Grassland bird responses to bison and prescribed fire in restored tallgrass prairies

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1002/jwmg.22699
Antonio Del Vallé, Peter W. Guiden, Holly P. Jones
{"title":"Grassland bird responses to bison and prescribed fire in restored tallgrass prairies","authors":"Antonio Del Vallé,&nbsp;Peter W. Guiden,&nbsp;Holly P. Jones","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grazing from megaherbivores such as bison (<i>Bison bison</i>) and periodic fire are 2 important disturbance regimes in grassland ecosystems. In restored tallgrass prairies where these processes were previously removed, prescribed fire application and bison reintroduction are tools used by managers to recreate habitat heterogeneity formed by these disturbances. Tallgrass prairie bird communities may be indirectly affected by these disturbances, as bison and prescribed fire alter the structure of critical breeding habitat for grassland birds. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of bison and prescribed fire on grassland breeding birds in 2 tallgrass prairie preserves in the Midwest region of the United States. We surveyed bird communities, vegetation structure, and bison activity at an Illinois preserve (<i>n</i> = 20 sites) and an Indiana preserve (<i>n</i> = 27 sites) in 2020 and 2021 and compiled a history of restoration activities (e.g., prescribed fire, planting year) at these sites. Grazing and fire disturbances affected grassland bird diversity and abundances, whereas we found little to no evidence that restoration planting age and spatiotemporal factors affected grassland bird populations. Disturbance effects often corresponded to species-specific responses to changes in vegetation structure. Grassland-obligate bird diversity was lower in recently burned and ungrazed management units, in comparison to unburned-ungrazed and unburned-grazed sites. Henslow's sparrow (<i>Centronyx henslowii</i>), a species known to be sensitive to recent prescribed fire, exhibited increased abundance with time since fire, an increase that was further amplified with bison presence. These results highlight the importance of applying varying levels of grazing and fire disturbance to provide variable vegetation structure to accommodate the habitat preferences of a diversity of grassland bird species. Moreover, our results indicate that bison may play a role in mediating the differing effects of variable prescribed fire frequencies on grassland bird species of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grazing from megaherbivores such as bison (Bison bison) and periodic fire are 2 important disturbance regimes in grassland ecosystems. In restored tallgrass prairies where these processes were previously removed, prescribed fire application and bison reintroduction are tools used by managers to recreate habitat heterogeneity formed by these disturbances. Tallgrass prairie bird communities may be indirectly affected by these disturbances, as bison and prescribed fire alter the structure of critical breeding habitat for grassland birds. The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of bison and prescribed fire on grassland breeding birds in 2 tallgrass prairie preserves in the Midwest region of the United States. We surveyed bird communities, vegetation structure, and bison activity at an Illinois preserve (n = 20 sites) and an Indiana preserve (n = 27 sites) in 2020 and 2021 and compiled a history of restoration activities (e.g., prescribed fire, planting year) at these sites. Grazing and fire disturbances affected grassland bird diversity and abundances, whereas we found little to no evidence that restoration planting age and spatiotemporal factors affected grassland bird populations. Disturbance effects often corresponded to species-specific responses to changes in vegetation structure. Grassland-obligate bird diversity was lower in recently burned and ungrazed management units, in comparison to unburned-ungrazed and unburned-grazed sites. Henslow's sparrow (Centronyx henslowii), a species known to be sensitive to recent prescribed fire, exhibited increased abundance with time since fire, an increase that was further amplified with bison presence. These results highlight the importance of applying varying levels of grazing and fire disturbance to provide variable vegetation structure to accommodate the habitat preferences of a diversity of grassland bird species. Moreover, our results indicate that bison may play a role in mediating the differing effects of variable prescribed fire frequencies on grassland bird species of concern.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在恢复的高草草原上,草原鸟类对野牛和规定火灾的反应
大型食草动物如美洲野牛(bison bison)的放牧和周期性火灾是草地生态系统的两个重要干扰机制。在恢复的高草草原上,这些过程以前被移除,规定的火灾应用和野牛的重新引入是管理者用来重建由这些干扰形成的栖息地异质性的工具。高草草原鸟类群落可能受到这些干扰的间接影响,因为野牛和规定的火改变了草原鸟类关键繁殖栖息地的结构。本研究的目的是确定美国中西部地区2个高草草原保护区的野牛和规定火对草地繁殖鸟类的影响。我们于2020年和2021年在伊利诺伊州的一个保护区(n = 20个地点)和印第安纳州的一个保护区(n = 27个地点)调查了鸟类群落、植被结构和野牛活动,并编制了这些地点的恢复活动历史(例如规定的火灾、种植年)。放牧和火灾干扰影响了草地鸟类的多样性和丰度,而恢复种植年龄和时空因素对草地鸟类种群的影响微乎其微。干扰效应通常对应于物种对植被结构变化的特定响应。与未燃烧未放牧和未燃烧放牧的地点相比,最近燃烧和未放牧的管理单位的草地义务鸟类多样性较低。亨斯洛麻雀(Centronyx henslowii)是一种已知对最近规定的火灾敏感的物种,火灾发生后,其数量随着时间的推移而增加,野牛的存在进一步放大了这种增加。这些结果强调了采用不同程度的放牧和火灾干扰来提供可变植被结构以适应多种草原鸟类栖息地偏好的重要性。此外,我们的研究结果表明,野牛可能在不同规定火灾频率对关注的草原鸟类的不同影响中发挥中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of dedicated revenue scale and diversity among U.S. state fish and wildlife agencies Prioritizing efficient use of resources: Simple changes to monitoring combat inefficient capture-recapture of vulnerable skinks Indirect effects of fast-growing urban development on wildlife in a coastal protected area of Costa Rica Writing in the Biological Sciences: A Comprehensive Resource for Scientific Communication (5th edition) By Angelika H. Hofmann, New York, New York: Oxford University Press. 2024. pp. 408. $49.99 (paperback). ISBN 978-0-1976-6540-4 Evaluating the impact of hunter access and harvest regulations on elk movement and resource selection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1