Political regime and income (re)distribution—Panel data analysis in 126 countries

IF 1.4 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2024-09-25 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12320
Brandon Parsons, Shahdad Naghshpour
{"title":"Political regime and income (re)distribution—Panel data analysis in 126 countries","authors":"Brandon Parsons,&nbsp;Shahdad Naghshpour","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study analyzes the relationship between the political regime and income (re)distribution. The unbalanced panel has 126 countries from 1988 to 2021, which is subdivided by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) membership. In non-OECD countries, the study finds that more democratic regimes and movements toward democracy on the political regime spectrum are associated with (1) increases in the market Gini coefficient, (2) increases in the net Gini coefficient, and (3) less absolute income redistribution. This suggests that democratic transitions may lead to greater income inequality, and these transitions do not necessarily correspond with more aggressive redistributive policies. In OECD countries, the political regime has an insignificant relationship with Gini coefficients and absolute income redistribution. The findings are robust to two political regime measures, namely, Polity5 and International Country Risk Guide, and multiple econometric models (e.g., Ordinary Least Squares, Fixed Effects, Generalized Least Squares, and Generalized Method of Moments). The study also explores the role of regime longevity, government stability, and institutional strength on income (re)distribution. Although the results are mixed, many models find that government stability and institutional strength are often associated with a decrease in Gini coefficients.</p>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":"37 1","pages":"341-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study analyzes the relationship between the political regime and income (re)distribution. The unbalanced panel has 126 countries from 1988 to 2021, which is subdivided by Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) membership. In non-OECD countries, the study finds that more democratic regimes and movements toward democracy on the political regime spectrum are associated with (1) increases in the market Gini coefficient, (2) increases in the net Gini coefficient, and (3) less absolute income redistribution. This suggests that democratic transitions may lead to greater income inequality, and these transitions do not necessarily correspond with more aggressive redistributive policies. In OECD countries, the political regime has an insignificant relationship with Gini coefficients and absolute income redistribution. The findings are robust to two political regime measures, namely, Polity5 and International Country Risk Guide, and multiple econometric models (e.g., Ordinary Least Squares, Fixed Effects, Generalized Least Squares, and Generalized Method of Moments). The study also explores the role of regime longevity, government stability, and institutional strength on income (re)distribution. Although the results are mixed, many models find that government stability and institutional strength are often associated with a decrease in Gini coefficients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治制度和收入(再)分配——126个国家的面板数据分析
本研究分析了政治制度与收入(再)分配之间的关系。这个不平衡的小组从1988年到2021年有126个国家,按经济合作与发展组织(OECD)成员国进行细分。在非经合组织国家,研究发现,在政治制度谱上,更民主的政权和民主运动与(1)市场基尼系数的增加,(2)净基尼系数的增加,以及(3)绝对收入再分配的减少有关。这表明,民主转型可能导致更大的收入不平等,而这些转型并不一定与更激进的再分配政策相对应。在经合组织国家,政治制度与基尼系数和绝对收入再分配的关系不显著。研究结果对于两种政治制度指标(即Polity5和国际国家风险指南)以及多种计量经济模型(如普通最小二乘法、固定效应、广义最小二乘法和广义矩量法)具有稳健性。该研究还探讨了政权寿命、政府稳定性和制度强度对收入(再)分配的作用。尽管结果好坏参半,但许多模型发现,政府稳定性和制度强度往往与基尼系数的下降有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Contested Compromise: Public Policy Reforms as Share Contests Data Elements Marketization and Corporate ESG Performance: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on China's Data Trading Platforms Pilot Policies Doubling Down Political Budget Cycles: The Role of State-Owned Enterprises Economic Policy Uncertainty and Crime: An Asymmetric Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1