Jaejin Lee, Paul Villanueva, Kate Glanville, Andy Vanloocke, Wendy H. Yang, Angela Kent, Marshall McDaniel, Steven J. Hall, Adina Howe
{"title":"Impacts of Legacy and Contemporary Nitrogen Inputs on N2O and CO2 Emissions in Miscanthus and Maize Cultivated Soils","authors":"Jaejin Lee, Paul Villanueva, Kate Glanville, Andy Vanloocke, Wendy H. Yang, Angela Kent, Marshall McDaniel, Steven J. Hall, Adina Howe","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nutrient inputs influence the sustainability of bioenergy crop production through contemporary (shortly after addition) and legacy effects (persisting over years) on microbial nitrogen (N) and carbon cycling, which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. However, the relative importance of contemporary and legacy effects and how that could vary by crop functional types is poorly understood. Considering its rhizomatous roots and perennial growth, we hypothesized that <i>Miscanthus</i> × giganteus (M×g) would be more sensitive to legacy N fertilization and the historical context of its environment than an annual crop like maize. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effects of legacy and contemporary N inputs on nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions, as well as key N cycling genes in soils where M×g and maize were grown. A 150-day soil incubation experiment was conducted using soils from a long-term M×g and maize fertility experiment with three historic N fertilization rates (0, 112, and 336 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) and a contemporary amendment (60 mg N kg<sup>−1</sup>) with negative control (0 mg N kg<sup>−1</sup>). We observed significant increases in cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in Mxg soils relative to maize soils, particularly at higher legacy fertilization rates, while contemporary N had no significant effect. Bacterial <i>amo</i>A gene abundance, which plays a significant role in nitrification in nutrient-rich soils, also increased with higher legacy fertilization rates in M×g soils but was unaffected by the contemporary N. In maize soils, legacy and contemporary N did not significantly affect N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, but cumulative CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and <i>amo</i>A gene abundance significantly increased. The abundances of <i>nor</i>B genes were not significantly influenced by either legacy fertilization or contemporary N amendments in either soil. Our findings demonstrate the greater importance of fertilization history over contemporary N in mediating soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, particularly for perennial bioenergy crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nutrient inputs influence the sustainability of bioenergy crop production through contemporary (shortly after addition) and legacy effects (persisting over years) on microbial nitrogen (N) and carbon cycling, which contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. However, the relative importance of contemporary and legacy effects and how that could vary by crop functional types is poorly understood. Considering its rhizomatous roots and perennial growth, we hypothesized that Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g) would be more sensitive to legacy N fertilization and the historical context of its environment than an annual crop like maize. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effects of legacy and contemporary N inputs on nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, as well as key N cycling genes in soils where M×g and maize were grown. A 150-day soil incubation experiment was conducted using soils from a long-term M×g and maize fertility experiment with three historic N fertilization rates (0, 112, and 336 kg N ha−1 year−1) and a contemporary amendment (60 mg N kg−1) with negative control (0 mg N kg−1). We observed significant increases in cumulative N2O emissions in Mxg soils relative to maize soils, particularly at higher legacy fertilization rates, while contemporary N had no significant effect. Bacterial amoA gene abundance, which plays a significant role in nitrification in nutrient-rich soils, also increased with higher legacy fertilization rates in M×g soils but was unaffected by the contemporary N. In maize soils, legacy and contemporary N did not significantly affect N2O emissions, but cumulative CO2 emissions and amoA gene abundance significantly increased. The abundances of norB genes were not significantly influenced by either legacy fertilization or contemporary N amendments in either soil. Our findings demonstrate the greater importance of fertilization history over contemporary N in mediating soil N2O emissions, particularly for perennial bioenergy crops.
养分投入通过对微生物氮(N)和碳循环的当代(添加后不久)和遗留效应(持续数年)影响生物能源作物生产的可持续性,而微生物氮(N)和碳循环导致温室气体排放。然而,当代效应和遗留效应的相对重要性以及它们如何随作物功能类型的不同而变化,人们知之甚少。考虑到其根状根系和多年生生长,我们假设Miscanthus × giganteus (M×g)比玉米等一年生作物对遗留氮肥和环境历史背景更敏感。为了验证这一假设,我们研究了在种植M×g和玉米的土壤中,遗留和当代N输入对一氧化二氮(N2O)和二氧化碳(CO2)排放的影响,以及关键的N循环基因。利用长期M×g和玉米肥力试验的土壤进行了150天的土壤培养试验,采用三种历史氮肥施肥量(0、112和336 kg N ha−1年−1)和当代氮肥改良(60 mg N kg−1),负对照(0 mg N kg−1)。我们观察到,相对于玉米土壤,Mxg土壤的累积N2O排放量显著增加,特别是在较高的遗留施肥率下,而当代N没有显著影响。在营养丰富的土壤中,细菌amoA基因丰度在硝化作用中起着重要作用,在M×g土壤中,细菌amoA基因丰度也随着遗留施肥量的增加而增加,但不受当代N的影响。在玉米土壤中,遗留和当代N对N2O排放没有显著影响,但累积CO2排放和amoA基因丰度显著增加。传统施肥和当代施氮对两种土壤中norB基因丰度的影响均不显著。我们的研究结果表明,在调节土壤N2O排放方面,施肥历史比当代氮更重要,特别是对于多年生生物能源作物。
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.