Untapped capacity of place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing for community resilience

Zhengyang Li, Katherine Idziorek, Anthony Chen, Cynthia Chen
{"title":"Untapped capacity of place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing for community resilience","authors":"Zhengyang Li, Katherine Idziorek, Anthony Chen, Cynthia Chen","doi":"10.1038/s44284-024-00175-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During and after a disaster, people share resources with family, friends and neighbors to tide them over difficult times. The conventional top-down approach for disaster relief overlooks the wealth of critical resources that exist within communities. Here we explicitly model place-based peer-to-peer (P2P) resource sharing and evaluate its impact on community resilience to disasters. Using data from two urban communities in Seattle, Washington State, we confirm substantial untapped capacity for enhanced community resilience through place-based P2P resource sharing. Under a 5-day isolation scenario, place-based P2P sharing can reduce a community’s resilience loss by 13.4–100%; on average, 22–44 social ties per household support an 80% sharing rate of surplus resources. These findings suggest that place-based P2P sharing could be a viable strategy for disaster response across US communities, in addition to the current, government-led effort. Our methodological framework is transferable to other urban communities interested in enhancing disaster resilience. Using two socioeconomically different neighborhoods in Seattle, this study shows that place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing can substantially improve community resilience in both types of neighborhoods. Strong ties were about 1.5–3 times as effective as weak ties, and the neighborhood with lower socioeconomic status (SES) required more ties to achieve an optimal sharing rate than the neighborhood with higher SES.","PeriodicalId":501700,"journal":{"name":"Nature Cities","volume":"2 1","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-024-00175-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During and after a disaster, people share resources with family, friends and neighbors to tide them over difficult times. The conventional top-down approach for disaster relief overlooks the wealth of critical resources that exist within communities. Here we explicitly model place-based peer-to-peer (P2P) resource sharing and evaluate its impact on community resilience to disasters. Using data from two urban communities in Seattle, Washington State, we confirm substantial untapped capacity for enhanced community resilience through place-based P2P resource sharing. Under a 5-day isolation scenario, place-based P2P sharing can reduce a community’s resilience loss by 13.4–100%; on average, 22–44 social ties per household support an 80% sharing rate of surplus resources. These findings suggest that place-based P2P sharing could be a viable strategy for disaster response across US communities, in addition to the current, government-led effort. Our methodological framework is transferable to other urban communities interested in enhancing disaster resilience. Using two socioeconomically different neighborhoods in Seattle, this study shows that place-based peer-to-peer resource sharing can substantially improve community resilience in both types of neighborhoods. Strong ties were about 1.5–3 times as effective as weak ties, and the neighborhood with lower socioeconomic status (SES) required more ties to achieve an optimal sharing rate than the neighborhood with higher SES.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于地点的点对点资源共享以促进社区复原力的未开发能力
在灾难发生期间和之后,人们与家人、朋友和邻居分享资源,以度过难关。传统的自上而下的救灾方法忽视了社区内存在的丰富的关键资源。在这里,我们明确建模基于地点的点对点(P2P)资源共享,并评估其对社区抗灾能力的影响。利用华盛顿州西雅图两个城市社区的数据,我们确认了通过基于地点的P2P资源共享增强社区复原力的大量未开发能力。在5天隔离情景下,基于地点的P2P共享可使社区恢复力损失减少13.4-100%;平均而言,每个家庭有22-44个社会关系支持80%的剩余资源共享率。这些发现表明,除了目前政府主导的努力之外,基于地点的P2P共享可能是美国社区应对灾难的可行策略。我们的方法框架可推广到其他对增强抗灾能力感兴趣的城市社区。本研究以西雅图两个社会经济状况不同的社区为例,表明基于地点的点对点资源共享可以显著提高这两种类型社区的复原力。强关系的有效性约为弱关系的1.5-3倍,社会经济地位较低的社区比社会经济地位较高的社区需要更多的关系来实现最优共享率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tehran in a Boston dream Honest signals The avian dimension Beyond species richness in urban bird acoustic monitoring Vegetation helps urban birds to keep their ecological roles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1