Secondary Transfer Effect and Natives' Acculturation Behaviours: The Role of Natives' Perceived Moral Distance and Multicultural Ideology

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1002/casp.70034
Chiara Parisse, Stefano Livi, Loris Vezzali, Veronica Margherita Cocco, Ankica Kosic, Stefano Pagliaro
{"title":"Secondary Transfer Effect and Natives' Acculturation Behaviours: The Role of Natives' Perceived Moral Distance and Multicultural Ideology","authors":"Chiara Parisse,&nbsp;Stefano Livi,&nbsp;Loris Vezzali,&nbsp;Veronica Margherita Cocco,&nbsp;Ankica Kosic,&nbsp;Stefano Pagliaro","doi":"10.1002/casp.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increase in migration and cultural diversity across various Western regions has highlighted the need to promote harmonious coexistence between those who migrate from other countries and the native populations. Promoting social harmony is the primary objective in both acculturation and intergroup contact research. Particularly relevant to this aim is the secondary transfer effect (STE), consisting in the spreading of the effects of contact with a primary outgroup to attitudes towards secondary outgroups uninvolved in the contact setting. This study aims to explore the STE of positive contact with African migrants (as the primary outgroup) on the acculturation behaviours of natives, and specifically, how these behaviours affect natives' prointegration actions towards refugees (as the secondary outgroup). To achieve this objective, we also investigated two potential underlying processes: natives' perceived moral distance, linked to the STE and contact literature, and natives' multicultural ideology, associated with natives' acculturation preferences. We hypothesised that positive interactions of Italian adults (<i>N</i> = 280) with African migrants would be associated with natives' prorefugee behaviours through natives' perceived moral distance towards African migrants and their multicultural ideology. Logistic SEM analysis revealed indirect effects through the two hypothesised mediators, emphasising their role in driving natives' prorefugee behaviours.</p>","PeriodicalId":47850,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/casp.70034","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/casp.70034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase in migration and cultural diversity across various Western regions has highlighted the need to promote harmonious coexistence between those who migrate from other countries and the native populations. Promoting social harmony is the primary objective in both acculturation and intergroup contact research. Particularly relevant to this aim is the secondary transfer effect (STE), consisting in the spreading of the effects of contact with a primary outgroup to attitudes towards secondary outgroups uninvolved in the contact setting. This study aims to explore the STE of positive contact with African migrants (as the primary outgroup) on the acculturation behaviours of natives, and specifically, how these behaviours affect natives' prointegration actions towards refugees (as the secondary outgroup). To achieve this objective, we also investigated two potential underlying processes: natives' perceived moral distance, linked to the STE and contact literature, and natives' multicultural ideology, associated with natives' acculturation preferences. We hypothesised that positive interactions of Italian adults (N = 280) with African migrants would be associated with natives' prorefugee behaviours through natives' perceived moral distance towards African migrants and their multicultural ideology. Logistic SEM analysis revealed indirect effects through the two hypothesised mediators, emphasising their role in driving natives' prorefugee behaviours.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二次迁移效应与土著文化适应行为:土著道德距离感知和多元文化意识形态的作用
西方各地区移徙和文化多样性的增加突出表明,需要促进从其他国家移徙的人与当地人口之间的和谐共处。促进社会和谐是文化适应研究和群体间接触研究的首要目标。与这一目标特别相关的是次要转移效应(STE),它包括与主要外群体接触的影响传播到对未参与接触环境的次要外群体的态度。本研究旨在探讨与非洲移民(作为主要外群体)的积极接触对当地人文化适应行为的影响,特别是这些行为如何影响当地人对难民(作为次要外群体)的亲融合行动。为了实现这一目标,我们还研究了两个潜在的潜在过程:与STE和接触文献相关的土著感知道德距离,以及与土著文化适应偏好相关的土著多元文化意识形态。我们假设意大利成年人(N = 280)与非洲移民的积极互动将通过当地人对非洲移民及其多元文化意识形态的感知道德距离与当地人的亲难民行为有关。逻辑扫描电镜分析揭示了通过两个假设的中介的间接影响,强调了它们在驱动当地人的亲难民行为中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology publishes papers regarding social behaviour in relation to community problems and strengths. The journal is international in scope, reflecting the common concerns of scholars and community practitioners in Europe and worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Village Identification, Village Support and Collective Efficacy Among People Living in Poverty in Nepal Societal Threats and Immigrant Discrimination: The Role of Social Dominance Orientation and Essentialism ‘It's Very Hard to Feel Accepted When a Whole Country Screams That They Don't Want You Here’: Minorities' Experiences of the UK 2024 Summer Riots From Critique to Construction: The Ancestral Institute as a Praxis-Based Model for Decolonial Community Psychology Understanding the 2024 Summer Riots in the UK: Three Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1