A Comparison of Human-Written Versus AI-Generated Text in Discussions at Educational Settings: Investigating Features for ChatGPT, Gemini and BingAI

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH European Journal of Education Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1111/ejed.70014
Hatice Yildiz Durak, Figen Eğin, Aytuğ Onan
{"title":"A Comparison of Human-Written Versus AI-Generated Text in Discussions at Educational Settings: Investigating Features for ChatGPT, Gemini and BingAI","authors":"Hatice Yildiz Durak,&nbsp;Figen Eğin,&nbsp;Aytuğ Onan","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and BingAI, have become integral to educational sciences, bringing about significant transformations in the education system and the processes of knowledge production. These advancements have facilitated new methods of teaching, learning, and information dissemination. However, the widespread adoption of these technologies raises serious concerns about academic ethics, content authenticity, and the potential for misuse in academic settings. This study aims to evaluate the linguistic features and differences between AI-generated and human-generated articles in educational contexts. By analysing various linguistic attributes such as singular word usage, sentence lengths, and the presence of repetitive or stereotypical phrases, the study identifies key distinctions between the two types of content. The findings indicate that human-generated articles exhibit higher average singular word usage and longer sentence lengths compared to AI-generated articles, suggesting a more complex and nuanced language structure in human writing. Furthermore, the study employs ensemble learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Bagging, and Extra Trees, to classify and distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated texts. Among these, the Extra Trees model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 93%, highlighting its effectiveness in identifying AI-generated content. Additionally, experiments using the BERTurk model, a transformer-based language model, demonstrated a classification accuracy of 95%, particularly in distinguishing human-generated articles from those produced by Gemini. The results of this study have significant implications for the future of education, as they underscore the critical need for robust tools and methodologies to differentiate between human and AI-generated content.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) models, such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and BingAI, have become integral to educational sciences, bringing about significant transformations in the education system and the processes of knowledge production. These advancements have facilitated new methods of teaching, learning, and information dissemination. However, the widespread adoption of these technologies raises serious concerns about academic ethics, content authenticity, and the potential for misuse in academic settings. This study aims to evaluate the linguistic features and differences between AI-generated and human-generated articles in educational contexts. By analysing various linguistic attributes such as singular word usage, sentence lengths, and the presence of repetitive or stereotypical phrases, the study identifies key distinctions between the two types of content. The findings indicate that human-generated articles exhibit higher average singular word usage and longer sentence lengths compared to AI-generated articles, suggesting a more complex and nuanced language structure in human writing. Furthermore, the study employs ensemble learning models, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost, Bagging, and Extra Trees, to classify and distinguish between AI-generated and human-generated texts. Among these, the Extra Trees model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 93%, highlighting its effectiveness in identifying AI-generated content. Additionally, experiments using the BERTurk model, a transformer-based language model, demonstrated a classification accuracy of 95%, particularly in distinguishing human-generated articles from those produced by Gemini. The results of this study have significant implications for the future of education, as they underscore the critical need for robust tools and methodologies to differentiate between human and AI-generated content.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Regional Disparities in Literacy and Numeracy Skills Among Romanian Adults: Evidence From e-PASS 2023 An Unintended Consequence? The Impact of Higher Education Expansion on the Retake Rate of the College Entrance Examination The Impact of Social Entrepreneurship Education on Students' Social Entrepreneurial Intention: The Mediating Role of Social Entrepreneurial Competence The Relationship Between Teachers' Planning and Content Delivery Using the Five-Stage Lesson Plan Structure: An Analysis of Age, Gender, Experience and Academic Qualifications in Kenya Artificial Intelligence-Supported Student Engagement Research: Text Mining and Systematic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1