The challenge of managing and retaining risks: How a paradox perspective reduces harm, realizes opportunities and enriches performance

IF 3.5 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1111/joop.70011
Emma Soane
{"title":"The challenge of managing and retaining risks: How a paradox perspective reduces harm, realizes opportunities and enriches performance","authors":"Emma Soane","doi":"10.1111/joop.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managers in many kinds of organizations encounter risks in their daily work. A key challenge involves finding ways to manage risks and prevent harm to individuals or organizations, while retaining risks to realize opportunities. These pressures create a tension between risk management and risk retention that prevails in many sectors and is especially consequential in organizations where failures to address it may be fatal. I use inductive analysis to explore qualitative data from 72 television production company managers whose work has potential for trauma, injury and death as well as success. I find the tension between risk management and risk retention can be understood in relation to perceptions and goals. I contribute to theorizing about organizational paradox by showing how perceptions of the tension differ at the individual level. Some managers perceive the tension as a trade-off, focus on risk management and emphasize safety goals. Other managers perceive the tension as a paradox and emphasize wider performance goals that encompass safety and risk. These managers use their agency to foster empowerment and creativity. Doing so enhances to both risk management and risk retention, creating a dynamic equilibrium that reduces harm, realizes opportunities and enriches performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managers in many kinds of organizations encounter risks in their daily work. A key challenge involves finding ways to manage risks and prevent harm to individuals or organizations, while retaining risks to realize opportunities. These pressures create a tension between risk management and risk retention that prevails in many sectors and is especially consequential in organizations where failures to address it may be fatal. I use inductive analysis to explore qualitative data from 72 television production company managers whose work has potential for trauma, injury and death as well as success. I find the tension between risk management and risk retention can be understood in relation to perceptions and goals. I contribute to theorizing about organizational paradox by showing how perceptions of the tension differ at the individual level. Some managers perceive the tension as a trade-off, focus on risk management and emphasize safety goals. Other managers perceive the tension as a paradox and emphasize wider performance goals that encompass safety and risk. These managers use their agency to foster empowerment and creativity. Doing so enhances to both risk management and risk retention, creating a dynamic equilibrium that reduces harm, realizes opportunities and enriches performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理和保留风险的挑战:悖论视角如何减少危害、实现机遇并丰富绩效
许多组织的管理者在日常工作中都会遇到风险。一个关键的挑战是找到管理风险的方法,防止对个人或组织造成伤害,同时保留风险以实现机会。这些压力造成了风险管理和风险保留之间的紧张关系,这种紧张关系在许多部门普遍存在,在无法解决这一问题的组织中尤其严重,可能是致命的。我用归纳分析的方法对72位电视制作公司经理的定性数据进行了探讨,这些经理的工作既有可能带来创伤、伤害和死亡,也有可能取得成功。我发现风险管理和风险保留之间的紧张关系可以从感知和目标的角度来理解。我通过展示个人对紧张关系的不同看法,为组织悖论的理论化做出了贡献。一些管理者将这种紧张关系视为一种权衡,专注于风险管理,强调安全目标。其他管理者将这种紧张关系视为一种悖论,并强调包括安全和风险在内的更广泛的绩效目标。这些管理者利用他们的代理来培养权力和创造力。这样做增强了风险管理和风险保留,创造了一个动态平衡,减少了伤害,实现了机会,并丰富了业绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
期刊最新文献
Transformational and directive leadership in the operating room: Complementary effects under surgical complexity Balancing newcomer social integration and voice during organizational socialization: A longitudinal study of antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions Directive leadership as social adaptation: How leader and aggregate team core self-evaluation interact with team past performance to shape directive behaviour Exploring the role of cognitive job demands in job demands-resources theory Exploring the relation between IRT estimates of within-person variability in personality and job performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1