Glocal Capitalist Class: How Same-Nation Interlocks Facilitate Transnational Corporate Political Unity in Global Environmental Politics

IF 2.5 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/glob.12522
Rami Kaplan, Erez Aharon Marantz
{"title":"Glocal Capitalist Class: How Same-Nation Interlocks Facilitate Transnational Corporate Political Unity in Global Environmental Politics","authors":"Rami Kaplan,&nbsp;Erez Aharon Marantz","doi":"10.1111/glob.12522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Elite theorists assume that transnational capitalist class unity is facilitated through transnational elite spaces and networks. We argue for a more glocal notion of transnational unification that highlights the role of same-nation networks of interlocking directorates linking major transnational corporations (TNCs) in disseminating corporate political behaviours on a global scale. The same-nation elite networks are effective mechanisms of transnational unity because their members, whom we call ‘glocal interlockers’, are at once socialized into the global system and influential figures in their national TNC communities. Empirically, we analyze how interlocking directorates among the world's largest 189 TNCs facilitated the worldwide adoption of private environmental practices in the period 2006–2013, in the context of TNCs’ mobilization to preempt an intergovernmental regulatory regime on climate change by promoting a global governance privatization agenda. We find that firms’ level of centrality in glocal interlocks networks explained their levels of private environmental practices adoption, while their centrality in the transnational inner circle of cross-border interlockers did not. These results suggest that the persistence of local elite formations can enable rather than hinder transnational corporate unity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47882,"journal":{"name":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/glob.12522","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/glob.12522","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Elite theorists assume that transnational capitalist class unity is facilitated through transnational elite spaces and networks. We argue for a more glocal notion of transnational unification that highlights the role of same-nation networks of interlocking directorates linking major transnational corporations (TNCs) in disseminating corporate political behaviours on a global scale. The same-nation elite networks are effective mechanisms of transnational unity because their members, whom we call ‘glocal interlockers’, are at once socialized into the global system and influential figures in their national TNC communities. Empirically, we analyze how interlocking directorates among the world's largest 189 TNCs facilitated the worldwide adoption of private environmental practices in the period 2006–2013, in the context of TNCs’ mobilization to preempt an intergovernmental regulatory regime on climate change by promoting a global governance privatization agenda. We find that firms’ level of centrality in glocal interlocks networks explained their levels of private environmental practices adoption, while their centrality in the transnational inner circle of cross-border interlockers did not. These results suggest that the persistence of local elite formations can enable rather than hinder transnational corporate unity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英理论家认为,跨国资本主义阶级统一是通过跨国精英空间和网络促成的。我们提出了一种更具地方性的跨国统一概念,强调了跨国大公司连锁董事的同国网络在全球范围内传播公司政治行为的作用。同国精英网络是跨国统一的有效机制,因为其成员(我们称之为 "全球联锁者")既是全球体系的社会化成员,又是本国跨国公司社区的有影响力人物。通过实证研究,我们分析了 2006-2013 年期间,在跨国公司通过推动全球治理私有化议程,动员建立政府间气候变化监管制度的背景下,全球最大的 189 家跨国公司的连锁董事局是如何促进在全球范围内采用私营环境实践的。我们发现,企业在全球连锁网络中的中心地位可以解释其采用私营环境实践的程度,而其在跨国连锁内部圈中的中心地位则不能解释其采用私营环境实践的程度。这些结果表明,地方精英组织的持续存在能够促进而不是阻碍跨国公司的团结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Glocal Capitalist Class: How Same-Nation Interlocks Facilitate Transnational Corporate Political Unity in Global Environmental Politics Friction and Fragility in Encountering Cultural Difference: Why Global South Fulbright Students Withdraw From Cosmopolitanism in the United States The Impact of Digital Technologies on the Transnational Aging Experience of Older Hong Kongers The Welfare System in the Face of War Refugees From Ukraine: The Experience of Social Workers in Poland Changed Reality, Changed Positions: The Case Study of Eritrean Women Refugees in Times of Global Pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1