Charity Checkouts: (Potential) Downsides for Customers, Nonprofits and Businesses Involved

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1002/nvsm.70002
Tine Faseur, Tine De Bock
{"title":"Charity Checkouts: (Potential) Downsides for Customers, Nonprofits and Businesses Involved","authors":"Tine Faseur,&nbsp;Tine De Bock","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Nonprofits are constantly prompted to seek alternative income sources. Charity checkouts (CCs) are a recent fundraising technique blending corporate and individual donor support. They involve a unique triadic structure between businesses, customers and nonprofits. More specifically, CCs describe an online or offline shopping situation in which companies solicit customers to donate a small amount of money while checking out. Despite their success, CCs face critical voices and concerns. This study systematically reviews academic and grey literature, with the goal to delineate (potential) downsides comprehensively. This research aids nonprofits and businesses engaged in CC triads in making informed decisions for a sustainable growth of their fundraising and CSR strategy. Beyond its practical implications, this study contributes to the limited academic literature on CCs. The reflections in the discussion, along with the extensive agenda for future research, represent a significant step forward towards advancing the field.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonprofits are constantly prompted to seek alternative income sources. Charity checkouts (CCs) are a recent fundraising technique blending corporate and individual donor support. They involve a unique triadic structure between businesses, customers and nonprofits. More specifically, CCs describe an online or offline shopping situation in which companies solicit customers to donate a small amount of money while checking out. Despite their success, CCs face critical voices and concerns. This study systematically reviews academic and grey literature, with the goal to delineate (potential) downsides comprehensively. This research aids nonprofits and businesses engaged in CC triads in making informed decisions for a sustainable growth of their fundraising and CSR strategy. Beyond its practical implications, this study contributes to the limited academic literature on CCs. The reflections in the discussion, along with the extensive agenda for future research, represent a significant step forward towards advancing the field.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慈善结帐:(潜在)对客户、非营利组织和相关企业的不利影响
非营利组织不断被要求寻找其他收入来源。慈善结帐(CCs)是一种结合了公司和个人捐赠支持的最新筹款技术。它们涉及企业、客户和非营利组织之间独特的三合一结构。更具体地说,cc指的是一种线上或线下购物的情况,在这种情况下,公司会要求顾客在结账时捐出一小笔钱。尽管CCs取得了成功,但仍面临批评的声音和担忧。本研究系统地回顾了学术文献和灰色文献,目的是全面描述(潜在的)缺点。这项研究有助于参与公益三合会的非营利组织和企业为其筹款和企业社会责任战略的可持续增长做出明智的决定。除了实际意义之外,本研究还对有限的CCs学术文献做出了贡献。讨论中的反思,以及对未来研究的广泛议程,代表着朝着推进该领域迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned: Individual Charitable Giving and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 Issue Information Digital Users Perceptions of Philanthropic Donations Across Social Media and Institutional Websites Issue Information Beyond Beneficiaries: Expanding Questions of Autonomy in Crowdfunding, Through a Situated Lens on Health Citizenship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1