model seemed to be Inception-v3, with 89.40% test accuracy, 97.89% training accuracy, and 0.4418 validation loss. This approach facilitates deep-learning researchers in identifying and categorizing brain cancers by comparing recent papers and assessing deep-learning methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.13100","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.13100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain tumors pose a significant health risk and require immediate attention. Despite progress, accurately classifying these tumors remains challenging due to their location, shape, and size variability. This has led to exploring deep learning and machine learning in biomedical imaging, particularly in processing and analyzing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. This study compared a newly developed Convolutional Neural Network model to pre-trained models using transfer learning, focusing on a comprehensive comparison involving VGG-16, ResNet-50, AlexNet, and Inception-v3. VGG-16 model outperformed all other models with 95.52% test accuracy, 99.87% training accuracy, and 0.2348 validation loss. ResNet-50 model got 93.31% test accuracy, 98.78% training accuracy, and 0.6327 validation loss. The CNN model has a 0.2960 validation loss, 92.59% test accuracy, and 98.11% training accuracy. The worst model seemed to be Inception-v3, with 89.40% test accuracy, 97.89% training accuracy, and 0.4418 validation loss. This approach facilitates deep-learning researchers in identifying and categorizing brain cancers by comparing recent papers and assessing deep-learning methodologies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经视觉:一种深度学习集成的高效脑肿瘤检测方法
脑肿瘤对健康构成重大威胁,需要立即予以关注。尽管取得了进展,但由于其位置、形状和大小的可变性,对这些肿瘤进行准确分类仍然具有挑战性。这导致了深度学习和机器学习在生物医学成像中的探索,特别是在处理和分析磁共振成像(MRI)数据方面。本研究将新开发的卷积神经网络模型与使用迁移学习的预训练模型进行了比较,重点对VGG-16、ResNet-50、AlexNet和Inception-v3进行了全面比较。VGG-16模型的测试准确率为95.52%,训练准确率为99.87%,验证损失为0.2348。ResNet-50模型的测试准确率为93.31%,训练准确率为98.78%,验证损失为0.6327。CNN模型的验证损失为0.2960,测试准确率为92.59%,训练准确率为98.11%。最差的模型似乎是Inception-v3,测试准确率为89.40%,训练准确率为97.89%,验证损失为0.4418。这种方法有助于深度学习研究人员通过比较最近的论文和评估深度学习方法来识别和分类脑癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Advanced Statistical Characterization and Correlation Analysis of Process Performance Indicators for Optimized Engineering Decisions RogueGPT: Unleashing Jailbreak Prompts on LLMs A Review on Explainable, Federated Multimodal AI for Heart Disease Detection Using ECG, Cardiac Imaging, and Electronic Health Records Numerical and Intelligent Modeling of MHD Casson Nanofluid Heat Transfer in Fractal Porous Cavities for Energy Systems A Smartphone and Web-Based Automated Platform for Segmenting Urinary Tract Infection Using a Deep Learning-Based Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1