Insights from large-scale shake table testing: Key criticisms and potential solutions

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/eqe.4271
Kazuhiro Hayashi, Masayoshi Nakashima
{"title":"Insights from large-scale shake table testing: Key criticisms and potential solutions","authors":"Kazuhiro Hayashi,&nbsp;Masayoshi Nakashima","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article presents the authors' experience with large-scale shaking table tests conducted in Japan using the E-Defense shaking table. The discussion focuses on four criticisms often addressed regarding the utilities of large-scale shaking table tests. Potential solutions to mitigate such criticisms are discussed based on shaking table tests conducted for a pair of three-story wooden houses. The first criticism is that the test specimen anchored rigidly to a rigid shaking table is not a reproduction of actual structures supported by soils and foundations. A model ground was developed in a large sandbox, which occupied about 85% of the total specimen weight, supported the house, and the entire soil-structure system was shaken. Considerable sliding occurred, having lessened the earthquake forces exerted and resultant damage to the superstructure. The second criticism is that a single specimen test, regardless of its size, cannot provide sufficient information for generalizing the behavior and performance. Empirical equations between the maximum story drift and the change in the natural frequency were developed from a series of shaking table tests. Using such empirical equations might promote quick damage assessment of individual houses when suffering from actual earthquakes. The third criticism is the importance of public appeal and eventual support from the general public to secure the budget to operate large-scale testing facilities. The example test featured two nearly identical specimens placed on the table with different support conditions. The apparent difference in response revealed the effect of support conditions on seismic performance. The fourth criticism is the importance of increasing the number of experimental projects to balance the operation budget. Most of the preparation in the example test was accomplished in an open yard adjacent to the shaking table, and the test specimens were quickly assembled on the table using indoor cranes. The table occupation was four out of 35 weeks of the entire test duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 2","pages":"604-617"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the authors' experience with large-scale shaking table tests conducted in Japan using the E-Defense shaking table. The discussion focuses on four criticisms often addressed regarding the utilities of large-scale shaking table tests. Potential solutions to mitigate such criticisms are discussed based on shaking table tests conducted for a pair of three-story wooden houses. The first criticism is that the test specimen anchored rigidly to a rigid shaking table is not a reproduction of actual structures supported by soils and foundations. A model ground was developed in a large sandbox, which occupied about 85% of the total specimen weight, supported the house, and the entire soil-structure system was shaken. Considerable sliding occurred, having lessened the earthquake forces exerted and resultant damage to the superstructure. The second criticism is that a single specimen test, regardless of its size, cannot provide sufficient information for generalizing the behavior and performance. Empirical equations between the maximum story drift and the change in the natural frequency were developed from a series of shaking table tests. Using such empirical equations might promote quick damage assessment of individual houses when suffering from actual earthquakes. The third criticism is the importance of public appeal and eventual support from the general public to secure the budget to operate large-scale testing facilities. The example test featured two nearly identical specimens placed on the table with different support conditions. The apparent difference in response revealed the effect of support conditions on seismic performance. The fourth criticism is the importance of increasing the number of experimental projects to balance the operation budget. Most of the preparation in the example test was accomplished in an open yard adjacent to the shaking table, and the test specimens were quickly assembled on the table using indoor cranes. The table occupation was four out of 35 weeks of the entire test duration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大型振动台试验的启示:关键的批评和潜在的解决方案
本文介绍了作者在日本使用E-Defense振动台进行大型振动台试验的经验。讨论的重点是对大型振动台试验的效用经常提出的四个批评。根据对一对三层木结构房屋进行的振动台测试,讨论了减轻此类批评的潜在解决方案。第一个批评是,测试样本锚定刚性振动台不是一个复制的实际结构由土壤和基础支持。在一个大沙箱中开发了一个模型地面,占总试样重量的85%左右,支撑着房屋,整个土-结构体系被震动。发生了相当大的滑动,减少了施加的地震力和对上部结构的破坏。第二个批评是,一个单一的试样试验,不管它的大小,不能提供足够的信息来概括的行为和性能。通过一系列振动台试验,建立了最大层间位移与固有频率变化之间的经验方程。在实际地震中,使用这种经验方程可以促进对单个房屋的快速损坏评估。第三种批评是,为了确保大规模测试设施的预算,公众呼吁和最终得到公众的支持至关重要。示例试验的特点是两个几乎相同的试件放在不同的支撑条件下的桌子上。这种明显的响应差异揭示了支护条件对抗震性能的影响。第四个批评是增加实验项目数量以平衡运营预算的重要性。样例试验的大部分准备工作都是在靠近振动台的露天场地完成的,并利用室内吊车将试件快速组装到振动台上。在整个测试持续时间的35周中,占据桌子的时间是4周。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
期刊最新文献
Issue information Behavior of Long-Slotted Perforated Steel Plate Fuses in Timber Brace End Connections Development of a New Analytical Approach for Earthquake-Induced Hydrodynamic Forces of Elevated Pile-Cap Foundations Submerged in Water
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1