Joint Investment and Pricing Decisions in a Mobile Game Supply Chain Considering Risk Attitudes

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Managerial and Decision Economics Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/mde.4410
Jiali Qu, Jiawei Zhang, Benyong Hu, Chao Meng
{"title":"Joint Investment and Pricing Decisions in a Mobile Game Supply Chain Considering Risk Attitudes","authors":"Jiali Qu,&nbsp;Jiawei Zhang,&nbsp;Benyong Hu,&nbsp;Chao Meng","doi":"10.1002/mde.4410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This paper studies the joint decision-making problem of investment and pricing in a mobile game supply chain with a game developer and a distribution platform with different risk attitudes. The investment here involves the mobile game's quality investment during the development process and promotion investment during the operation process. First, the mean–variance utility theory is used to describe the risk attitudes of the supply chain participants. On this basis, considering the mobile game's individualized operational characteristics with respect to production and sales, the supply chain's and its participants' decision-making models are established with the expected utility as an objective function. Second, the supply chain collaboration is modeled as a Stackelberg game. This paper obtains the optimal decisions of the participants and reveals the effects of the participants' risk attitudes on the optimal quality investment, promotion investment, and pricing policy. Finally, this paper further reveals the relationship between participants' risk attitudes and their expected profits. It is found that participants' risk attitudes will change the relationship between the expected profits under centralized decision-making and those under decentralized decision-making. These characteristics remain valid when a different demand format is employed or the supply chain members play a Nash game.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"46 2","pages":"891-909"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.4410","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies the joint decision-making problem of investment and pricing in a mobile game supply chain with a game developer and a distribution platform with different risk attitudes. The investment here involves the mobile game's quality investment during the development process and promotion investment during the operation process. First, the mean–variance utility theory is used to describe the risk attitudes of the supply chain participants. On this basis, considering the mobile game's individualized operational characteristics with respect to production and sales, the supply chain's and its participants' decision-making models are established with the expected utility as an objective function. Second, the supply chain collaboration is modeled as a Stackelberg game. This paper obtains the optimal decisions of the participants and reveals the effects of the participants' risk attitudes on the optimal quality investment, promotion investment, and pricing policy. Finally, this paper further reveals the relationship between participants' risk attitudes and their expected profits. It is found that participants' risk attitudes will change the relationship between the expected profits under centralized decision-making and those under decentralized decision-making. These characteristics remain valid when a different demand format is employed or the supply chain members play a Nash game.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑风险态度的手机游戏供应链中的联合投资和定价决策
本文研究了具有不同风险态度的游戏开发商和分销平台在手机游戏供应链中的投资与定价联合决策问题。这里的投资包括开发过程中的手游质量投资和运营过程中的推广投资。首先,运用均值方差效用理论描述供应链参与者的风险态度。在此基础上,考虑手机游戏在生产和销售方面的个性化经营特点,以期望效用为目标函数,建立供应链及其参与者的决策模型。其次,将供应链协作建模为Stackelberg博弈。本文得到了参与者的最优决策,揭示了参与者的风险态度对最优质量投资、促销投资和价格政策的影响。最后,本文进一步揭示了参与者的风险态度与预期收益之间的关系。研究发现,参与者的风险态度会改变集中决策和分散决策下预期利润的关系。当采用不同的需求格式或供应链成员进行纳什博弈时,这些特征仍然有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bargaining Power Neutrality in Mergers and Acquisitions The Impact of Cross-Border E-Commerce on Urban Entrepreneurial Activity: Evidence From Cross-Border E-Commerce Comprehensive Pilot Zones The Impact of Technology Finance Policy on Entrepreneurial Activities—An Empirical Study Based on a Spatial DID Model Industry Expert Independent Directors and Corporate Innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1