Determination of eight fungicides in tanned leather by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry and with diode array spectrophotometric detection†

IF 2.6 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical Methods Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1039/D4AY02152E
Francisco Javier Acevedo-Aguilar, Israel Enciso Donis, Kazimierz Wrobel, Alma Rosa Corrales Escobosa, Luis Mario Magaña Maldonado and Katarzyna Wrobel
{"title":"Determination of eight fungicides in tanned leather by liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry and with diode array spectrophotometric detection†","authors":"Francisco Javier Acevedo-Aguilar, Israel Enciso Donis, Kazimierz Wrobel, Alma Rosa Corrales Escobosa, Luis Mario Magaña Maldonado and Katarzyna Wrobel","doi":"10.1039/D4AY02152E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Tanned leather needs to be protected against microorganisms which is why various biocides are currently used. To evaluate the effectiveness of leather treatment and to control the concentrations of potentially harmful compounds, simple and reliable analytical procedures are required. In this work, two such procedures are proposed for the determination of eight fungicides in leather, consisting of acetonitrile extraction and liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization – mass spectrometry or diode array spectrophotometric detection (HPLC-ESI-ITMS and HPLC-DAD, respectively). According to the elution order, the analyzed compounds were: 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol (BNPD), methyl 1<em>H</em>-benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate (CBZ), 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), 4-chloro-3-methylphenol (PCMC), 2-phenylphenol (OPP), 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)-benzothiazole (TCMTB), 2-<em>n</em>-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (OIT), 1-[[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]methyl]-1,2,4-triazole (PRO) and 2,5-diphenyloxazole (PPO) as an internal standard. For accuracy testing, three-point standard addition was performed with the percentage recoveries in the ranges 75.0–115% and 91.9–117% for HPLC-ESI-ITMS and HPLC-DAD, respectively. The chemical composition of acetonitrile leather extract had a minor effect on the IS-normalized signal magnitude within the calibration range of each fungicide, as demonstrated by signal suppression/enhancement factors of 84.1–112% and 93.6–102%. The detection power of HPLC-ESI-ITMS was better for all compounds compared to that of HPLC-DAD; however, in real-world samples both procedures consistently detected and quantified individual fungicides. The averaged quantification difference between the two procedures was evaluated yielding <em>σ</em><small><sub>N</sub></small>% values in the range 7.28–16.4%. It is concluded that the two procedures can be used interchangeably for the quantification of eight fungicides declared for use in the leather industry and that PPO is suitable as an internal standard in both.</p>","PeriodicalId":64,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Methods","volume":" 8","pages":" 1774-1783"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/ay/d4ay02152e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tanned leather needs to be protected against microorganisms which is why various biocides are currently used. To evaluate the effectiveness of leather treatment and to control the concentrations of potentially harmful compounds, simple and reliable analytical procedures are required. In this work, two such procedures are proposed for the determination of eight fungicides in leather, consisting of acetonitrile extraction and liquid chromatography with electrospray ionization – mass spectrometry or diode array spectrophotometric detection (HPLC-ESI-ITMS and HPLC-DAD, respectively). According to the elution order, the analyzed compounds were: 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol (BNPD), methyl 1H-benzimidazol-2-yl-carbamate (CBZ), 2-mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), 4-chloro-3-methylphenol (PCMC), 2-phenylphenol (OPP), 2-(thiocyanomethylthio)-benzothiazole (TCMTB), 2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (OIT), 1-[[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-propyl-1,3-dioxolan-2-yl]methyl]-1,2,4-triazole (PRO) and 2,5-diphenyloxazole (PPO) as an internal standard. For accuracy testing, three-point standard addition was performed with the percentage recoveries in the ranges 75.0–115% and 91.9–117% for HPLC-ESI-ITMS and HPLC-DAD, respectively. The chemical composition of acetonitrile leather extract had a minor effect on the IS-normalized signal magnitude within the calibration range of each fungicide, as demonstrated by signal suppression/enhancement factors of 84.1–112% and 93.6–102%. The detection power of HPLC-ESI-ITMS was better for all compounds compared to that of HPLC-DAD; however, in real-world samples both procedures consistently detected and quantified individual fungicides. The averaged quantification difference between the two procedures was evaluated yielding σN% values in the range 7.28–16.4%. It is concluded that the two procedures can be used interchangeably for the quantification of eight fungicides declared for use in the leather industry and that PPO is suitable as an internal standard in both.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液相色谱-质谱联用-二极管阵列分光光度法测定鞣革中8种杀菌剂。
鞣制皮革需要防止微生物,这就是目前使用各种杀菌剂的原因。为了评估皮革处理的有效性和控制潜在有害化合物的浓度,需要简单可靠的分析程序。本研究提出了测定皮革中8种杀菌剂的两种方法,即乙腈萃取-液相色谱-电喷雾电离-质谱法或二极管阵列分光光度法(分别为HPLC-ESI-ITMS和HPLC-DAD)。根据洗脱顺序,分析的化合物为:2-溴-2-硝基丙烷-1,3-二醇(BNPD)、甲基1h -苯并咪唑-2-氨基甲酸酯(CBZ)、2-巯基苯并噻唑(MBT)、4-氯-3-甲基苯酚(PCMC)、2-苯并噻唑(OPP)、2-(硫氰基甲基硫)-苯并噻唑(TCMTB)、2-正辛基-4-异噻唑-3-酮(OIT)、1-[[2-(2,4-二氯苯基)-4-丙基-1,3-二氧唑-2-基]甲基]-1,2,4-三唑(PRO)和2,5-二苯氧唑(PPO)为内标物。HPLC-ESI-ITMS和HPLC-DAD加三点标,加标回收率分别为75.0 ~ 115%和91.9 ~ 117%。乙腈皮革提取物的化学成分对各杀菌剂标定范围内is归一化信号量级的影响较小,信号抑制/增强因子分别为84.1 ~ 112%和93.6 ~ 102%。HPLC-ESI-ITMS对所有化合物的检测能力均优于HPLC-DAD;然而,在实际样品中,这两种方法一致地检测和量化了单个杀菌剂。对两种方法的平均量化差进行了评价,得出σN%的取值范围为7.28 ~ 16.4%。结果表明,这两种方法可互换用于8种申报用于皮革工业的杀菌剂的定量,PPO适合作为这两种杀菌剂的内部标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical Methods
Analytical Methods CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
569
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Early applied demonstrations of new analytical methods with clear societal impact
期刊最新文献
Back cover UV-Vis determination of acetate in ethanol electrolysis for renewable hydrogen production. Multidimensional information detection of liver cancer cell exosomes treated with shikonin. A MIL-53-PVDF mixed-matrix membrane for dispersive membrane solid-phase extraction of phenoxycarboxylic acid herbicides from environmental water samples followed by HPLC determination. A green analytical method for identification and quantification of carcinogenic impurity N-nitroso-desformyl riociguat in riociguat formulations by UHPLC-MS/MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1