The essential conditions of writing workshop: Proposing a new conceptual model

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Literacy Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1111/lit.12394
Douglas Kaufman
{"title":"The essential conditions of writing workshop: Proposing a new conceptual model","authors":"Douglas Kaufman","doi":"10.1111/lit.12394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Writing workshop, as conceived by Donald Graves and other US researchers in the 1980s, positively transformed the writing instruction of many teachers. However, others experienced considerable challenges as they tried to create workshop classrooms. This article examines the three historical conditions that defined workshop: (1) choice, (2) time and (3) response, highlighting several factors that may lead to unsuccessful practices as teachers attempt to implement them. Then, based on an analysis of the early work of the original researchers and the practices of exemplary workshop educators, it identifies three other conditions—(4) organization and management to promote classroom movement, (5) community-building to create a shared culture of writers and (6) living a publicly literate life—that appear to support the successful implementation of the original three conditions. Finally, pulling from an analysis of the contemporary work of <i>current</i> workshop researchers and educators, it identifies one final condition that was conspicuously <i>not</i> represented in the early work but nonetheless appears essential in connecting and contextualizing all conditions: (7) the introduction of writing purpose to promote empowerment and equity. Together, these conditions form a new and more holistic theoretical model that may now be examined, interpreted, implemented in practice and evolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":46082,"journal":{"name":"Literacy","volume":"59 1","pages":"70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lit.12394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing workshop, as conceived by Donald Graves and other US researchers in the 1980s, positively transformed the writing instruction of many teachers. However, others experienced considerable challenges as they tried to create workshop classrooms. This article examines the three historical conditions that defined workshop: (1) choice, (2) time and (3) response, highlighting several factors that may lead to unsuccessful practices as teachers attempt to implement them. Then, based on an analysis of the early work of the original researchers and the practices of exemplary workshop educators, it identifies three other conditions—(4) organization and management to promote classroom movement, (5) community-building to create a shared culture of writers and (6) living a publicly literate life—that appear to support the successful implementation of the original three conditions. Finally, pulling from an analysis of the contemporary work of current workshop researchers and educators, it identifies one final condition that was conspicuously not represented in the early work but nonetheless appears essential in connecting and contextualizing all conditions: (7) the introduction of writing purpose to promote empowerment and equity. Together, these conditions form a new and more holistic theoretical model that may now be examined, interpreted, implemented in practice and evolved.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写作讲习班的基本条件:提出一个新的概念模型
唐纳德-格雷夫斯(Donald Graves)和其他美国研究人员在 20 世纪 80 年代提出的写作工作坊理念,积极地改变了许多教师的写作教学。然而,其他教师在尝试创建工作坊课堂时也遇到了相当大的挑战。本文探讨了界定工作坊的三个历史条件:(1) 选择;(2) 时间;(3) 反应,强调了教师在尝试实施工作坊时可能导致失败的几个因素。然后,根据对最初研究者的早期工作和模范工作坊教育者的实践的分析,确定了另外三个条件--(4)促进课堂活动的组织和管理;(5)创建作家共享文化的社区建设;(6)过一种公开的扫盲生活--这些条件似乎有助于成功实施最初的三个条件。最后,通过对当前工作坊研究者和教育者的当代工作的分析,本报告确定了最后一个条件,它在早期的工作坊中明显没有出现,但在连接所有条件并将其背景化方面却显得至关重要:(7) 引入写作目的,以促进赋权和公平。这些条件共同构成了一个新的、更全面的理论模型,现在可以对其进行研究、解释、实践和发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Literacy
Literacy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Literacy is the official journal of the United Kingdom Literacy Association (formerly the United Kingdom Reading Association), the professional association for teachers of literacy. Literacy is a refereed journal for those interested in the study and development of literacy. Its readership comprises practitioners, teacher educators, researchers and both undergraduate and graduate students. Literacy offers educators a forum for debate through scrutinising research evidence, reflecting on analysed accounts of innovative practice and examining recent policy developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial: The Writing Realities Framework and new directions in writing research, instruction and learning ‘Something I've carried with me’: Visibility and vulnerability within the writing journeys of preservice secondary English teachers Daybooks: Writers' notebooks reveal the processes, genre choices and reflections of fourth-grade writers Using constructs of ‘good’ writing to develop ‘a voice of one's own’ in the primary school classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1