Why Do Teachers Join Informal Groups and How Are They Managed?: A Research on Informal Groups in Schools

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70005
Adem Beyhan, İnayet Aydın
{"title":"Why Do Teachers Join Informal Groups and How Are They Managed?: A Research on Informal Groups in Schools","authors":"Adem Beyhan,&nbsp;İnayet Aydın","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Informal groups have a significant impact on organisations. It is seen that the researches in the literature are generally conducted on business organisations and informal groups in educational organisations and approaches to managing these groups are not sufficiently discussed. In this study, the identification of informal groups in schools, teachers' reasons for participating in these groups and administrators' management styles of these groups were examined. The study was conducted with the participation of 345 school administrators and 477 teachers working in the central districts of Ankara. The data were collected with ‘Informal Groups List’, ‘Reasons for Participation in Informal Groups Scale’ and ‘Informal Groups Management Style Scale’. Arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, frequency values were calculated in the analysis of the data; also <i>t</i>-test, Anova and Pearson Correlation Test were applied. According to the results of the study, the most common informal groups in schools are ‘reference groups’, ‘interest groups’, ‘friendship groups’ and ‘benefit groups’. Teachers generally participate in informal groups in order to ‘sense of belonging’, ‘making friends’, ‘being in solidarity’ and ‘share their feelings’. According to administrators' views, administrators manage informal groups in democratic, autocratic and laissez-faire styles, respectively, while according to teachers, administrators adopt democratic, laissez-faire and autocratic management styles, respectively. The findings show that there is a moderate positive relationship between administrators' styles of managing informal groups and teachers' reasons for participating. This study is expected to contribute to the literature by determining the types of informal groups in schools, examining the reasons why teachers participate in these groups, and the management styles of school administrators towards these groups.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Informal groups have a significant impact on organisations. It is seen that the researches in the literature are generally conducted on business organisations and informal groups in educational organisations and approaches to managing these groups are not sufficiently discussed. In this study, the identification of informal groups in schools, teachers' reasons for participating in these groups and administrators' management styles of these groups were examined. The study was conducted with the participation of 345 school administrators and 477 teachers working in the central districts of Ankara. The data were collected with ‘Informal Groups List’, ‘Reasons for Participation in Informal Groups Scale’ and ‘Informal Groups Management Style Scale’. Arithmetic mean, standard deviation, percentage, frequency values were calculated in the analysis of the data; also t-test, Anova and Pearson Correlation Test were applied. According to the results of the study, the most common informal groups in schools are ‘reference groups’, ‘interest groups’, ‘friendship groups’ and ‘benefit groups’. Teachers generally participate in informal groups in order to ‘sense of belonging’, ‘making friends’, ‘being in solidarity’ and ‘share their feelings’. According to administrators' views, administrators manage informal groups in democratic, autocratic and laissez-faire styles, respectively, while according to teachers, administrators adopt democratic, laissez-faire and autocratic management styles, respectively. The findings show that there is a moderate positive relationship between administrators' styles of managing informal groups and teachers' reasons for participating. This study is expected to contribute to the literature by determining the types of informal groups in schools, examining the reasons why teachers participate in these groups, and the management styles of school administrators towards these groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师为什么加入非正式团体?如何管理?:学校非正式群体研究
非正式团体对组织有重大影响。可以看出,文献中的研究一般是针对商业组织和教育组织中的非正式群体进行的,并且没有充分讨论管理这些群体的方法。本研究考察了学校非正式群体的识别、教师参与这些群体的原因以及管理者对这些群体的管理方式。在安卡拉中心地区工作的345名学校行政人员和477名教师参加了这项研究。数据采用“非正式群体列表”、“非正式群体参与原因量表”和“非正式群体管理风格量表”收集。在数据分析中计算算术平均值、标准差、百分比、频率值;采用t检验、方差分析和Pearson相关检验。根据研究结果,学校里最常见的非正式小组是“参考小组”、“兴趣小组”、“友谊小组”和“利益小组”。教师一般参加非正式团体是为了“归属感”、“交朋友”、“团结一致”和“分享感受”。在管理者看来,管理者对非正式群体的管理方式分别是民主式、专制式和自由放任式,而在教师看来,管理者对非正式群体的管理方式分别是民主式、自由放任式和专制式。研究结果表明,教师参与非正式群体的原因与管理者管理非正式群体的方式存在适度的正相关关系。本研究旨在通过确定学校非正式群体的类型,研究教师参与这些群体的原因,以及学校管理者对这些群体的管理风格,为文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Correction to ‘Actualization of Interdisciplinary Integration at Mathematics Lessons’ Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Perceived Principal Leadership and Work Engagement Among Chinese Primary School Teachers: The Roles of Occupational Stress and Job Crafting Digital Pedagogies in Music Education: Exploring Technology-Mediated Strategies for Creative Skill Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1