Exploring the Dark Side of the NGO Halo: Relating NGO Mission, Morals, and People to NGO Unethical Behavior

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1002/nvsm.70000
Isabel De Bruin Cardoso, Marco Meyer, Muel Kaptein
{"title":"Exploring the Dark Side of the NGO Halo: Relating NGO Mission, Morals, and People to NGO Unethical Behavior","authors":"Isabel De Bruin Cardoso,&nbsp;Marco Meyer,&nbsp;Muel Kaptein","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores why nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) engage in unethical behavior <i>because of,</i> and not despite, their perceived moral integrity. Contrary to expectations, we show how a glorified perception of moral integrity within NGOs can create blind spots for unethical behavior, a phenomenon termed the NGO halo effect. The NGO halo consists of people in NGOs glorifying the moral goodness of their organization's mission, morals, and people and prioritizing them over other considerations, the effect of which is unethical behavior. The relationship between the NGO halo and NGO unethical behavior has not been measured. We conduct two studies to measure the relationship between the NGO halo and NGO unethical behavior. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 256), we define and establish the content validity of the two NGO halo effect constructs. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 544), we validate the constructs and use a regression design to show that the NGO halo is positively and significantly related to unethical behavior. Our research reveals the dark side of moral idealization and confirms that the NGO halo effect is a risk factor for NGO unethical behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nvsm.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores why nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) engage in unethical behavior because of, and not despite, their perceived moral integrity. Contrary to expectations, we show how a glorified perception of moral integrity within NGOs can create blind spots for unethical behavior, a phenomenon termed the NGO halo effect. The NGO halo consists of people in NGOs glorifying the moral goodness of their organization's mission, morals, and people and prioritizing them over other considerations, the effect of which is unethical behavior. The relationship between the NGO halo and NGO unethical behavior has not been measured. We conduct two studies to measure the relationship between the NGO halo and NGO unethical behavior. In Study 1 (N = 256), we define and establish the content validity of the two NGO halo effect constructs. In Study 2 (N = 544), we validate the constructs and use a regression design to show that the NGO halo is positively and significantly related to unethical behavior. Our research reveals the dark side of moral idealization and confirms that the NGO halo effect is a risk factor for NGO unethical behavior.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索NGO光环的黑暗面:NGO使命、道德、人与NGO不道德行为的关系
本研究探讨了为什么非政府组织(ngo)从事不道德的行为,因为,而不是尽管,他们的道德诚信。与预期相反,我们展示了非政府组织内部对道德诚信的美化如何为不道德行为创造盲点,这种现象被称为非政府组织光环效应。“NGO光环”是指NGO内部的人将组织的使命、道德、人的道德美德美化,凌驾于其他考量之上,其结果是不道德的行为。非政府组织光环与非政府组织不道德行为之间的关系尚未被测量。我们进行了两项研究来衡量非政府组织光环与非政府组织不道德行为之间的关系。在研究1 (N = 256)中,我们定义并建立了两个非政府组织光环效应构念的内容效度。在研究2 (N = 544)中,我们验证了这些结构,并使用回归设计来证明非政府组织光环与不道德行为呈正相关。我们的研究揭示了道德理想化的阴暗面,证实了非政府组织的光环效应是非政府组织不道德行为的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lessons Learned: Individual Charitable Giving and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 Issue Information Digital Users Perceptions of Philanthropic Donations Across Social Media and Institutional Websites Issue Information Beyond Beneficiaries: Expanding Questions of Autonomy in Crowdfunding, Through a Situated Lens on Health Citizenship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1